PNUD SIGOB · Componente 1. Evaluación y rediseño conceptual
Banco de ejemplos por equipo
Pares de registro actual y registro propuesto para el agente de redacción y clasificación de acciones del Dashboard Regional 3.0
Ciento cuatro pares construidos sobre los 1.958 registros del Dashboard 2.0, agrupados en los ocho equipos regionales. Cada par muestra el registro tal como está en la base, el diagnóstico de lo que falla y la ficha completa del registro propuesto con los campos obligatorios del Dashboard 3.0.
Programa Regional para América Latina y el Caribe 2026 a 2029
Contenido
1. Para qué sirve este banco
2. Cómo usar el banco al configurar el agente
3. Catálogo de tipos de servicio
4. Los ocho patrones que cubren los ejemplos
5. La ficha del registro propuesto
6. Banco de ejemplos por equipo
6.1 LAC Environment Team 14 ejemplos
6.2 Governance 13 ejemplos
6.3 Gender 13 ejemplos
6.4 SDG & Policy 13 ejemplos
6.5 Inclusive Growth 13 ejemplos
6.6 Disaster Risk Reduction 12 ejemplos
6.7 HIV and Health 13 ejemplos
6.8 SDG Integration 13 ejemplos
7. Observaciones sobre el formulario
8. Fuentes
1. Para qué sirve este banco
El Dashboard Regional 3.0 adopta una definición operativa de acción. Una acción es un servicio sustantivo prestado por un equipo regional que responde a un solo tipo de servicio del catálogo, se dirige a un destinatario identificable, genera un resultado o entregable verificable y se ejecuta bajo la responsabilidad de un equipo líder dentro de un período acotado del ciclo programático.
Esa definición se aprende con ejemplos y no con reglas abstractas. El agente de copiloto que acompañará a los equipos en la carga necesita ver, para cada equipo, cómo se ve un registro problemático de su propia base y cómo se ve el registro corregido. Ese es el contenido de este documento.
Todos los pares provienen de registros reales del Dashboard 2.0. El registro actual se transcribe tal como está en la base, con sus erratas y sus campos vacíos. El registro propuesto se construye aplicando la definición y las siete reglas de granularidad, y se presenta con los campos obligatorios del Dashboard 3.0 completos. Cada par cierra con la trazabilidad al identificador original, de modo que cualquier persona puede verificarlo en la matriz de reescritura.
Los ejemplos están en inglés porque en inglés está cargada la base y en inglés redactarán los equipos. El texto que los enmarca está en español.
2. Cómo usar el banco al configurar el agente
El banco está pensado para alimentar tres funciones del agente.
- Redacción. Los registros propuestos son el estándar de redacción. El nombre empieza con un sustantivo de acción, contiene el servicio y el objeto, y no incluye el país, el año, el monto ni el nombre del proyecto. La descripción dice qué se hizo y qué quedó instalado, en dos o tres líneas.
- Clasificación. Cada ficha asigna un solo tipo de servicio del catálogo F01 a F13 y explica en el diagnóstico por qué se eligió ese y no el vecino. Los casos de frontera entre F02 y F08, entre F06 y F07, y entre F09 y F11 están cubiertos de manera explícita.
- Detección. Los diagnósticos enseñan al agente a reconocer los ocho patrones de error de la sección 4 antes de proponer una redacción, y a preguntar al usuario cuando falta el destinatario, el resultado o el período.
Una advertencia sobre el uso. El agente propone, el equipo decide. Varios ejemplos incluyen una nota que señala el punto en el que el criterio depende de información que solo el equipo tiene, como saber si un despliegue nacional supuso adaptación diferenciada. En esos casos el agente debe preguntar y no resolver por su cuenta.
3. Catálogo de tipos de servicio
El campo Service type admite un solo valor por acción. Los códigos F01 a F13 se usan en este documento como referencia corta y corresponden uno a uno con los valores del formulario.
| Código | Valor del campo Service type | Qué incluye |
|---|---|---|
| F01 | Strategic thinking and thought leadership | Definición de agenda, narrativas, estrategias regionales, prospectiva y posicionamiento de temas. |
| F02 | Research, data and knowledge products | Estudios, informes, publicaciones, notas de política, encuestas, índices, tableros y sistemas de medición. |
| F03 | Advocacy, communications and visibility | Campañas, comunicación institucional, difusión y lanzamiento de productos, sensibilización. |
| F04 | Policy advice and technical assistance | Asesoría sustantiva y acompañamiento técnico a oficinas de país, gobiernos y socios. |
| F05 | Capacity development and training | Cursos, diplomados, talleres, academias y transferencia metodológica. |
| F06 | Knowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation | Sistematización, comunidades de práctica, redes de conocimiento e intercambios entre pares. |
| F07 | Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships | Foros y diálogos convocados por el PNUD, coordinación interagencial y gestión de alianzas. |
| F08 | Innovation and digital transformation | Pilotos, prototipado, escalamiento de innovaciones y productos digitales. |
| F09 | Programme design, formulation and scale-up | Notas conceptuales, PRODOC, fases preparatorias y expansión programática. |
| F10 | Programme implementation and oversight | Ejecución y supervisión de proyectos regionales y de fondos verticales, incluidas transferencias. |
| F11 | Resource mobilization and development finance | Movilización de recursos e instrumentos de financiamiento del desarrollo. |
| F12 | Monitoring, evaluation and learning | Sistemas de monitoreo, evaluaciones e informes de resultados. |
| F13 | Operational and institutional management | Gestión interna del Hub y de recursos. Categoría residual. |
4. Los ocho patrones que cubren los ejemplos
Los ejemplos de cada equipo están seleccionados para cubrir estos patrones con casos propios de ese equipo. La proporción de cada patrón varía según la base de cada uno, porque el equipo de ambiente carga desde PIMS y el de reducción de riesgos no tiene duplicación alguna.
| Patrón | Cómo se reconoce | Regla que lo resuelve |
|---|---|---|
| Duplicación por país | Una misma acción registrada una vez por cada país destinatario. | Regla 2 |
| Proyecto como unidad | El título de un proyecto o de un fondo cargado como si fuera la acción. | Regla 3 |
| Registro demasiado agregado | Un registro que mezcla dos o más tipos de servicio del catálogo. | Regla 1 |
| Función permanente | Una línea de trabajo que nunca concluye, con fórmulas como effective delivery u ongoing support. | Regla 5 |
| Actividad puntual | Una reunión, un pago, una misión o una participación sin producto propio. | Regla 4 |
| Nombre sin servicio | Un tema, un acrónimo, un título de publicación o el nombre de una herramienta, sin verbo de acción. | Atributo de propósito |
| Destinatario ausente | Un registro que no permite saber a quién sirve la acción. | Atributo de destinatario |
| Registro bien formulado | Cumple los cinco atributos y solo requiere completar campos. | Ninguna corrección |
5. La ficha del registro propuesto
Cada registro propuesto se presenta con los campos de llenado obligatorio del Dashboard 3.0. La vinculación programática, es decir el outcome, el output y el indicador del Programa Regional 2026 a 2029, no se incluye en los ejemplos porque corresponde a los equipos determinarla en la carga. El campo Result or deliverable no es un campo del formulario, es la parte de la descripción que permite verificar que la acción tiene cierre, y se presenta separado para hacerlo visible.
| Campo de la ficha | Qué debe contener |
|---|---|
| Action | El servicio prestado, iniciando con un sustantivo de acción. Sin país, sin año, sin monto y sin el nombre del proyecto. |
| Description | Dos o tres líneas sobre qué se hizo y qué quedó instalado, con los hitos relevantes del período. |
| Service type | Una sola categoría del catálogo F01 a F13. |
| Country, countries or region | Selección múltiple. Aquí es donde deja de duplicarse el registro por país. |
| Recipient | La institución, la oficina o el conjunto de actores a los que sirve la acción. No puede ser la región en abstracto. |
| Result or deliverable | El producto, resultado o cambio verificable que permite decir cuándo la acción concluyó. |
| Origin | Demand cuando responde a una solicitud de una oficina de país. Supply cuando es oferta programada. |
| Lead team | Un solo equipo responde por el registro y su actualización. |
| Focal point | La persona que responde por la acción. Es campo nuevo y no existía en el Dashboard 2.0. |
| Integrated work | Los demás equipos contribuyentes. Si no hay, se marca Without integrated work. |
| Parent project | El proyecto o programa en cuyo marco se presta el servicio, cuando corresponde. |
| Status | Planned, Ongoing, Dropped o Closed. Es el campo que sostiene la continuidad entre períodos. |
6. Banco de ejemplos por equipo
Cada capítulo abre con una nota sobre el patrón dominante del equipo en la base 2022 a 2025 y continúa con sus pares de ejemplos. El número entre paréntesis en cada título indica el patrón que ilustra el caso.
6.1 LAC Environment Team
El equipo concentra 700 de los 1.958 registros de la base, el 36 por ciento del total, con 637 nombres distintos. Ese volumen no refleja mayor intensidad de trabajo sino un mecanismo de captura distinto, porque la información se descarga de PIMS con lógica de proyecto. La regla 3 es la que resuelve esta situación. El proyecto deja de ser unidad de registro y se convierte en atributo, y lo que se registra son los servicios prestados en su marco, con una descomposición estándar por etapa del ciclo. Los ejemplos de este equipo son los más importantes del banco porque de ellos depende que la comparabilidad entre equipos sea posible.
14 pares de ejemplo
Ejemplo 1 · A PIMS project loaded as an action
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Strengthening Management of the PA System to Better Conserve Endangered Species and their Habitats |
| Description as recorded | Strengthening Management of the PA System to Better Conserve Endangered Species and their Habitats. The description repeats the project title. |
| Rows in the base | 1 row, PIMS 4956. There are 502 rows of this kind in the base. |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record is the title of a GEF project, downloaded from PIMS. A project is a container of financing, not a service. Under rule 3 it is decomposed by stage of the cycle, with one action for design and formulation, one for resource mobilization and one for implementation and oversight, all linked to the same project through the parent project field. In this case the period covered corresponds to the implementation stage. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 3. El proyecto es contenedor, no unidad |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Implementation support and oversight of the protected areas management project |
| Description | Technical supervision and project assurance of the protected areas management project during the reporting period, with the national implementing partner and the country office. The action leaves the assurance completed for the period, with the corresponding progress reports. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Mexico |
| Recipient | National implementing partner and country office |
| Result or deliverable | Project assurance and technical supervision completed for the reporting period |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Strengthening Management of the PA System to Better Conserve Endangered Species and their Habitats |
| Status | Ongoing |
| NOTA PARA EL AGENTE | |
| Cuando en el mismo período el equipo formuló el proyecto, movilizó recursos para él y supervisó su ejecución, corresponden tres acciones vinculadas al mismo proyecto, una por cada etapa. La descomposición estándar es la que hace comparable la información del equipo con la de los demás. | |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 registro PIMS 4956. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1225. |
Ejemplo 2 · The largest country duplication of the team
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Oversight of the Climate Promise in Argentina |
| Description as recorded | Provide technical and strategic support to the Country Office for the implementation of the Climate Promise initiative |
| Rows in the base | 16 rows, one per country (IDs 2160 to 2174, 2893, 2894, 2898) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The oversight of one corporate initiative was recorded sixteen times, once per country office. The country is inside the name and the initiative is the container. One action for the reporting period, with the sixteen countries in scope and the initiative as the parent project. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y regla 3 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Oversight of the implementation of the Climate Promise |
| Description | Technical and strategic support to the country offices and to the national climate authorities for the implementation of the Climate Promise during the reporting period. The action leaves the support delivered and the progress of each country documented. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Panama, Paraguay, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Country offices and national climate authorities |
| Result or deliverable | Technical and strategic support delivered for the reporting period |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Climate Promise |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2160 a 2174, 2893, 2894 y 2898. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1315. |
Ejemplo 3 · One oversight service replicated by project and country
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) Phase-out Management Plan |
| Description as recorded | Oversight of implementation |
| Rows in the base | 12 rows across ten countries (IDs 2700 to 2714) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name is the title of the plan and the description states the service in three words. Twelve rows correspond to the same oversight service delivered to the ozone authorities of ten countries under the same protocol. One oversight action per period, with the plans as parent project. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 3. Descomposición por etapa del ciclo |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Oversight of the implementation of the HCFC phase out management plans |
| Description | Project assurance and technical supervision of the HCFC phase out management plans with the national ozone authorities during the reporting period. The action leaves the assurance completed for the period in each participating country. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guyana, Jamaica, Peru, Uruguay |
| Recipient | National ozone authorities |
| Result or deliverable | Project assurance completed for the reporting period |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Montreal Protocol, HCFC Phase-out Management Plan |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2700 a 2714. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1314. |
Ejemplo 4 · A project phase written as the name of the action
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Extension of institutional strengthening project (phase XV: 1/2024-12/2026) |
| Description as recorded | Oversight of implementation |
| Rows in the base | 7 rows across seven countries (IDs 2674, 2694, 2715 to 2718, 2720) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name carries the project phase and its dates. Both are attributes, the phase belongs to the parent project and the dates belong to the period field. An action that extends across periods keeps its identifier and is updated through the status field. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 6. Continuidad entre períodos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Oversight of the implementation of the institutional strengthening projects of the national ozone units |
| Description | Project assurance and technical supervision of the institutional strengthening projects of the national ozone units during the reporting period, within the corresponding phase of the programme. The action leaves the assurance completed for the period. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Haiti, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay |
| Recipient | National ozone units |
| Result or deliverable | Project assurance completed for the reporting period |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Montreal Protocol, institutional strengthening |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2674, 2694, 2715, 2716, 2717, 2718 y 2720. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1312. |
Ejemplo 5 · Preparatory phase of vertical fund projects
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Preparatory Phase VF Projects |
| Description as recorded | The objective of the GEF PPG is to develop the project concept into a full project |
| Rows in the base | 9 rows across seven countries (IDs 657, 660 to 667) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record was replicated once per project in preparation. Under rule 3 the project is an attribute and the action is the formulation service delivered during the period. The description already states the deliverable, the full project document developed from the approved concept. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 3. La etapa de formulación es la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Preparation of vertical fund project proposals during the preparatory grant phase |
| Description | Development of the full project documents from the approved concepts, during the preparatory grant phase of the vertical fund projects of the participating countries. The action leaves the project documents developed and ready for submission. |
| Service type | Programme design, formulation and scale-up (F09) |
| Country, countries or region | Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras, Panama, Peru, Suriname |
| Recipient | Countries preparing vertical fund projects and the corresponding country offices |
| Result or deliverable | Full project documents developed from the approved concepts |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | GEF project preparation grant |
| Status | Closed |
| NOTA PARA EL AGENTE | |
| En la base histórica esta acción quedó clasificada en movilización de recursos. Al reescribirla se observa que el servicio prestado es la formulación, de modo que corresponde F09. La movilización sería una acción distinta, la presentación de la propuesta al fondo. | |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 657 y 660 a 667. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1342. |
Ejemplo 6 · One proposal recorded once per country covered
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Strategic Partnerships for Selva Maya: A Localized Framework for Inclusive and Sustainable Biodiversity Management to support the Global Biodiversity Framework |
| Description as recorded | Project proposal developed and submitted to IKI in partnership with TNC |
| Rows in the base | 5 rows (IDs 2658, 2659, 2660, 2662, 2663) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | One proposal covering several countries was entered once per country. There is a single formulation process, a single document and a single submission, so it is one action. The donor and the partner move to the corresponding fields. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 aplicada a una propuesta multipaís |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Formulation of the Selva Maya biodiversity project proposal submitted to IKI |
| Description | Preparation of the project proposal on inclusive and sustainable biodiversity management in the Selva Maya, developed with The Nature Conservancy and submitted to the IKI donor. The action leaves the proposal formulated and submitted. |
| Service type | Programme design, formulation and scale-up (F09) |
| Country, countries or region | Belize, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru |
| Recipient | Participating countries and the IKI donor |
| Result or deliverable | Project proposal formulated and submitted |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Selva Maya, IKI |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2658, 2659, 2660, 2662 y 2663. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0787. |
Ejemplo 7 · Oversight of implementation used as the name
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Oversight of implementation |
| Description as recorded | The project aims to introduce low emission urban mobility concepts and energy efficiency management strategies among the municipalities of the San Salvador Metropolitan Area |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 745). The same name appears in dozens of rows of the base. |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name states the service and omits the object. Dozens of rows share this identical name and cannot be told apart without opening the description. The name must contain the service and the object, and the description must state what the project is about. |
| Regla o criterio | Campo de nombre. El servicio y el objeto |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Oversight of the implementation of the low emission urban mobility project in the San Salvador Metropolitan Area |
| Description | Project assurance and technical supervision during the reporting period of the project that introduces low emission urban mobility concepts and energy efficiency management strategies in the municipalities of the metropolitan area. The action leaves the assurance completed for the period. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | El Salvador |
| Recipient | Municipalities of the San Salvador Metropolitan Area |
| Result or deliverable | Project assurance completed for the reporting period |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Low emission urban mobility, San Salvador Metropolitan Area |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 745. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1323. |
Ejemplo 8 · Funding amounts written into the name
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Update Paraguay GCF Funding Proposal: Promoting low-emission and climate-resilient practices in the soy and cattle ranching sectors (257 million USD of which 7 million for UNDP Technical Assistance) |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 645) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The amounts are inside the name. Financial figures belong to the funding fields, where they can be aggregated, and not to a text field that nobody can add up. The service is the update of a proposal submitted to a fund, which is resource mobilization. |
| Regla o criterio | Campo de nombre. Las cifras son atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Update of the GCF funding proposal for low emission practices in the soy and cattle sectors of Paraguay |
| Description | Revision and update of the funding proposal submitted to the Green Climate Fund for the promotion of low emission and climate resilient practices in the soy and cattle ranching sectors, prepared with the government. The action leaves the updated proposal submitted to the fund. |
| Service type | Resource mobilization and development finance (F11) |
| Country, countries or region | Paraguay |
| Recipient | Government and the Green Climate Fund |
| Result or deliverable | Updated funding proposal submitted to the GCF |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | GCF Paraguay soy and cattle proposal |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 645. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1348. |
Ejemplo 9 · Logistical support recorded as an action
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to Gender focal points to attend south south dialogue in Costa Rica August 2023 |
| Description as recorded | Payment and support to attend the dialogue |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows, one per country (IDs 2723 to 2726) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Paying for the travel of participants is a means of execution and not a substantive service. It does not meet the materiality threshold. It is recorded as a milestone inside the action that corresponds to the South South dialogue itself, which is the one that produces the exchange. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Not recorded as an action. Registered as a milestone of the South South dialogue on gender and environment |
| Description | The logistical support that enabled the participation of the gender focal points is documented inside the description of the exchange action, stating the number of participating offices and the contribution made. |
| Service type | Not applicable |
| Country, countries or region | Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico |
| Recipient | Gender focal points of participating country offices |
| Result or deliverable | No deliverable of its own. It contributes to the deliverable of the South South exchange action |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Gender |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Not applicable |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2723, 2724, 2725 y 2726. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0776, marcada como medio de ejecución. |
Ejemplo 10 · Knowledge product with a clear deliverable
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Develop a guide to identify appropriate Nature Based Solutions in Coastal Areas in the Caribbean to manage climate impact from coastal erosion and storm surge |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 648) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record identifies one service type, one product and one audience. It only needs an action noun at the beginning and a description that states who receives the guide and what it leaves installed. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Development of the guide on nature based solutions for coastal areas in the Caribbean |
| Description | Preparation and publication of the guide to identify appropriate nature based solutions for the management of coastal erosion and storm surge in the Caribbean, addressed to coastal authorities and to tourism livelihood actors. The action leaves the guide published. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | The Caribbean |
| Recipient | Caribbean coastal authorities and tourism livelihood actors |
| Result or deliverable | Guide published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 648. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0733. |
Ejemplo 11 · A generic training record
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Workshops and capacity building in different thematic areas in coordination with other institutions |
| Description as recorded | Identify recognized institutions to partnership and implement a capacity building programme to support the implementation of NDCs |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2198) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Different thematic areas and other institutions are formulas that describe nothing. The description does state the actual purpose, a capacity building programme on NDC implementation delivered with partner institutions. The name must state that programme and the partners move to the partner fields. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de propósito y unidad de destinatario |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of the capacity building programme on NDC implementation with partner institutions |
| Description | Design and delivery of the capacity building programme on the implementation of Nationally Determined Contributions, developed with the partner institutions identified for that purpose and addressed to the climate authorities of the region. The action leaves the programme delivered with the partnerships established. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Climate authorities of LAC countries |
| Result or deliverable | Capacity building programme delivered with partner institutions |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Climate Promise |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2198. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0764. |
Ejemplo 12 · A peer exchange forum, not a convening
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Forum in the Caribbean sub-region focused on lessons learned during the revision and development of the NDCs |
| Description as recorded | Develop and convene a forum in the Caribbean sub-region focused on lessons learned during the revision and development of the NDCs, as well as sharing experiences on priorities |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2187) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The forum brings together peers of the same nature, the climate authorities of the subregion, to exchange lessons among themselves. That makes it knowledge exchange, F06, and not multi stakeholder convening, F07. The latter applies when different types of actors are brought together to reach an agreement. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio. Elección entre F06 y F07 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Convening of the Caribbean forum on lessons learned in the revision and development of NDCs |
| Description | Organization and delivery of the subregional forum where the climate authorities of the Caribbean exchanged lessons learned in the revision and development of their Nationally Determined Contributions and identified shared priorities. The action leaves the forum held with documented lessons and priorities. |
| Service type | Knowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06) |
| Country, countries or region | The Caribbean |
| Recipient | Climate authorities of Caribbean countries |
| Result or deliverable | Forum held with documented lessons and priorities |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Climate Promise |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2187. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0770. |
Ejemplo 13 · A digital tool updated for the region
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Update of the NDCLAC web-based tool, including indicators from 27 countries in the region |
| Description as recorded | Collaboration with GIZ, IDB, ECLAC and EUROCLIMA under the framework of the LEDSLAC platform to develop a web based tool for NDC tracking |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2178) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record sits between knowledge production and digital transformation. It is classified as a knowledge product because what is delivered is a tracking instrument with data, and not the development of a digital platform as such. When the effort is the construction of the platform, the service type is F08. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio. Elección entre F02 y F08 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Update of the NDCLAC web tool with indicators from twenty seven countries |
| Description | Update of the web based tool for tracking Nationally Determined Contributions, incorporating the indicators of twenty seven countries of the region, developed within the LEDSLAC platform with the partner institutions. The action leaves the updated tool in operation. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Climate authorities of the twenty seven countries covered |
| Result or deliverable | Updated NDC tracking tool in operation |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | LEDSLAC platform |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2178. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0757. |
Ejemplo 14 · One inventory service across five countries
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Preparation of national inventory of banks of waste-controlled substances and development of a national plan for management of these substances |
| Description as recorded | Oversight of implementation |
| Rows in the base | 5 rows across five countries (IDs 2675, 2682, 2687, 2690, 2693) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name describes a formulation service and the description says oversight of implementation, which contradicts it. The agent must resolve the contradiction by asking what was actually delivered in the period. Here the deliverable is the inventory and the management plan, so the service is formulation. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y regla 3 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Formulation of the national inventories of waste controlled substance banks and of the corresponding management plans |
| Description | Preparation of the national inventory of banks of waste controlled substances and of the national management plan for those substances, with the ozone authorities of each participating country. The action leaves the inventory and the plan formulated. |
| Service type | Programme design, formulation and scale-up (F09) |
| Country, countries or region | Cuba, Jamaica, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay |
| Recipient | National ozone authorities |
| Result or deliverable | Inventory and national management plan formulated |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | LAC Environment Team |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Montreal Protocol |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2675, 2682, 2687, 2690 y 2693. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0793. |
6.2 Governance
El equipo aportó 361 registros con 346 nombres distintos, 1,04 filas por acción, la base con menor duplicación después de reducción de riesgos. Su desafío no es el conteo sino la redacción. Aparecen tres patrones. El primero es el registro que mezcla asesoría de política con apoyo para acceder a financiamiento, que es el ejemplo canónico del documento de definición. El segundo es la función permanente redactada como acción, con fórmulas como effective delivery u ongoing assistance. El tercero es el nombre que contiene la descripción completa de una alianza o de un proyecto.
13 pares de ejemplo
Ejemplo 1 · Policy advice and resource mobilization in one record
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Provide Policy advice to COs and support them to access Rule of Law Global Programme funding to support rule of law, access to justice, citizen security |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 2 rows (IDs 1658 and 2834) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record mixes two service types, policy advice and resource mobilization. It names no recipient beyond the country offices in the abstract and it states no result, so it has no possible closing point. It is split into two linked actions, each with its own deliverable. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Policy advisory to country offices on rule of law, access to justice and citizen security |
| Description | Substantive advice to the country offices working on rule of law, access to justice and citizen security, on the design and adjustment of their interventions. The action leaves country level recommendations agreed with each office. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | LAC country offices working on rule of law |
| Result or deliverable | Policy advice delivered with agreed country level recommendations |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Support to country offices for accessing funding from the Rule of Law Global Programme |
| Description | Accompaniment to the country offices in the preparation and submission of their applications to the funding window of the Rule of Law Global Programme in the corresponding call. The action leaves the applications submitted and the outcome recorded in the status field. |
| Service type | Resource mobilization and development finance (F11) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | LAC country offices applying for funding |
| Result or deliverable | Applications submitted to the Global Programme funding window |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Rule of Law Global Programme |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1658 y 2834. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0369, que en el nuevo ciclo se carga como dos acciones. |
Ejemplo 2 · A permanent function written as an action
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Effective delivery of policy advice and programme support on elections |
| Description as recorded | Provide comprehensive support on electoral assistance and its linkage with broader democratic governance strengthening to at least 50 per cent of the countries holding elections |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1660) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name describes what the team does permanently and never concludes. It fails the test of unity of purpose and the test of unity of time. The description does contain a measurable commitment, and that commitment is what makes the reformulation possible. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 5. Techo de agregación |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of electoral assistance and policy advice to country offices in countries holding elections |
| Description | Electoral assistance and policy advice delivered during the reporting period to the country offices of the countries holding elections, linked to the broader strengthening of democratic governance. The action leaves the assistance delivered to at least half of those countries. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Country offices in countries holding elections in the period |
| Result or deliverable | Electoral assistance delivered to at least half of the countries holding elections |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| NOTA PARA EL AGENTE | |
| Cuando la asesoría a un organismo electoral concreto supone trabajo sustantivo diferenciado, se registra como acción propia con su institución destinataria, y no dentro de esta acción agregada. | |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1660. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0363. |
Ejemplo 3 · Permanent availability recorded as a service
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Ongoing on-demand assistance in the areas of meaningful citizen participation and integrity of information ecosystems |
| Description as recorded | Provide technical assistance in regards to the global and regional information integrity offers, with a focus on swift identification and transfer of good practices |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1671) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Ongoing on demand assistance describes a state of availability, not a delivered service. What is recorded is the assistance actually provided in each reporting period, with the offices that requested it and the practices that were transferred. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de tiempo |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | On demand technical assistance to country offices on citizen participation and information integrity |
| Description | Technical assistance provided during the reporting period to the country offices that requested support on citizen participation and information integrity, including the transfer of good practices identified in the region. The action leaves the assistance delivered with the practices transferred. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Country offices requesting support on information integrity |
| Result or deliverable | Technical assistance delivered with good practices transferred |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1671. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0366. |
Ejemplo 4 · The description of a partnership used as the name
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Conflict transformation and human rights. To comprehensively support NHRIs, UNDP, OHCHR and GANHRI formed the TriPartite Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions in 2011. The TPP increases efficiency and effectiveness of international support for NHRIs and leverages complementary mandates |
| Description as recorded | The central purpose of this proposal is to strengthen the capabilities of the Ombudsperson Office to monitor trends in conflict and resulting human rights violations |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows across four countries (IDs 2581, 2872, 2873, 2874) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name contains the full institutional description of the partnership. Nobody can read a dashboard built on names like this one. The description does state the actual service, the strengthening of an ombudsperson office. The partnership moves to the partner fields and to the parent project. |
| Regla o criterio | Campo de nombre. Formulación como servicio prestado |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Strengthening of the Ombudsperson Offices for conflict and human rights monitoring |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the ombudsperson offices of the participating countries to strengthen their capacity to monitor conflict trends and the human rights violations that derive from them, within the Tripartite Partnership. The action leaves the monitoring capacities strengthened. |
| Service type | Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07) |
| Country, countries or region | Bolivia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Peru |
| Recipient | National ombudsperson offices |
| Result or deliverable | Monitoring capacities on conflict trends and human rights violations strengthened |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Tripartite Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2581, 2872, 2873 y 2874. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0450. |
Ejemplo 5 · A digital system deployed in seven countries
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Implementation of eMonitor+ (Bolivia) |
| Description as recorded | Implementation of the eMonitor+ system, a digital media analysis tool based on artificial intelligence, to expand access to data on the dynamics of toxic communication |
| Rows in the base | 7 rows across seven countries (IDs 2549, 2550, 2551, 2554, 2986, 2987, 2988) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Seven national deployments of the same system. This is the case where the team must decide. If each deployment required differentiated adaptation and accompaniment, each one is an action. If they followed the same protocol, rule 2 applies and there is one action. The recipients differ across countries, which suggests keeping the deployments that involved distinct institutional processes as separate actions. |
| Regla o criterio | Caso límite. Despliegue con adaptación diferenciada |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Implementation of the eMonitor+ media analysis system |
| Description | Deployment of the eMonitor+ system with the electoral and information integrity institutions of the participating countries, including the configuration of the analysis models. The action leaves the system in operation producing data on toxic communication and disinformation. |
| Service type | Innovation and digital transformation (F08) |
| Country, countries or region | Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru |
| Recipient | Electoral and information integrity institutions |
| Result or deliverable | System in operation producing data on toxic communication and disinformation |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | eMonitor+ |
| Status | Ongoing |
| NOTA PARA EL AGENTE | |
| Si en la carga del nuevo ciclo un despliegue nacional supone un proceso institucional propio, con su propio destinatario y su propio cierre, se registra como acción independiente y no dentro de esta. | |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2549, 2550, 2551, 2554, 2986, 2987 y 2988. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0573. |
Ejemplo 6 · Same service to different institutions stays separate
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Results-based management system for institutional priorities at Gobernación del Chaco (Argentina), and Results-based management for institutional priorities at the Fiscalía General de la Nación (Colombia) |
| Description as recorded | METAS, in both records |
| Rows in the base | 2 rows (IDs 1675 and 1676) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | These two records are the same product deployed in two institutions. They are not merged, because the recipient and the result are different in each case. The rule that removes the country from the identity of the action does not apply when the institutional process is specific to each recipient. |
| Regla o criterio | Criterio de no unificación dentro de un mismo país |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Deployment of the results based management system for institutional priorities at the Gobernación del Chaco |
| Description | Installation and start up of the METAS results based management system for the institutional priorities of the provincial government, including the training of the management team. The action leaves the system in operation. |
| Service type | Innovation and digital transformation (F08) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina |
| Recipient | Gobernación del Chaco |
| Result or deliverable | METAS system in operation with institutional priorities under management |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | PNUD SIGOB, product METAS |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Deployment of the results based management system for institutional priorities at the Fiscalía General de la Nación |
| Description | Installation and start up of the METAS results based management system for the institutional priorities of the prosecution service, including the training of the management team. The action leaves the system in operation. |
| Service type | Innovation and digital transformation (F08) |
| Country, countries or region | Colombia |
| Recipient | Fiscalía General de la Nación |
| Result or deliverable | METAS system in operation with institutional priorities under management |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | PNUD SIGOB, product METAS |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1675 y 1676. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-0516 y A-0515. |
Ejemplo 7 · Municipal support recorded once per municipality
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Strengthening of management capacities at the Municipalidad de Ahuachapán (El Salvador) |
| Description as recorded | SIGOBito ongoing support |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows across three countries (IDs 1710, 1711, 1712, 2222) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Four municipal deployments of the same product were grouped as one action because the service and the result are equivalent. The description ongoing support is the problem, since it announces no closing point. Each deployment concludes when the municipal team is trained and using the system. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 aplicada con cautela |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Strengthening of municipal management capacities through the SIGOBito system |
| Description | Installation of the SIGOBito management system in the participating municipalities and training of their management teams in its use. The action leaves each municipal team trained and using the system. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Dominican Republic, El Salvador |
| Recipient | Participating municipal governments |
| Result or deliverable | Municipal teams trained and using the management system |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | PNUD SIGOB, product SIGOBito |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1710, 1711, 1712 y 2222. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0424. |
Ejemplo 8 · Evidence production recorded once per country
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Information on violence against the LGBTQ+ population (Belize) |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 6 rows across four countries (IDs 1776 to 1781) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name is a noun phrase with the country appended and no verb. The four national measurements replicate one action. The record must state that what was produced is evidence, and for whom. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of evidence on violence against LGBTQ people |
| Description | Collection and analysis of data on violence against LGBTQ people in the participating countries, delivered to the institutions and civil society organizations that work on the issue. The action leaves the data and the analysis delivered. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, Panama |
| Recipient | National institutions and civil society organizations |
| Result or deliverable | Data and analysis on violence against LGBTQ people delivered |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | HIV and Health |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1776 a 1781. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0312. |
Ejemplo 9 · Technical assistance under a regional programme
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Technical Assistance for the production of systematic analyses of citizen security and violence against women and girls (INFOSEGURA) |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows, one per country (IDs 1927, 1928, 1969, 1970) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Four records for the same technical assistance service delivered under one regional programme. The programme goes to the parent project field and the countries to the scope attribute. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y regla 3 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance for the production of systematic analyses on citizen security and violence against women and girls |
| Description | Accompaniment to the national statistical and security institutions in the production of systematic analyses on citizen security and on violence against women and girls, strengthening their analytical capacity. The action leaves the analyses produced with the counterparts. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras |
| Recipient | National statistical and security institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Analytical capacities strengthened and analyses produced with the counterparts |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Gender |
| Parent project | INFOSEGURA |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1927, 1928, 1969 y 1970. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0389. |
Ejemplo 10 · Project formulation and launch
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Finalize and launch the new Regional Project on Access to Justice and Criminal Justice with EU |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1663) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Formulating and signing a project is programme design, F09. The subsequent implementation of that same project is a different action under F10. Rule 3 asks precisely for this decomposition by stage of the cycle, so that the project never appears as an action. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio. Formulación frente a implementación |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Formulation and launch of the regional project on access to justice and criminal justice with the European Union |
| Description | Preparation of the project document, negotiation with the donor and public launch of the regional project on access to justice and criminal justice. The action leaves the project document signed and the project launched. Its implementation is recorded as a separate action. |
| Service type | Programme design, formulation and scale-up (F09) |
| Country, countries or region | The Caribbean |
| Recipient | Justice institutions of the participating countries |
| Result or deliverable | Project document signed and project launched |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Regional project on access to justice and criminal justice, EU funded |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1663. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0598. |
Ejemplo 11 · A forum convened by UNDP
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | International Forum on Innovative Solutions to Strengthen Citizen Security and Access to Justice (INFOSEGURA) |
| Description as recorded | The Forum opened spaces to exchange information and best practices for enhancing citizen security and access to justice in Central America |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1965) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | A forum convened by UNDP is an action, unlike attendance at a forum convened by a third party. The record only needs an action noun at the beginning and the identification of the audience. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Convening of the International Forum on innovative solutions for citizen security and access to justice |
| Description | Convening and delivery of the international forum that brought together institutions of Central America and the Dominican Republic to exchange practices on citizen security and access to justice. The action leaves the forum held with a documented exchange of practices. |
| Service type | Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07) |
| Country, countries or region | Central America |
| Recipient | Security and justice institutions of Central America and the Dominican Republic |
| Result or deliverable | Forum held with documented exchange of practices |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | INFOSEGURA |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1965. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0443. |
Ejemplo 12 · A regional narrative and its working procedures
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Build an RBLAC narrative on information integrity, including an agenda and working procedures to support COs |
| Description as recorded | The narrative follows the five pillar information integrity offer developed by the corporate teams |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1659) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Defining a regional narrative with its agenda and its working procedures is strategic positioning, F01. The record is well bounded because the narrative is adopted at a given moment. It only needs an action noun at the beginning of the name. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Development of the RBLAC narrative and working procedures on information integrity |
| Description | Definition of the regional narrative on information integrity, of its agenda and of the working procedures that guide the support to country offices, following the five pillar corporate offer. The action leaves the narrative and the procedures adopted. |
| Service type | Strategic thinking and thought leadership (F01) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | LAC country offices and RBLAC teams |
| Result or deliverable | Narrative, agenda and working procedures adopted |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1659. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0293. |
Ejemplo 13 · A joint report with an external partner
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Research and data collection of socio-economic indicators of migrant integration in host communities and social cohesion |
| Description as recorded | Joint report with OECD which contains an overview of the integration of migrant and refugee populations in Latin America and the Caribbean |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1669) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name describes the internal process, research and data collection, and not the product. The description reveals that the deliverable is a joint report. The name must state the product and the partner belongs in the partner fields. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the joint report with OECD on the socioeconomic integration of migrants in host communities |
| Description | Preparation and publication of the joint report with OECD on the integration of migrant and refugee populations in the region, with quantitative and policy analysis. The action leaves the report published. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Migration authorities and regional policy audience |
| Result or deliverable | Joint report published with quantitative and policy analysis |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Governance |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | UNDP and OECD partnership |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1669. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0322. |
6.3 Gender
El equipo aportó 321 registros con 261 nombres distintos, 1,23 filas por acción. Su duplicación se concentra en los sellos de igualdad de género, tanto el corporativo como los nacionales, donde cada institución certificada o cada oficina de país generó una fila. Aparecen además dos patrones que el agente debe corregir. El primero es el registro de eventos, webinarios y participaciones en conferencias como si fueran acciones. El segundo es la duplicación por diferencias de escritura del mismo nombre, que el agente debe detectar antes de crear un registro nuevo.
13 pares de ejemplo
Ejemplo 1 · A certification programme recorded once per institution
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Implementation of the Gender Equality Seal for public institutions in Chile |
| Description as recorded | Gender Equality Seal for Public Institutions is a global initiative of UNDP to strengthen effective governance with a gender perspective |
| Rows in the base | 15 rows across fourteen countries (IDs 501 to 508, 1985 to 1988, 2611, 2876, 2879) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The country is inside the name and each national implementation produced its own row. The service, the certification protocol and the team are the same in all of them, so it is one action with the countries in scope. Where a specific institution required a differentiated adaptation, such as the case of public financial institutions in Panama, that adaptation is a separate action. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y criterio de destinatario |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Implementation of the Gender Equality Seal for public institutions |
| Description | Accompaniment of the public institutions of the participating countries through the certification cycle of the Gender Equality Seal, from the self assessment to the certification. The action leaves the participating institutions certified. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru |
| Recipient | Public institutions in the certification cycle |
| Result or deliverable | Participating institutions certified under the Seal |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Governance |
| Parent project | Gender Equality Seal for Public Institutions |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 501 a 508, 1985 a 1988, 2611, 2876 y 2879. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0270. |
Ejemplo 2 · Corporate certification cycle recorded per country office
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to COs to implement the UNDP Gender Equality Seal 2021-2023 |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 13 rows, one per country office (IDs 599 to 611) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Thirteen records for the same corporate certification cycle. The period is inside the name, where it does not belong, because the period is an attribute. One action with the twelve offices in scope and the period in its own field. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Support to country offices for the implementation of the UNDP Gender Equality Seal |
| Description | Accompaniment to the country offices during the corporate certification cycle of the Gender Equality Seal, including the self assessment, the action plan and the preparation of evidence. The action leaves the participating offices certified. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Jamaica, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay |
| Recipient | LAC country offices in the certification cycle |
| Result or deliverable | Country offices certified in the corporate Seal cycle |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | UNDP Gender Equality Seal |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 599 a 611. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0275. |
Ejemplo 3 · Duplication caused by a spelling difference
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Measurement of Gender Social Norms |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 11 rows across ten countries (IDs 474 to 483 and 2878) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Beyond the duplication by country, two of these rows are the same measurement entered twice with a small difference in the wording of the name. The agent must search for an equivalent action before creating a new one, and propose the update of the existing record instead of a new entry. |
| Regla o criterio | Detección de duplicados antes de crear el registro |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Measurement of gender social norms in the participating countries |
| Description | Application of the gender social norms measurement in the countries of the sample, with the processing of the data and the publication of the results. The action leaves the measurement produced and the results published. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Haiti, Mexico, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay |
| Recipient | National institutions of the countries covered and regional policy audience |
| Result or deliverable | Gender social norms measurement produced and results published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 474 a 483 y 2878. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0083. |
Ejemplo 4 · Strategic advisory to offices recorded ten times
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Strategic advice to develop the Gender Equality Strategy in Country Office |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 10 rows across nine countries (IDs 2035 to 2042, 2518, 2519) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Continuous advisory to country offices on the same theme is recorded as one action per reporting period and per theme, with the status updated, and not once per exchange or once per office. Two of these rows are also duplicates caused by differences in wording. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y caso límite de asesoría continua |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Strategic advisory to country offices for the development of their gender equality strategies |
| Description | Accompaniment to the country offices in the formulation of their gender equality strategy, from the diagnostic to the approval of the document. The action leaves an approved strategy per participating office. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela |
| Recipient | Country offices developing their gender equality strategies |
| Result or deliverable | Country office gender equality strategy approved |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2035 a 2042, 2518 y 2519. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0146. |
Ejemplo 5 · The number of countries written into the name
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Implementation of National Seals / National Gender Programs for the Private Sector in 7 countries |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 7 rows, one per country (IDs 519 to 525) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name announces seven countries and the record was still entered seven times. The count of countries does not belong in the name either, because it changes as the programme grows and the dashboard obtains it from the scope attribute. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Implementation of the national gender seals for the private sector |
| Description | Accompaniment of the national gender seal programmes for private companies in the participating countries, from the design of the national scheme to the certification of the first cohort of companies. The action leaves the national seals operating with certified companies. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Panama, Paraguay, Peru |
| Recipient | Private companies and national certifying institutions |
| Result or deliverable | National seals operating with certified companies |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Inclusive Growth |
| Parent project | Gender Equality Seal for the Private Sector |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 519 a 525. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0269. |
Ejemplo 6 · A digital tool deployed in several countries
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support the implementation of the care services georeferencing tool in Lima Metropolitana |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 6 rows across six countries (IDs 533, 2278, 2279, 2280, 2563, 2564) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Six national deployments of the same tool were recorded separately. The criterion is that the development of the tool is one action and each deployment is an action only when it requires differentiated adaptation and accompaniment. Since these deployments followed the same protocol, they become one action with the countries in scope. |
| Regla o criterio | Caso límite. Desarrollo y despliegue de una herramienta |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Implementation of the care services georeferencing tool |
| Description | Deployment of the care services georeferencing tool with the responsible authorities of each participating territory, including the loading of the local care supply. The action leaves the tool in operation with the care services mapped. |
| Service type | Innovation and digital transformation (F08) |
| Country, countries or region | Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru |
| Recipient | Care system authorities of the participating territories |
| Result or deliverable | Georeferencing tool in operation with mapped care services |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 533, 2278, 2279, 2280, 2563 y 2564. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0258. |
Ejemplo 7 · A training programme with several national cohorts
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Training project on care, gender and rights in cooperation with FLACSO-PRIGEPP and the Open Society Foundation |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 5 rows, one per country (IDs 574, 1895 to 1898) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | One training programme with participants from five countries generated five records. The rule for training is one action per programme and period, with the cohorts and the countries as attributes. The partners move to the partner fields. |
| Regla o criterio | Caso límite. Cohortes en un mismo período |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of the training programme on care, gender and rights |
| Description | Delivery of the training programme on care, gender and rights for public officials and civil society, developed with FLACSO PRIGEPP and the Open Society Foundation. The action leaves the programme completed with certified participants from the countries covered. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico |
| Recipient | Public officials and civil society organizations |
| Result or deliverable | Training programme completed with certified participants |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 574, 1895, 1896, 1897 y 1898. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0206. |
Ejemplo 8 · Two webinars recorded as two actions
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Organization of a webinar in the framework of the Time Week in LAC in collaboration with BTUI, and Webinar to promote inclusion in Central Banks |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato en ambos registros |
| Rows in the base | 2 rows (IDs 573 and 582) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | A webinar on its own is a means of execution. These two qualify as actions because each disseminated substantive content to an identified audience and left documented conclusions. When several webinars form a single series with one purpose, they are recorded as one action with the sessions as milestones. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of the webinar on time use within Time Week in Latin America and the Caribbean |
| Description | Organization and delivery of the webinar on time use held within Time Week, in collaboration with BTUI, addressed to statistical offices and care policy institutions. The action leaves the webinar held with documented conclusions. |
| Service type | Advocacy, communications and visibility (F03) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Statistical offices and care policy institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Webinar held with documented conclusions |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of the webinar on gender inclusion in central banks |
| Description | Organization and delivery of the webinar addressed to central banks of the region on gender inclusion in their institutional practices. The action leaves the webinar held with the participating institutions engaged. |
| Service type | Advocacy, communications and visibility (F03) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Central banks of the region |
| Result or deliverable | Webinar held with participating institutions |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Inclusive Growth |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 573 y 582. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-0124 y A-0123. |
Ejemplo 9 · Participation in an intergovernmental process
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support UNDP participation in the CSW 66, this year will focus on climate change. This includes support in the design and implementation of the high-level event and thematic events |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 489) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Attending an intergovernmental session is not an action. Designing and delivering the events that UNDP contributed to it is. The record is reformulated around that substantive contribution, which is what has a deliverable and a closing point. |
| Regla o criterio | Caso límite. Foros de terceros |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Substantive contribution of UNDP to the high level and thematic events of CSW 66 on climate change |
| Description | Design and delivery of the high level event and of the thematic events contributed by UNDP to the sixty sixth session of the Commission on the Status of Women, devoted to climate change. The action leaves the events delivered with UNDP substantive inputs. |
| Service type | Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Member States and partners participating in CSW 66 |
| Result or deliverable | High level and thematic events designed and delivered with UNDP inputs |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Environment Team |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 489. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0249. |
Ejemplo 10 · Validation of studies and their regional dissemination
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Validation and final approval of the 8 multidimensional studies on femicide and socialization of results, findings and recommendations in at least 3 regional spaces |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 470) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record joins the production and validation of eight studies, which is knowledge production, with their dissemination in regional spaces, which is advocacy and visibility. They are two service types and therefore two linked actions. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Validation and publication of the eight multidimensional studies on femicide |
| Description | Technical validation with the justice sector institutions and publication of the eight multidimensional studies on femicide. The action leaves the eight studies validated and published. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Justice sector institutions in Latin America |
| Result or deliverable | Eight studies validated and published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Governance |
| Parent project | Spotlight Initiative Latin America Regional Programme |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Dissemination of the findings of the studies on femicide in regional spaces |
| Description | Presentation of the results, findings and recommendations of the eight studies in at least three regional spaces, with the corresponding dissemination materials. The action leaves the findings socialized with the target audiences. |
| Service type | Advocacy, communications and visibility (F03) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Justice sector institutions and regional audience |
| Result or deliverable | Findings presented in at least three regional spaces |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Governance |
| Parent project | Spotlight Initiative Latin America Regional Programme |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 470. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0115, que en el nuevo ciclo se carga como dos acciones. |
Ejemplo 11 · A course cohort well formulated
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Implementation of the 4rd cohort of the virtual course Keys to gender equality |
| Description as recorded | This online course for civil servants aims to contribute to the reflection on what it means to integrate the gender perspective |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 500) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record identifies one service type, one audience, one cohort and one closing point. The only correction needed is the typing error in the cohort number and the addition of the deliverable in the description. Each cohort is a distinct action because each has its own period and its own participants. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of the fourth cohort of the virtual course Keys to gender equality for public servants |
| Description | Delivery of the fourth cohort of the virtual course addressed to public servants on the integration of the gender perspective into institutional practice. The action leaves the cohort completed with certified participants. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Public servants |
| Result or deliverable | Fourth cohort completed with certified participants |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 500. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0197. |
Ejemplo 12 · A community of practice, not a meeting
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Community of practice of public institutions implementing Gender Seal |
| Description as recorded | Meeting place for public institutions to exchange learning and experiences on gender equality policies |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 513) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | A community of practice is knowledge management and peer exchange, F06, and not multi stakeholder convening, F07. The distinction is that its participants are peers who exchange learning on a sustained basis, and not actors convened for a dialogue with a defined outcome. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio. Elección entre F06 y F07 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Coordination of the community of practice of public institutions implementing the Gender Equality Seal |
| Description | Coordination and animation of the community of practice that brings together the certified institutions and those in the certification process, for the exchange of learning on gender equality policies. The action leaves the community in operation with documented exchanges. |
| Service type | Knowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Public institutions certified or in certification |
| Result or deliverable | Community of practice in operation with documented exchanges |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Gender Equality Seal for Public Institutions |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 513. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0228. |
Ejemplo 13 · Communication strategy with its own products
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Communication strategy and data visualization to position GES results with LAC institutions |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 510) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | This is the case in which communication does become an action of its own, because it has its own products, its own audience and its own closing point. It is separate from the implementation of the Seal, which is a different action under F10. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio. Comunicación como acción propia |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of the communication strategy and data visualization to position the results of the Gender Equality Seal |
| Description | Design and execution of the communication strategy and of the data visualization products that present the results of the Gender Equality Seal to public and private institutions of the region. The action leaves the strategy executed with the visualization products published. |
| Service type | Advocacy, communications and visibility (F03) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Public and private institutions of the region |
| Result or deliverable | Communication strategy executed with data visualization products |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Gender |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Gender Equality Seal for Public Institutions |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 510. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0119. |
6.4 SDG & Policy
El equipo aportó 200 registros con 138 nombres distintos. Su volumen se concentra en la producción de conocimiento, y en particular en dos series editoriales, Policy Documents y Working Papers, más las encuestas regionales. Su distorsión principal es la encuesta de hogares de alta frecuencia, que aparece 25 veces, la mayor duplicación de toda la base. El segundo patrón es el título de publicación cargado tal cual, sin verbo y sin resultado, y con los países que cubre incrustados en el título.
13 pares de ejemplo
Ejemplo 1 · The most duplicated record in the whole base
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | High-frequency household surveys |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 25 rows, one per country (IDs 235 and 240 to 263) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | One survey operation with a single methodology and a single team was recorded twenty five times, once per country covered. This is the single most severe distortion in the base and it is corrected entirely by rule 2. The name also lacks a verb and the record lacks any statement of what is delivered. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Implementation of the high frequency household surveys to monitor socioeconomic conditions in the region |
| Description | Design, fielding and processing of the high frequency household survey rounds in the countries covered, with the release of the microdata and of the analytical reports. The action leaves the microdata and the reports available for each round. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Lucia, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Countries covered by the survey rounds and regional policy audience |
| Result or deliverable | Survey microdata and analytical reports released |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 235 y 240 a 263. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1355. |
Ejemplo 2 · A study series recorded once per country studied
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Social Protection Systems studies, using methodological approach put forth by the RHDR 2021 |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 12 rows, one per country (IDs 279 to 290) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | One methodology applied to twelve national studies produced twelve records. The methodological approach and the team are the same, so this is one action with the twelve countries in scope and the published studies as the deliverable. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the national social protection system studies applying the RHDR 2021 methodology |
| Description | Preparation of the national social protection system studies using the methodological approach of the Regional Human Development Report 2021, in the countries covered by the series. The action leaves the national studies published. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru |
| Recipient | Social protection institutions of the countries covered and regional policy audience |
| Result or deliverable | National social protection system studies published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Inclusive Growth |
| Parent project | Regional Human Development Report 2021 follow up |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 279 a 290. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1358. |
Ejemplo 3 · A regional survey with a title instead of a name
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | A better world for migrants: Perceptions around migration |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 10 rows, one per country (IDs 264 to 273) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record uses the title of the publication as the name of the action, and it was replicated once per country covered. The action is the production of the survey and the title belongs inside the name as the identifier of the product, preceded by an action noun. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y unidad de propósito |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the regional perception survey on migration A better world for migrants |
| Description | Design, fielding and analysis of the regional perception survey on migration, covering the countries of the sample, and publication of the resulting report. The action leaves a published survey report. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago |
| Recipient | Migration authorities of the countries covered and regional policy audience |
| Result or deliverable | Published perception survey report on migration |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Governance |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 264 a 273. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1360. |
Ejemplo 4 · A service named after the tool it uses
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Monitoring service with Twitter |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 6 rows (IDs 216 to 221) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name identifies a data source and not a service. What the team produced was a monitoring service on social media data for regional development analysis, with periodic reports. The tool moves into the description. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de propósito |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the social media monitoring service for regional development analysis |
| Description | Operation of the monitoring service based on social media data, with the delivery of periodic reports to the regional teams and country offices that use them. The action leaves the periodic reports delivered for each round. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Panama, Venezuela |
| Recipient | UNDP regional teams and country offices |
| Result or deliverable | Periodic monitoring reports based on social media data |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 216 a 221. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1356. |
Ejemplo 5 · A theme recorded as an action
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Social Protection Focalization |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 3 rows (IDs 230, 231, 232) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name is a theme. It does not say what was produced or for whom. The work behind these rows was analytical evidence on targeting delivered to social protection authorities, which is what the record must state. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 5. Techo de agregación |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of analytical evidence on social protection targeting for national programmes |
| Description | Analysis of the targeting mechanisms of the national social protection programmes, delivered to the responsible authorities through the country offices. The action leaves a targeting analysis delivered to the counterpart. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Chile, Mexico |
| Recipient | Social protection authorities through country offices |
| Result or deliverable | Targeting analysis delivered to the national counterpart |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Inclusive Growth |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 230, 231 y 232. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1357. |
Ejemplo 6 · A single publication entered three times
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Policy Note No 31 – Gobernanza preventiva y anticipatoria para el litio en Bolivia |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 3 rows (IDs 3042, 3044, 3051) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | One publication was entered three times, most likely once per reporting moment. Under rule 6 an action that spans several periods keeps its identifier and is updated through the status field. It is not entered again. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 6. Continuidad entre períodos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Publication of Policy Note 31 on preventive and anticipatory governance of lithium in Bolivia |
| Description | Preparation, editing and publication of Policy Note 31 of the regional series, addressed to the regional policy audience and to the institutions responsible for lithium governance. The action leaves the note published and available. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Bolivia |
| Recipient | Regional policy audience and national institutions on lithium governance |
| Result or deliverable | Policy Note 31 published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Environment Team |
| Parent project | UNDP LAC Policy Note Series |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 3042, 3044 y 3051. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1416. |
Ejemplo 7 · Countries embedded in the title of a paper
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Working Paper No 37 – Labour income inequality in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico: 2012–2019 |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 277) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | This record was not duplicated, and it still shows the pattern the rule addresses. The five countries are part of the title of the publication and they must also be recorded in the scope attribute, so that the dashboard can count coverage without reading titles. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 aplicada al alcance de una publicación |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Publication of Working Paper 37 on labour income inequality in five countries of the region |
| Description | Preparation and publication of Working Paper 37, which analyses labour income inequality between 2012 and 2019 in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. The action leaves the paper published. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico |
| Recipient | Regional policy audience |
| Result or deliverable | Working Paper 37 published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | UNDP LAC Working Paper Series |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 277. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1435. |
Ejemplo 8 · An editorial series and its parent project
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Policy Note No14 – Mapping Care: Innovative tools for georeferencing care supply and demand in Latin America and the Caribbean |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2067) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Each note of the series is one action because each one has its own product and its own closing point. The series is not an action, it is the container, and it belongs in the parent project field. This is the same logic that rule 3 applies to projects. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 3. El proyecto es contenedor |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Publication of Policy Note 14 on innovative tools for georeferencing care supply and demand |
| Description | Preparation and publication of Policy Note 14 of the regional series, addressed to the institutions responsible for care policies in the region. The action leaves the note published. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Care policy institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Policy Note 14 published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Gender |
| Parent project | UNDP LAC Policy Note Series |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2067. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1399. |
Ejemplo 9 · Participation in a forum convened by others
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | XIII Forum for Sustainable Development in LAC |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 225) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Attending a forum convened by a third party is not an action. It becomes one only when UNDP contributes a substantive product, such as a report, a session designed by the team or a technical input for the negotiation. The record is reformulated in those terms and, if there was no such product, it is not recorded. |
| Regla o criterio | Caso límite. Foros de terceros |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Substantive contribution of UNDP to the XIII Forum for Sustainable Development in Latin America and the Caribbean |
| Description | Preparation and presentation of the substantive inputs contributed by UNDP to the Forum, addressed to Member States and to the United Nations system. The action leaves the inputs presented and documented in the Forum proceedings. |
| Service type | Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Member States and United Nations system |
| Result or deliverable | UNDP substantive inputs presented at the Forum |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 225. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1483. |
Ejemplo 10 · Roundtable series convened by the team
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Fourth Sector Roundtables |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 5 rows, one per country (IDs 209 to 213) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | A series of roundtables held in five countries within the same regional exercise generated five records. The convening service, the audience and the objective are the same, so it is one action with the five countries in scope and the documented conclusions as the deliverable. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 aplicada a una serie de eventos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Convening of the Fourth Sector Roundtables with regional private sector and social economy actors |
| Description | Convening and delivery of the roundtable series with fourth sector actors in the participating countries, with the systematization of the conclusions of each session. The action leaves the series held with documented conclusions. |
| Service type | Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico |
| Recipient | Fourth sector actors, private sector and social economy organizations |
| Result or deliverable | Roundtable series held with documented conclusions |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Inclusive Growth |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 209 a 213. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1481. |
Ejemplo 11 · Two conferences inside a longer programme
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Capacity building on public administration Government of Cuba |
| Description as recorded | 2 conferences in performance-based budgeting diploma |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2959) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Two conferences delivered inside a diploma programme are close to the materiality threshold. They qualify as an action because they are the contribution of the team to a structured programme and they leave a defined product, the delivered modules. Had it been a single lecture, it would have been a milestone. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of capacity building on performance based budgeting for public officials of the Government |
| Description | Delivery of the two conferences contributed by the team to the performance based budgeting diploma addressed to public officials. The action leaves the two modules delivered within the programme. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Cuba |
| Recipient | Public officials of the Government |
| Result or deliverable | Two conferences delivered within the budgeting diploma |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2959. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1479. |
Ejemplo 12 · Publication and launch in the same action
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Publication Crecimiento e Innovación en Tiempos Inciertos en América Latina |
| Description as recorded | Book published during the SEGIB Summit 2023 in Dominican Republic |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2130) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record is well formulated. The launch at the summit is a milestone of the publication and not a separate action, because it did not generate communication products of its own. It only needs an action noun at the beginning of the name. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Publication of the book Crecimiento e Innovación en Tiempos Inciertos en América Latina |
| Description | Preparation, editing and publication of the book, launched during the 2023 SEGIB Summit. The launch is a milestone of this action. The action leaves the book published and publicly available. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Regional policy audience and SEGIB Summit participants |
| Result or deliverable | Book published and launched at the 2023 SEGIB Summit |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2130. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1477. |
Ejemplo 13 · A data note of a recurring series
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Graph For Thought – (Still) Under the Mattress: LAC Incomplete Bancarization |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 2 rows (IDs 2998 and 2999) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The same edition of the series was entered twice. Each edition is one action, the series is the parent container, and repeated entries across reporting moments are avoided by updating the status instead of creating a new record. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 6 y proyecto contenedor |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Publication of the Graph for Thought edition on incomplete financial inclusion in the region |
| Description | Preparation and publication of the edition of the data analysis series devoted to incomplete financial inclusion in Latin America and the Caribbean. The action leaves the note published. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Regional policy audience |
| Result or deliverable | Data analysis note published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG & Policy |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Graph for Thought series |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2998 y 2999. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1461. |
6.5 Inclusive Growth
El equipo aportó 176 registros con 77 nombres distintos, 2,29 filas por acción, el segundo promedio más alto de la base. Casi toda esa duplicación proviene de la cartera de financiamiento del desarrollo, donde cada servicio prestado a las oficinas de país se registró una vez por país. Ocho acciones concentran 86 filas. El segundo patrón del equipo es el nombre que empieza con Support to the CO, que describe una relación y no un servicio, y que obliga al agente a preguntar qué se entregó y qué quedó instalado.
13 pares de ejemplo
Ejemplo 1 · The most duplicated financing service of the team
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to the CO for the design and implementation of government-led Integrated National Financing Framework (INFF) or INFF component |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 14 rows, one per country (IDs 118 to 129, 2147 and 2148) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The same service was recorded fourteen times because fourteen country offices received it. The name also describes a relationship with the office rather than the service delivered to the government. The action is the accompaniment for the establishment of the framework and its result is the framework or component adopted. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Support to country offices for the establishment of government led Integrated National Financing Frameworks |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the country offices and to their national finance counterparts for the design and implementation of the Integrated National Financing Framework or of one of its components. The action leaves the framework or the component adopted by the government. |
| Service type | Resource mobilization and development finance (F11) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Belize, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Grenada, Guatemala, Haiti, Jamaica, Mexico, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Country offices and ministries of finance with INFF processes |
| Result or deliverable | INFF or INFF component adopted by the government |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Tax and Development Finance portfolio |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 118 a 129, 2147 y 2148. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0716. |
Ejemplo 2 · Two services under one name, product and event
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to the CO through SDG Investor Map and SDG Investment Facilitation events |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 14 rows, one per country (IDs 164 to 177) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record joins the production of an investor map, which is a knowledge product, with the delivery of investment facilitation events, which is convening. In the historical base both were kept together because they belong to a single development finance service. For the new cycle the recommendation is to split them, since the map has its own publication and the events have their own audience and their own closing point. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 1 aplicada con criterio |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the SDG Investor Maps with country offices |
| Description | Preparation and publication of the SDG Investor Map with the country offices and the national private sector actors, identifying investment opportunities aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals. The action leaves a published map per country. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Country offices and national private sector actors |
| Result or deliverable | SDG Investor Map published in each participating country |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | SDG Investor Map |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of the SDG investment facilitation events with country offices |
| Description | Organization and delivery of the investment facilitation events that connect the opportunities identified in the maps with private investors. The action leaves the events held with documented investment interest. |
| Service type | Resource mobilization and development finance (F11) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Country offices, national private sector actors and investors |
| Result or deliverable | Investment facilitation events held with documented investor interest |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | SDG Investor Map |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 164 a 177. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0718, que en el nuevo ciclo se recomienda cargar como dos acciones. |
Ejemplo 3 · Global programme rolled out country by country
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to the CO for the Tax Inspectors without Borders programme |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 13 rows, one per country (IDs 147 to 159) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | A single corporate programme generated thirteen records. The programme is the container and the service is the accompaniment for its rollout with the national tax administrations. One action, with the countries as scope and the programme as parent project. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y regla 3 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Support to country offices for the rollout of the Tax Inspectors Without Borders programme |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the country offices and to the national tax administrations for the establishment and operation of the Tax Inspectors Without Borders programme. The action leaves the programme operating with the tax administration of each participating country. |
| Service type | Resource mobilization and development finance (F11) |
| Country, countries or region | Aruba, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Paraguay, Peru |
| Recipient | National tax administrations through country offices |
| Result or deliverable | TIWB programme operating with the national tax administration |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Tax Inspectors Without Borders |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 147 a 159. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0719. |
Ejemplo 4 · Advisory service duplicated across thirteen countries
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to the CO on thematic debt instruments and debt management |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 13 rows, one per country (IDs 188 to 197, 2146, 2150 and 2978) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Thirteen records for one advisory service. The record also lacks a result. Advisory on debt is not concluded by the fact of advising, it is concluded when the government adopts an instrument or a management measure. That is what the description must state. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Advisory support to country offices on thematic debt instruments and public debt management |
| Description | Technical advice to the country offices and to the ministries of finance on the design of thematic debt instruments and on public debt management measures. The action leaves an instrument or a management measure adopted by the government. |
| Service type | Resource mobilization and development finance (F11) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Paraguay, Suriname, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Ministries of finance through country offices |
| Result or deliverable | Thematic debt instrument or debt management measure adopted by the government |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Tax and Development Finance portfolio |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 188 a 197, 2146, 2150 y 2978. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0712. |
Ejemplo 5 · Standard assessment applied in ten countries
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to the CO for conducting a Development Finance Assessment (DFA) |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 10 rows, one per country (IDs 130 to 139) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The Development Finance Assessment is a standard instrument applied with the same methodology in each country. Since there is no differentiated methodological adaptation, rule 2 applies and the ten records become one action. If a country had required a substantially adapted methodology, that adaptation would be a separate action. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y caso límite de instrumentos replicables |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Support to country offices for conducting Development Finance Assessments |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the country offices in the application of the Development Finance Assessment methodology and in the validation of its results with the government. The action leaves a completed and validated assessment per country. |
| Service type | Resource mobilization and development finance (F11) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Barbados, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Grenada, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Recipient | Country offices conducting the assessments |
| Result or deliverable | Development Finance Assessment completed and validated with the government |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Tax and Development Finance portfolio |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 130 a 139. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0714. |
Ejemplo 6 · Budget support duplicated by country
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to the CO for Budgeting for the SDGs |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 9 rows, one per country (IDs 140 to 146, 2149 and 2151) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Nine records for one methodological service delivered to ministries of finance. The name says support and not what was delivered. The result is the application of the methodology to the national budget cycle. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Support to country offices for budgeting for the SDGs processes with national finance authorities |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the country offices and to the ministries of finance in the application of the SDG budgeting methodology to the national budget cycle. The action leaves the methodology applied to the budget cycle. |
| Service type | Resource mobilization and development finance (F11) |
| Country, countries or region | Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Haiti, Jamaica, Panama, Paraguay, Peru |
| Recipient | Ministries of finance through country offices |
| Result or deliverable | SDG budgeting methodology applied to the national budget cycle |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Tax and Development Finance portfolio |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 140 a 146, 2149 y 2151. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0713. |
Ejemplo 7 · Methodological support classified as advisory and not as finance
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to the CO for SDG Impact Measurement and Management |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 8 rows, one per country (IDs 2152 to 2159) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | This record sits close to the finance portfolio and yet its service is different. What the team transferred was a measurement and management approach, which is technical assistance and not resource mobilization. The agent must choose the service type by what was delivered, not by the portfolio the work belongs to. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio. Elección del tipo correcto |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance to country offices on SDG impact measurement and management |
| Description | Transfer of the SDG impact measurement and management standards to the country offices so that they can apply them in their portfolios. The action leaves the approach applied by the office. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica, Paraguay, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Country offices applying the SDG impact standards |
| Result or deliverable | Impact measurement and management approach applied by the country office |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | SDG Impact |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2152 a 2159. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0684. |
Ejemplo 8 · Programme formulation recorded per country
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to the CO for the Joint SDG Fund Component 2 programmes (blended finance) |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 5 rows, one per country (IDs 178 to 182) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Five records for one formulation service delivered under the same fund. The fund is a funding attribute and the action is the design of the blended finance programme submitted to it. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y regla 3 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Support to country offices for the design of blended finance programmes under Joint SDG Fund Component 2 |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the country offices in the formulation of the blended finance programmes presented to Component 2 of the Joint SDG Fund. The action leaves the programme formulated and submitted to the fund. |
| Service type | Programme design, formulation and scale-up (F09) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Grenada, Jamaica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Country offices with Joint SDG Fund programmes |
| Result or deliverable | Blended finance programme formulated and submitted to the Fund |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Joint SDG Fund Component 2 |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 178 a 182. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0715. En el registro original el tipo de servicio quedó clasificado como financiamiento. Al reescribirlo se observa que el servicio es la formulación, de modo que corresponde F09. |
Ejemplo 9 · Same methodology transferred with different depth
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Transfer of the InMotion methodology. SDG Value Chains Programme |
| Description as recorded | Four rows carry variants of this name. One is a phase one training course in the Dominican Republic, one is national capacity building in Cuba, one is capacity building plus pilot implementation in Chile, and one transfers a different pair of methodologies in Paraguay. |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows (IDs 299, 306, 2777, 2761) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | These records are not duplicates. Each one has a different recipient, a different scope and a different closing point, so they remain separate actions. The Chile record does need to be split, because it combines training with a pilot implementation and those are two service types. |
| Regla o criterio | Criterio de no unificación y regla 1 |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of national training on the InMotion methodology for value chain institutions |
| Description | Training of the national institutions that support micro, small and medium enterprises in the InMotion methodology. The action leaves national teams trained in the methodology. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Cuba |
| Recipient | National institutions supporting MSMEs |
| Result or deliverable | Training delivered with trained national teams |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | SDG Value Chains Programme |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Pilot implementation of the InMotion methodology with national institutions and enterprises |
| Description | Pilot application of the InMotion methodology with the national institutions and the enterprises that participated in the training, with documentation of the results of the pilot. The action leaves the methodology tested in the national context. |
| Service type | Innovation and digital transformation (F08) |
| Country, countries or region | Chile |
| Recipient | National institutions and MSMEs |
| Result or deliverable | Methodology piloted with documented results |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | SDG Value Chains Programme |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 306 y 2777. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-0689 y A-0693, esta última dividida en dos para el nuevo ciclo. |
Ejemplo 10 · Regional narrative and offer
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Develop a consolidated regional narrative and offer on territorial development and SDG localization |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2493) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Defining a regional narrative and a service offer is strategic positioning, which is F01 and not policy advice. The record is well bounded because the narrative is approved at a given point. It only needs a description and a recipient. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Development of the consolidated regional narrative and offer on territorial development and SDG localization |
| Description | Definition of the regional narrative and of the associated service offer on territorial development and SDG localization, for use by RBLAC and the country offices. The action leaves an approved narrative and service offer. |
| Service type | Strategic thinking and thought leadership (F01) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | RBLAC and LAC country offices |
| Result or deliverable | Regional narrative and service offer approved |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2493. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0648. |
Ejemplo 11 · Partnership mobilization with committed resources
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Mobilize decentralized cooperation partnerships in support to territorial development, local economic development and SDG localization initiatives in countries |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2496) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record could be read as resource mobilization because it mentions partnerships that bring resources. It is classified as convening and partnerships because the deliverable is the partnership agreement itself. When the deliverable is the funding secured for a specific initiative, the service type is resource mobilization. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio. Alianza frente a movilización |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Mobilization of decentralized cooperation partnerships for territorial development and SDG localization |
| Description | Identification and formalization of partnerships with decentralized cooperation actors to support territorial development and SDG localization initiatives in the participating countries. The action leaves partnership agreements established with committed resources. |
| Service type | Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Decentralized cooperation partners and participating countries |
| Result or deliverable | Partnership agreements established with committed resources |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2496. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0700. |
Ejemplo 12 · Monitoring of a programme, not of a policy
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Monitoring and systematization of support to MSMEs in the region. SDG Value Chain Programme |
| Description as recorded | Standardised data collection of implementation of SDG Value Chain Programme |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 294) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record is about monitoring the team own programme, which is monitoring, evaluation and learning. It should not be confused with the implementation of the programme, which is a different action under F10. The distinction matters because the two are counted separately. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio. Elección entre F12 y F10 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Monitoring and systematization of the MSME support delivered under the SDG Value Chains Programme |
| Description | Standardized collection of implementation data of the SDG Value Chains Programme and systematization of the support delivered to micro, small and medium enterprises. The action leaves a standardized monitoring dataset and a systematization report. |
| Service type | Monitoring, evaluation and learning (F12) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Programme management and participating country offices |
| Result or deliverable | Standardized monitoring dataset and systematization report |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | SDG Value Chains Programme |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 294. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0728. |
Ejemplo 13 · Local technical assistance well formulated
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Accelerate SDG localization in the city of Cuenca, Ecuador |
| Description as recorded | Provision of technical support in the process of elaborating a participatory Voluntary Local Review |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2498) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name states a purpose, accelerating localization, which does not close. The description states the actual service, the accompaniment for the Voluntary Local Review. The correction consists of moving the service into the name and the purpose into the description. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance to the city of Cuenca for the elaboration of its participatory Voluntary Local Review |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the municipality in the participatory process of elaborating the Voluntary Local Review, as a contribution to the acceleration of SDG localization in the city. The action leaves an elaborated review. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Ecuador |
| Recipient | Municipality of Cuenca |
| Result or deliverable | Voluntary Local Review elaborated |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Inclusive Growth |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2498. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0686. |
6.6 Disaster Risk Reduction
El equipo tiene la base más limpia de los ocho, con 80 registros y 80 nombres distintos, es decir una fila por acción. Además es el único equipo sin registros vacíos en el campo de descripción. Sus ejemplos sirven menos para corregir duplicación y más para enseñar dos cosas. La primera es cuándo un mismo servicio prestado en países distintos se unifica y cuándo no. La segunda es cómo separar la formación del ejercicio práctico que la acompaña.
12 pares de ejemplo
Ejemplo 1 · A subregional programme recorded once per country
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Recovery Preparedness in the Caribbean – EUCARES Belize |
| Description as recorded | Capacity strengthening of 06 prioritized country offices through a 3 year programme: Belize (other countries: Cuba, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Jamaica, and Saint Vincent & the Grenadines) |
| Rows in the base | 6 rows, one per country (IDs 3032 to 3037) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The description itself declares that this is one three year programme covering six country offices, and yet the record was entered six times with the country appended to the name. One action with the six countries in the scope attribute. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of recovery preparedness capacity strengthening under EUCARES |
| Description | Three year capacity strengthening programme on recovery preparedness for the six prioritized country offices and their national institutions. The action leaves the recovery preparedness capacities strengthened in the participating offices. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Belize, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Jamaica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Recipient | Country offices and national institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Recovery preparedness capacities strengthened in the six country offices |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | EUCARES |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 3032 a 3037. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0033. |
Ejemplo 2 · One regional workshop recorded once per participating country
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Training Cuba Government officials in Risk-informed development |
| Description as recorded | Representatives from the Government of Cuba and UNDP focal points participated in a training workshop held in Panama, June 2023. Within this training, the country experiences from Cuba, Colombia, Costa Rica and others were shared. |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows (IDs 2138 to 2141) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | A single workshop held in Panama was recorded once for each country whose officials attended. The rule for training programmes is one action per programme and period, with the countries and the cohorts as attributes. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y caso límite de cohortes |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of the training workshop on risk informed development for government officials |
| Description | Regional training workshop on risk informed development delivered to government officials and UNDP focal points of the participating countries, with an exchange of country experiences. The action leaves the officials trained in the methodology. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Panama |
| Recipient | Government officials and UNDP focal points |
| Result or deliverable | Officials trained in the risk informed development methodology |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2138, 2139, 2140 y 2141. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0042. |
Ejemplo 3 · Same service in different countries that must stay separate
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Training in disaster recovery needs assessment (PDNA) methodology in Costa Rica, and Training in disaster recovery needs assessment (PDNA) and management framework (DRF) in Colombia |
| Description as recorded | In Costa Rica a team of public servants from sectoral institutions was trained. In Colombia the training was delivered with the National Disaster Risk Management Unit and the National Planning Department. |
| Rows in the base | 2 rows (IDs 1816 and 1817) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | These two records look like the same service repeated by country, and yet they must not be merged. Each one has its own recipient institution, its own agreed content and its own closing point. Rule 2 removes the country from the identity of the action only when the service, the recipient and the result are the same. Here the recipient differs, so there are two actions. |
| Regla o criterio | Criterio de no unificación. Destinatario y resultado distintos |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of training on the post disaster needs assessment methodology in Costa Rica |
| Description | Training of a team of public servants from sectoral institutions in the post disaster needs assessment methodology. The action leaves a trained sectoral team available for future assessments. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Costa Rica |
| Recipient | Public servants of sectoral institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Sectoral team trained in the PDNA methodology |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of training on the post disaster needs assessment and recovery framework methodologies in Colombia |
| Description | Training of government officials in both methodologies, delivered jointly with the National Disaster Risk Management Unit and the National Planning Department. The action leaves the officials of both institutions trained. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Colombia |
| Recipient | National Disaster Risk Management Unit and National Planning Department |
| Result or deliverable | Government officials of both institutions trained |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1816 y 1817. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-0045 y A-0043. |
Ejemplo 4 · Training and simulation exercise in one record
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Training in disaster recovery needs assessment (PDNA) and support to disaster simulation and drill exercise in Panama |
| Description as recorded | PDNA/DRF training and simulation exercise developed in Panama in May and June 2023 |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1984) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The simulation exercise is the practical component of the training and it does not leave a product of its own. It is a milestone of the training action and not a second action. The record stays as one and the exercise moves into the description. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 4. El hito no es una acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of training on post disaster needs assessment in Panama |
| Description | Training of government officials and response institutions in the post disaster needs assessment and recovery framework methodologies, including a simulation and drill exercise as the practical component of the course. The action leaves the officials trained with the exercise completed. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Panama |
| Recipient | Government officials and response institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Training and simulation exercise completed |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1984. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0039. |
Ejemplo 5 · Permanent line of work with no closing point
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation into development processes |
| Description as recorded | The global guideline for mainstreaming CCA and DRR into development planning, programming and budgeting will be used to develop country experiences in this topic. A regional workshop was held in June. |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1832) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Mainstreaming into development processes describes a permanent aspiration of the team. It never ends and it covers more than one output. The record must be narrowed to the technical assistance actually delivered in the period, with the institutions that received it. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 5. Techo de agregación |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation into development planning |
| Description | Application of the global mainstreaming guideline with the planning and budget institutions of the participating countries, with the documentation of the resulting country experiences. The action leaves the guideline applied and the experiences documented. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Planning and budget institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Global guideline applied with documented country experiences |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Environment Team |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1832. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0009. |
Ejemplo 6 · Two services in one record, stocktaking and dissemination
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Dissemination of UNDP urban risk strategy and guidelines, supported on UNDP LAC initiatives |
| Description as recorded | Stocktaking of urban disaster risk management initiatives in LAC and dissemination of global guidelines in this topic |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1830) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record contains a stocktaking exercise, which is knowledge production, and a dissemination effort, which is knowledge management and exchange. They are two service types and therefore two actions, linked to each other because the second uses the product of the first. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the stocktaking of urban disaster risk management initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean |
| Description | Identification and systematization of the urban disaster risk management initiatives under way in the region. The action leaves a completed stocktaking that serves as the basis for the dissemination action. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Country offices and urban risk institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Stocktaking of urban risk initiatives completed |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Dissemination of the UNDP urban risk strategy and guidelines in Latin America and the Caribbean |
| Description | Dissemination of the corporate urban risk strategy and of the associated guidelines among country offices and urban risk institutions, using the results of the regional stocktaking. The action leaves the guidelines transferred to the target audience. |
| Service type | Knowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Country offices and urban risk institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Global guidelines disseminated among the target institutions |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1830. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0048, que en el nuevo ciclo se carga como dos acciones. |
Ejemplo 7 · Systematization and proposal writing in one record
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Preparation of project proposals in urban risk management, early warning systems and resilience |
| Description as recorded | Systematization of DRR and recovery experiences in LAC and prepare project proposals in urban risk management, EWS, and resilience |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2368) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Systematizing experiences is knowledge management and formulating proposals is programme design. The two share an input but they have different recipients, different products and different closing points. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Systematization of disaster risk reduction and recovery experiences in Latin America and the Caribbean |
| Description | Systematization of the disaster risk reduction and recovery experiences accumulated in the region, organized so that they can be reused by country offices. The action leaves a completed systematization. |
| Service type | Knowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Country offices and regional practitioners |
| Result or deliverable | Systematization of regional experiences completed |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Formulation of project proposals on urban risk management, early warning systems and resilience |
| Description | Preparation of project proposals on urban risk management, early warning systems and resilience, developed with country offices and addressed to prospective donors. The action leaves the proposals prepared and submitted. |
| Service type | Programme design, formulation and scale-up (F09) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | Country offices and prospective donors |
| Result or deliverable | Project proposals prepared and submitted |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2368. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0053, que en el nuevo ciclo se carga como dos acciones. |
Ejemplo 8 · Adaptation of global guidelines to a national context
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Adaptation of disaster recovery needs assessment and management framework guidelines in El Salvador |
| Description as recorded | The PDNA and DRF global guidelines were adapted to country context in close collaboration with respective Government sectoral institutions |
| Rows in the base | 2 rows (IDs 1813 and 1976) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The same adaptation process was entered twice, once for El Salvador and once for Costa Rica, with equivalent recipients and an identical product. Here the recipient is of the same nature in both countries, sectoral government institutions, so rule 2 applies and the two records become one. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 con destinatario equivalente |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Adaptation of the post disaster needs assessment and recovery framework guidelines to the national context |
| Description | Adaptation of the global PDNA and DRF guidelines to the national context, carried out with the sectoral government institutions of each country. The action leaves the adapted guidelines adopted by the counterparts. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Costa Rica, El Salvador |
| Recipient | Sectoral government institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Adapted PDNA and DRF guidelines adopted by the counterpart |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1813 y 1976. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0006. |
Ejemplo 9 · Urban intervention recorded once per city
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support urban risk management intervention in Barbados |
| Description as recorded | Under the subregional programme for the Caribbean, in urban disaster risk management, the intervention in the capital city of Barbados is supported |
| Rows in the base | 3 rows (IDs 2135 to 2137) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Three cities of the same subregional programme produced three records. The programme is the container and the service is the same in all three cases. One action with the countries as scope and the programme as the parent project. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y regla 3 |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Support to the urban risk management interventions of the Caribbean subregional programme |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the urban risk management interventions in the capital cities covered by the subregional programme, including the local authorities responsible for each one. The action leaves the interventions implemented in the participating cities. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Dominica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| Recipient | Municipal authorities of the participating cities |
| Result or deliverable | Urban risk interventions implemented in the participating cities |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Urban Risk Global Initiative |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2135, 2136 y 2137. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0060. |
Ejemplo 10 · Technical assistance inside a third party project
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Recovery and nexus to development elements into humanitarian information systems in Central America |
| Description as recorded | Within the Swiss Development Agency project aimed at strengthening capacities in disaster response, having OCHA as implementing partner, UNDP is promoting the integration of recovery and development elements |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2144) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record starts from the project and not from the service. What UNDP contributed was technical assistance so that recovery and development criteria would be incorporated into the humanitarian information systems. The project moves to the parent project field. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 3. El proyecto es contenedor |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance for the integration of recovery and development elements into humanitarian information systems in Central America |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to OCHA and to the national response institutions for the incorporation of recovery and development criteria into the humanitarian information systems of the subregion. The action leaves the criteria integrated into the systems. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Central America |
| Recipient | OCHA and national response institutions in Central America |
| Result or deliverable | Recovery and development criteria integrated into the information systems |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Swiss Development Agency disaster response project |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2144. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0014. |
Ejemplo 11 · Case study well formulated
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Systematization of PDNA/DRF initiative in El Salvador |
| Description as recorded | This case study seeks to analyze and document the contributions of the PDNA and DRF to post-disaster recovery in El Salvador, including its ability to be adapted |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1826) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record identifies a single service, a verifiable product and an audience. It only needs a slight adjustment of the name so that it starts with an action noun. This is the standard the agent should propose. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Systematization of the post disaster needs assessment and recovery framework experience in El Salvador |
| Description | Case study that analyses and documents the contribution of the PDNA and the DRF to post disaster recovery in the country, including their capacity to be adapted to other contexts. The action leaves a published case study. |
| Service type | Knowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06) |
| Country, countries or region | El Salvador |
| Recipient | Recovery institutions and regional practitioners |
| Result or deliverable | Case study published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1826. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0049. |
Ejemplo 12 · Project formulation well formulated
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Formulation of Regional project in urban disaster risk reduction in Central America |
| Description as recorded | Multi-country urban disaster risk management proposal prepared with the collaboration of four country offices (Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras) |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1831) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record already satisfies the five attributes. One service type, a verifiable product, an identifiable recipient, a responsible team and a foreseeable closing point. It is kept almost unchanged and the four countries move into the scope attribute. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Formulation of the regional project on urban disaster risk reduction in Central America |
| Description | Preparation of the multi country project proposal on urban disaster risk management, developed with the four participating country offices. The action leaves a prepared proposal ready for submission. |
| Service type | Programme design, formulation and scale-up (F09) |
| Country, countries or region | Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras |
| Recipient | Participating country offices |
| Result or deliverable | Multi country project proposal prepared |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1831. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0055. |
6.7 HIV and Health
El equipo aportó 68 registros con 38 nombres distintos, lo que da 1,79 filas por acción. La duplicación por país es alta y se concentra en el trabajo de inclusión socioeconómica de poblaciones LGBTI en el Caribe, donde cada producto se registró una vez por cada uno de los cuatro países del programa. Aparecen además dos patrones que el agente debe aprender a corregir. El primero es el uso del año como prefijo del nombre. El segundo es el nombre administrativo tomado del instrumento de financiamiento, como country envelope, que no describe ningún servicio.
13 pares de ejemplo
Ejemplo 1 · Financing instrument used as the name of the action
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support country envelope implementation |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 5 rows, one per country (IDs 1847, 1849 to 1852) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Country envelope is the name of a funding instrument, not of a service. The record does not allow a reader to know what was implemented, with whom or with what result. The action must name the component that was executed and the funding instrument moves to the funding fields. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio y unidad de propósito |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Implementation of the country envelope components on HIV and key populations |
| Description | Execution of the components financed through the country envelopes with the national counterparts in each participating country, including the technical accompaniment of the implementing partners. The action leaves the components implemented with documented results. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Dominican Republic, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Paraguay |
| Recipient | National counterparts executing the components |
| Result or deliverable | Country envelope components implemented with documented results |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Global Fund country envelopes |
| Status | Closed |
| NOTA PARA EL AGENTE | |
| Cuando los componentes ejecutados en cada país sean sustantivamente distintos, corresponde una acción por componente y no por país. El criterio es el resultado, no el desembolso. | |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1847, 1849, 1850, 1851 y 1852. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0641. |
Ejemplo 2 · A single regional forum recorded four times
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support meaningful engagement of governments through national and regional policy dialogues – Private sector LGBTI inclusion best practices regional forum |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows (IDs 1790, 1791, 1792, 1794) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | One regional forum was recorded once per participating country. The name also mixes a permanent purpose, supporting meaningful engagement, with the concrete event that was delivered. The action is the forum and the purpose belongs in the description. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Convening of the regional forum on private sector best practices for LGBTI inclusion |
| Description | Convening and delivery of the regional forum that brought together governments, private sector representatives and LGBTI organizations to exchange inclusion practices. The action leaves the forum held with documented policy dialogue conclusions. |
| Service type | Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Jamaica |
| Recipient | Governments, private sector and LGBTI organizations |
| Result or deliverable | Regional forum held with policy dialogue conclusions |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1790, 1791, 1792 y 1794. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0638. |
Ejemplo 3 · Name that contradicts the scope it declares
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Small grants to LGBTI CSOs in 4 countries – Dominican Republic |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows (IDs 1797, 2582, 2583, 2584) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name announces four countries and then names only one, because the row was replicated per country and each copy kept a different country appended. The country must leave the name and move to the scope attribute. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y unidad de destinatario |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Transfer of small grants to LGBTI civil society organizations |
| Description | Selection of LGBTI civil society organizations and transfer of small grants for the execution of their inclusion initiatives, with technical accompaniment during the execution. The action leaves the grants transferred and executed by the selected organizations. |
| Service type | Programme implementation and oversight (F10) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica |
| Recipient | LGBTI civil society organizations |
| Result or deliverable | Grants transferred and executed by the selected organizations |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1797, 2582, 2583 y 2584. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0647. |
Ejemplo 4 · The year used as a prefix of the name
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | 2024 – Assessment of challenges that limit the participation of trans women in the workforce and develop a roadmap to address barriers |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows, one per country (IDs 2349, 2350, 2351, 2585) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The year is placed inside the name because there was no reliable period field. Under rule 6 the period is an attribute and the action keeps its identifier across periods. The record also joins an assessment with the roadmap that derives from it, which is acceptable because both belong to the same knowledge production service. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de tiempo. El período es un atributo |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the assessment of barriers to labour force participation of trans women and the corresponding roadmap |
| Description | Analysis of the barriers that limit the participation of trans women in the labour market in the participating countries and preparation of the roadmap to address them, delivered to the labour and social institutions. The action leaves the assessment and the roadmap delivered. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica |
| Recipient | Labour and social institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Assessment and roadmap delivered |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Gender |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2349, 2350, 2351 y 2585. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0620. |
Ejemplo 5 · Three sequential steps written as one long name
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Socioeconomic inclusion roadmap for LGBTI persons: mapping the decision-making process, identifying decision-making audiences, and developing of national plans for advocacy |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows, one per country (IDs 1858, 1859, 1860, 1890) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name lists the internal steps of the work rather than the service. Mapping and identifying audiences are stages of the same advisory process and do not become separate actions. What matters is that the name states the service and that the description keeps the stages as milestones. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Development of national socioeconomic inclusion roadmaps and advocacy plans for LGBTI people |
| Description | Advisory to national institutions and LGBTI organizations for the elaboration of the socioeconomic inclusion roadmap and of the national advocacy plans that derive from it. The mapping of decision making processes and audiences is a stage of this action. The action leaves the roadmap and the plans delivered. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica |
| Recipient | National institutions and LGBTI organizations |
| Result or deliverable | Roadmap and national advocacy plans delivered |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1858, 1859, 1860 y 1890. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0632. |
Ejemplo 6 · Placeholder left unresolved in the record
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Diagnostic on HIV sensitive social protection covering xxx (SP agencies in the country). How HIV people benefit from SP programs |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1857) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record kept the placeholder xxx where the institutions should be named. The formulario should not allow saving a record whose recipient is not identifiable. The agent must ask for the institution before proposing the final wording. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de destinatario |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the diagnostic on HIV sensitive social protection |
| Description | Analysis of the access of people living with HIV to the national social protection programmes, prepared with the social protection agencies of the country. The action leaves a delivered diagnostic with recommendations. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Paraguay |
| Recipient | National social protection agencies [name the institutions] |
| Result or deliverable | Diagnostic delivered on access of people living with HIV to social protection |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Inclusive Growth |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1857. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0623. |
Ejemplo 7 · Activity below the materiality threshold
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support pride activities |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1796) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Supporting an activity organized by others, with no substantive product of its own, does not meet the materiality threshold. It is recorded as a milestone within the larger advocacy action to which it belongs. It is only registered as an action when UNDP contributes a product of its own, such as a campaign or a study presented at the event. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Not recorded as an action. Registered as a milestone of the advocacy action on LGBTI rights of the period |
| Description | The support to pride activities is a means of execution. It is documented inside the description of the advocacy action that groups the visibility work of the period, stating the date and the contribution made. |
| Service type | Not applicable |
| Country, countries or region | Dominican Republic |
| Recipient | LGBTI organizations and communities |
| Result or deliverable | No deliverable of its own. It contributes to the deliverable of the parent advocacy action |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Not applicable |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1796. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0631, marcada como actividad puntual. |
Ejemplo 8 · Dissemination event with its own product
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Sub-regional webinar to share results of PEP Study |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1807) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | A webinar is normally a means of execution. It becomes an action when it is the dissemination vehicle of a substantive product, in this case the results of the post exposure prophylaxis study. The service type is advocacy and visibility, and it is a different action from the production of the study itself. |
| Regla o criterio | Caso límite. Evento con producto sustantivo |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of the subregional webinar presenting the results of the post exposure prophylaxis study |
| Description | Organization and delivery of the subregional webinar that presented the results of the post exposure prophylaxis study to health institutions and civil society. The action leaves the webinar held with the results disseminated to the target audience. |
| Service type | Advocacy, communications and visibility (F03) |
| Country, countries or region | The Caribbean |
| Recipient | Health institutions and civil society |
| Result or deliverable | Webinar held with study results disseminated |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1807. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0628. |
Ejemplo 9 · Review that mixes three products of the same service
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | 2024 – Review of social assistance programmes, survey of trans women to determine bottlenecks and develop a strategy to address the bottlenecks |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows, one per country (IDs 2356, 2357, 2358, 2586) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record joins a documentary review, a survey and a strategy. All three belong to the same knowledge production service and feed a single deliverable, so they remain one action. Rule 1 asks for one service type per action, not for one product per action. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 1 aplicada con criterio |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the review of social assistance programmes and of the bottlenecks faced by trans women |
| Description | Review of the social assistance programmes, survey of trans women to identify access bottlenecks and preparation of the strategy to address them, delivered to the social assistance institutions. The action leaves the review, the survey results and the strategy delivered as a single body of evidence. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica |
| Recipient | Social assistance institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Review, survey results and strategy delivered |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Inclusive Growth |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2356, 2357, 2358 y 2586. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0624. |
Ejemplo 10 · Regional convening well formulated
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Caribbean Judges Forum on HIV Huaman Right and the Law |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2049) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record identifies an event convened by UNDP with an identifiable audience. It only needs an action verb at the beginning of the name, a description and the correction of the typing error. This is a convening action, not a training one, because its purpose is dialogue among peers. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Convening of the Caribbean Judges Forum on HIV, human rights and the law |
| Description | Convening and delivery of the forum that brought together judges and justice institutions of the Caribbean to discuss the treatment of HIV in judicial practice. The action leaves the forum held with documented conclusions. |
| Service type | Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07) |
| Country, countries or region | The Caribbean |
| Recipient | Judges and justice institutions in the Caribbean |
| Result or deliverable | Forum held with documented conclusions |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Governance |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2049. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0637. |
Ejemplo 11 · Digital solution recorded as continued support
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Vaccine Equity: Continued support to Guyana CO on Digital solution |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 1809) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Continued support does not state a closing point. What the team did was to accompany the country office in putting a digital solution into operation with the health authorities. When the development of the tool and its deployment in a country are two distinct efforts, they are two actions. Here only the deployment corresponded to the team. |
| Regla o criterio | Caso límite. Desarrollo y despliegue de una herramienta digital |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Support to the Guyana country office for the deployment of the digital vaccine equity solution |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the country office and to the national health authorities for the deployment and entry into operation of the digital vaccine equity solution. The action leaves the solution operating with the health authorities. |
| Service type | Innovation and digital transformation (F08) |
| Country, countries or region | Guyana |
| Recipient | Country office and national health authorities |
| Result or deliverable | Digital solution operating with health authorities |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Vaccine Equity |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 1809. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0639. |
Ejemplo 12 · Index applied in two countries
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | LGBTI INCLUSION INDEX MEXICO |
| Description as recorded | Provide technical support to the CO Mexico to apply, develop and publish the LGBTI Inclusion index for the country. |
| Rows in the base | 2 rows (IDs 2891 and 2892) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name is written in capitals and includes the country. The two rows correspond to two national applications of the same index. The rule for indices is that the methodological development is one action and each national process is an action only when it involves differentiated accompaniment. Here both applications followed the same protocol, so they are one action with two countries in scope. |
| Regla o criterio | Caso límite. Índice que se implementa en varios países |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance to country offices for the application of the LGBTI Inclusion Index |
| Description | Technical support to the country offices and their national counterparts for the application, adaptation and publication of the LGBTI Inclusion Index. The action leaves the index applied and published for each country covered. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Costa Rica, Mexico |
| Recipient | Country offices and national counterparts |
| Result or deliverable | Index applied and published for the countries covered |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | LGBTI Inclusion Index |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2891 y 2892. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0627. |
Ejemplo 13 · National surveys recorded one per country
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | National LGBTI surveys |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows (IDs 1801, 1802, 1803, 1864) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | A single survey instrument applied in four countries generated four records. The instrument, the methodology and the team are the same. One action with the four countries in scope, and the national reports as the deliverable. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Implementation of the national LGBTI surveys |
| Description | Application of the national LGBTI survey in the participating countries, including the processing of the data and the publication of the national reports. The action leaves the survey data and the reports published for each country. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Barbados, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica |
| Recipient | National institutions and LGBTI organizations of the countries covered |
| Result or deliverable | Survey data and national reports published |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | HIV and Health |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 1801, 1802, 1803 y 1864. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0618. |
6.8 SDG Integration
El equipo aportó 52 registros al Dashboard 2.0, la cifra más baja de los ocho equipos, y sin embargo tiene el promedio más alto de filas por nombre de acción, 2,48. Dos patrones explican esa cifra. El primero es la repetición por país de productos regionales como los Integrated SDG Insights Reports. El segundo, y más importante para el agente, es el uso de un mismo nombre genérico, Support to COs to design implement and evaluate SDG Integration initiatives, para nueve servicios sustantivamente distintos, cuya única diferencia estaba escondida en el campo de descripción. Los ejemplos siguientes trabajan sobre esos dos patrones.
13 pares de ejemplo
Ejemplo 1 · Country duplication of a regional knowledge product
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Integrated SDG Insights Reports |
| Description as recorded | In preparation of the SDG Summit, support COs with a country analysis |
| Rows in the base | 13 rows, one per country office (IDs 2108 to 2119 and 2270) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | One single production process was recorded thirteen times because thirteen country offices received a country analysis. The country is describing the scope of the action, not its identity. The five attributes are met only once, so this is one action. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the Integrated SDG Insights Reports for country offices ahead of the SDG Summit |
| Description | Preparation of the country level SDG insight analyses requested by the country offices in the run up to the SDG Summit. The action leaves a delivered analytical report per participating country office. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Haiti, Panama, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Country offices preparing for the SDG Summit |
| Result or deliverable | Country level SDG insight analyses delivered to the thirteen country offices |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Integrated SDG Insights |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2108 to 2119 and 2270. Dashboard 3.0 action A-1494. |
Ejemplo 2 · One generic name hiding nine different services
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to COs to design, implement and evaluate SDG Integration initiatives |
| Description as recorded | Nine rows carry this same name. The distinguishing content sits in the description field, where it appears as SDG Push pilot Initiative, Support for the development of National Human Development Report, Programme based budgeting support, Support for the development of the country portfolio, Support on the project Anticipate and Prevent Governance of lithium, Support to review the Iniciativa 6145 Ley Orgánica de Planificación República de Guatemala, Development of a Potential Action Plan On UNDP support to Aruba, and two rows with no description at all. |
| Rows in the base | 9 rows (IDs 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 2120, 2121, 2123, 2124) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name does not describe a service, it describes a mandate. Nothing in it allows a reader to know what was delivered, to whom, or when it ended. Each row is in fact a different action, with a different recipient and a different deliverable. The name must carry the substance and the description must state what was left installed. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción, y unidad de propósito |
| PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance to country offices for the design and evaluation of SDG Push pilot initiatives |
| Description | Accompaniment to the country offices piloting SDG Push in the design of the pilot and in the assessment of its results. The action leaves a designed pilot and an assessment per participating office. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Peru |
| Recipient | Country offices piloting SDG Push |
| Result or deliverable | SDG Push pilots designed and assessed in the participating country offices |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | SDG Push Pilot Initiative |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance to country offices for the preparation of National Human Development Reports |
| Description | Substantive accompaniment and regional quality assurance to the country offices preparing their National Human Development Report. The action leaves a published report. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Chile |
| Recipient | Country offices preparing National Human Development Reports |
| Result or deliverable | National Human Development Report published with regional quality assurance |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| PROPOSED RECORD C · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance to the Guatemala country office for the review of the draft Organic Planning Law |
| Description | Technical review of Initiative 6145 on the Organic Planning Law, delivered to the country office and to the national planning institutions. The action leaves a written technical opinion. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Guatemala |
| Recipient | Country office and national planning institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Technical review of Initiative 6145 delivered |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Governance |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| NOTA PARA EL AGENTE | |
| Los seis servicios restantes que compartían este nombre se registran con la misma lógica, uno por destinatario y resultado. El agente debe reconocer que un nombre repetido con descripciones distintas es señal de que hay tantas acciones como descripciones. | |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 112, 113 y 2123. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-1506, A-1507 y A-1508. |
Ejemplo 3 · Country duplication of an analytical service
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Power of Data in LAC |
| Description as recorded | Power of Data |
| Rows in the base | 5 rows, one per country (IDs 2620, 2623 to 2626) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The description repeats the name and adds nothing. The five rows correspond to five country offices receiving the same analytical service. One action, with the countries as scope and a description that states what the analyses contain. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2. El país no divide la acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Production of the Power of Data analyses for country offices |
| Description | Preparation and delivery of the Power of Data analyses to the requesting country offices and their national counterparts, covering the use of new data sources for development decision making. The action leaves a delivered analysis per country. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Paraguay, Uruguay |
| Recipient | Country offices and national counterparts using the analyses |
| Result or deliverable | Data analyses delivered to the five country offices |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | Power of Data |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2620, 2623, 2624, 2625 y 2626. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1495. |
Ejemplo 4 · Telegraphic name with no verb and no result
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | SDGs – NDCs |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 4 rows, one per country (IDs 2750, 2886, 2887, 2888) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name is a pair of acronyms. It does not say what service was provided, who received it, or what was left installed. A reader outside the team cannot classify it. The action must be named with an action noun and completed with a recipient and a deliverable. |
| Regla o criterio | Umbral de materialidad y unidad de propósito |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance for the alignment of SDGs and Nationally Determined Contributions |
| Description | Support to planning and climate institutions for the analysis of the alignment between the national SDG framework and the Nationally Determined Contributions. The action leaves an alignment analysis adopted by the counterpart. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala |
| Recipient | Planning and climate institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Alignment analysis delivered and adopted by the counterparts |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Environment Team |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2750, 2886, 2887 y 2888. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1503. |
Ejemplo 5 · Concept recorded as an action
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Acceleration pathways |
| Description as recorded | Exploring next steps for acceptance pathways |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2748) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name is a concept and the description announces an exploration. Neither states a service or a closing point. If the work produced an approach that country offices can use, that is what should be recorded. If it did not, this is an internal reflection and it is not an action. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Development of the acceleration pathways approach for SDG integration |
| Description | Definition of the acceleration pathways approach and of the next steps agreed with the country offices and the national planning institutions that will apply it. The action leaves a defined approach with an agreed roadmap. |
| Service type | Strategic thinking and thought leadership (F01) |
| Country, countries or region | Aruba |
| Recipient | Country offices and national planning institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Acceleration pathways defined with next steps agreed |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2748. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1487. |
Ejemplo 6 · Tool named instead of the service delivered
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | SDG Rapid Assessment tools |
| Description as recorded | application of new integration tools |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2621) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record names an instrument. What the team did was to apply that instrument in a country office. The action is the application and its result is the completed assessment. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de propósito |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Application of the SDG rapid assessment tools |
| Description | Application of the rapid assessment tools with the participating country office to establish a baseline for SDG integration. The action leaves the completed assessment in the hands of the office. |
| Service type | Research, data and knowledge products (F02) |
| Country, countries or region | Curaçao |
| Recipient | Country offices applying the assessment tools |
| Result or deliverable | Rapid assessments completed |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2621. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1490. |
Ejemplo 7 · Two services in one record, development and launch
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Development and launch of SDG Integration Strategy for LAC |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 111) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Formulating a regional strategy and launching it publicly are two different service types, strategic thinking on one side and advocacy and visibility on the other. When the launch is a single event within the same process it can stay as a milestone. When it involves its own communication products and audiences it becomes a second action. This record is kept as one because the launch had no separate product, and the criterion is made explicit in the description. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Formulation and launch of the SDG Integration Strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean |
| Description | Formulation of the regional SDG Integration Strategy and its public launch. The launch is recorded as a milestone of this action because it did not generate communication products of its own. The action leaves an approved and publicly available strategy. |
| Service type | Strategic thinking and thought leadership (F01) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | UNDP LAC region |
| Result or deliverable | SDG Integration Strategy approved and publicly launched |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 111. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1488. |
Ejemplo 8 · Support to a person recorded without a deliverable
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Support to the Regional Director on UN and Global Summits |
| Description as recorded | Provide advise and technical support to the Regional Director on matters related to the Summit of the Future, G20, APEC, SIDS, COP, among others. |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2617) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Recurring advisory to a director could read as a permanent function. It qualifies as an action because it can be bounded by reporting period and because the technical inputs prepared for each summit process are identifiable products. The name is kept and the description is what makes the deliverable visible. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de propósito y unidad de tiempo |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Strategic advisory to the Regional Director for UN and global summits |
| Description | Preparation of technical inputs and strategic advice for the participation of the Regional Director in the Summit of the Future, the G20, APEC, the SIDS conference and the COP processes during the reporting period. The action leaves a set of delivered inputs per process. |
| Service type | Strategic thinking and thought leadership (F01) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | RBLAC Regional Director |
| Result or deliverable | Technical inputs delivered for the Summit of the Future, G20, APEC, SIDS and COP processes |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Ongoing |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2617. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1489. |
Ejemplo 9 · Partnership recorded as work with a partner
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Work with CAF on SDG Integration and Capacity Building around the 2030 Agenda |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 117) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | Working with a partner is not in itself a service. What was delivered here was a training programme built with CAF. The action is the training and the partner belongs in the fields of partner type and partner name. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de servicio |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of a capacity building programme with CAF on SDG integration and the 2030 Agenda |
| Description | Design and delivery of a training programme on SDG integration and the 2030 Agenda for CAF staff and country counterparts, developed jointly with CAF. The action leaves a completed programme with certified participants. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | CAF staff and country counterparts |
| Result or deliverable | Training programme delivered with certified participants |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | UNDP CAF partnership |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 117. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1511. |
Ejemplo 10 · Description that repeats the name
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Capacity Building on Administration and Public Policy |
| Description as recorded | Capacity Building on Administration and Public Policy |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2619) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The description repeats the name word for word. Forty two per cent of the base has no description at all and a repeated description is equivalent to an empty one. The description must state what was done and what was left installed, and it is where the recipient and the closing point become visible. |
| Regla o criterio | Campo de descripción obligatorio |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Delivery of capacity building on public administration and public policy |
| Description | Delivery of a capacity building programme for public officials on public administration and public policy, within the cooperation with the national government. The action leaves a completed programme with a trained group of officials. |
| Service type | Capacity development and training (F05) |
| Country, countries or region | Cuba |
| Recipient | Public officials |
| Result or deliverable | Capacity building delivered with trained participants |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2619. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1512. |
Ejemplo 11 · Pilot recorded twice for the same country
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Pilot of new integration tools |
| Description as recorded | Pilot of new integration tools in Aruba |
| Rows in the base | 2 rows (IDs 2618 and 2622) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The same pilot was entered twice with small differences in wording. Under rule 6 an action that continues across periods keeps its identifier and is updated through the status field, it is not entered again. The two rows become one action covering the two territories where the tools were piloted. |
| Regla o criterio | Regla 2 y regla 6. Continuidad entre períodos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Piloting of the new SDG integration tools |
| Description | Piloting of the new SDG integration tools with the participating country offices, including the documentation of the results of each pilot. The action leaves tested tools with a documented record of their performance. |
| Service type | Innovation and digital transformation (F08) |
| Country, countries or region | Aruba, Trinidad and Tobago |
| Recipient | Participating country offices |
| Result or deliverable | Tools piloted with documented results |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 IDs 2618 y 2622. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1514. |
Ejemplo 12 · Record with no recipient and no scope
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Provide support to update the National Development Strategy and the National Multi-Year Plan |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 2749) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The record does not say which country, which institution or what was delivered. Support is not a service type, it is a way of describing availability. The action must name the technical assistance provided, the planning institution that received it and the instrument that was produced. |
| Regla o criterio | Unidad de destinatario |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Technical assistance for the update of the National Development Strategy and the multi year plan |
| Description | Technical accompaniment to the national planning institutions in the update of the National Development Strategy and of the associated multi year plan. The action leaves both updated instruments delivered to the counterpart. |
| Service type | Policy advice and technical assistance (F04) |
| Country, countries or region | Dominican Republic |
| Recipient | Planning institutions |
| Result or deliverable | Updated national strategy and multi year plan delivered |
| Origin | Demand |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 2749. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1505. |
Ejemplo 13 · Record already well formulated
| CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0 | |
|---|---|
| Action name | Mapping and systematizing regional and global tools on SDG integration collection. |
| Description as recorded | Sin dato |
| Rows in the base | 1 row (ID 109) |
| DIAGNOSIS | |
| Qué falla | The name identifies a single service type, a verifiable product and an implicit recipient. It only needs a description and the completion of the mandatory fields. This is the level of formulation the agent should aim for. |
| Regla o criterio | Cumple los cinco atributos |
| PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0 | |
| Action | Mapping and systematization of regional and global SDG integration tools into a consolidated repository for country offices |
| Description | Identification and systematization of the regional and global tools available for SDG integration and their consolidation into a single repository accessible to country offices and regional teams. The action leaves an available repository. |
| Service type | Knowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06) |
| Country, countries or region | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) |
| Recipient | LAC country offices and regional teams |
| Result or deliverable | Repository of mapped SDG integration tools available to country offices |
| Origin | Supply |
| Lead team | SDG Integration |
| Focal point | [Team focal point] |
| Integrated work | Without integrated work |
| Parent project | No aplica |
| Status | Closed |
| Trazabilidad | Dashboard 2.0 ID 109. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1513. |
7. Observaciones sobre el formulario
Al construir las fichas aparecieron cuatro puntos que conviene resolver antes de abrir la carga del nuevo ciclo.
- La lista del campo Lead team tiene seis valores y los equipos que cargaron información en el ciclo anterior son ocho. Faltan SDG & Policy y SDG Integration, y el equipo de ambiente aparece en la base como LAC Environment Team. Conviene fijar la lista con los ocho nombres y usar el mismo texto en el campo Integrated work.
- El campo Period aparece en la definición de campos con el valor TBD. Sin ese campo resuelto, los equipos seguirán escribiendo el año dentro del nombre de la acción, como ocurre en varios registros del equipo de VIH y salud.
- El campo Recipient está definido como texto libre. Dado que es el atributo que sustituye a la duplicación por país, conviene acompañarlo de una lista sugerida de tipos de destinatario, por ejemplo oficina de país, institución nacional, gobierno subnacional, organización de la sociedad civil o audiencia regional, y dejar el texto libre para el nombre propio.
- El campo Funding type contiene dos entradas equivalentes, Cost Sharing y Cost sharing, que el sistema tratará como categorías distintas. Conviene unificarlas antes de abrir la carga.
8. Fuentes
- PNUD SIGOB. Definición de acción para el Dashboard Regional 3.0. Componente 1, Producto 1.
- Dashboard3.0. Acciones del Dashboard 2.0 reescritas según la definición de acción. Matriz de 1.958 registros y 1.514 acciones consolidadas.
- Campos BD Dashboard 3.0. Definición de campos, listas de valores y campos obligatorios.
- Consolidado de actividades del Dashboard 2022 a 2025, base de origen del Dashboard 2.0.