Saltar al contenido principal

RBLAC 3.0 Banco de Ejemplos

PNUD SIGOB · Componente 1. Evaluación y rediseño conceptual

Banco de ejemplos por equipo

Pares de registro actual y registro propuesto para el agente de redacción y clasificación de acciones del Dashboard Regional 3.0

Ciento cuatro pares construidos sobre los 1.958 registros del Dashboard 2.0, agrupados en los ocho equipos regionales. Cada par muestra el registro tal como está en la base, el diagnóstico de lo que falla y la ficha completa del registro propuesto con los campos obligatorios del Dashboard 3.0.

Programa Regional para América Latina y el Caribe 2026 a 2029

Contenido

1. Para qué sirve este banco

2. Cómo usar el banco al configurar el agente

3. Catálogo de tipos de servicio

4. Los ocho patrones que cubren los ejemplos

5. La ficha del registro propuesto

6. Banco de ejemplos por equipo

6.1 LAC Environment Team 14 ejemplos

6.2 Governance 13 ejemplos

6.3 Gender 13 ejemplos

6.4 SDG & Policy 13 ejemplos

6.5 Inclusive Growth 13 ejemplos

6.6 Disaster Risk Reduction 12 ejemplos

6.7 HIV and Health 13 ejemplos

6.8 SDG Integration 13 ejemplos

7. Observaciones sobre el formulario

8. Fuentes

1. Para qué sirve este banco

El Dashboard Regional 3.0 adopta una definición operativa de acción. Una acción es un servicio sustantivo prestado por un equipo regional que responde a un solo tipo de servicio del catálogo, se dirige a un destinatario identificable, genera un resultado o entregable verificable y se ejecuta bajo la responsabilidad de un equipo líder dentro de un período acotado del ciclo programático.

Esa definición se aprende con ejemplos y no con reglas abstractas. El agente de copiloto que acompañará a los equipos en la carga necesita ver, para cada equipo, cómo se ve un registro problemático de su propia base y cómo se ve el registro corregido. Ese es el contenido de este documento.

Todos los pares provienen de registros reales del Dashboard 2.0. El registro actual se transcribe tal como está en la base, con sus erratas y sus campos vacíos. El registro propuesto se construye aplicando la definición y las siete reglas de granularidad, y se presenta con los campos obligatorios del Dashboard 3.0 completos. Cada par cierra con la trazabilidad al identificador original, de modo que cualquier persona puede verificarlo en la matriz de reescritura.

Los ejemplos están en inglés porque en inglés está cargada la base y en inglés redactarán los equipos. El texto que los enmarca está en español.

2. Cómo usar el banco al configurar el agente

El banco está pensado para alimentar tres funciones del agente.

  • Redacción. Los registros propuestos son el estándar de redacción. El nombre empieza con un sustantivo de acción, contiene el servicio y el objeto, y no incluye el país, el año, el monto ni el nombre del proyecto. La descripción dice qué se hizo y qué quedó instalado, en dos o tres líneas.
  • Clasificación. Cada ficha asigna un solo tipo de servicio del catálogo F01 a F13 y explica en el diagnóstico por qué se eligió ese y no el vecino. Los casos de frontera entre F02 y F08, entre F06 y F07, y entre F09 y F11 están cubiertos de manera explícita.
  • Detección. Los diagnósticos enseñan al agente a reconocer los ocho patrones de error de la sección 4 antes de proponer una redacción, y a preguntar al usuario cuando falta el destinatario, el resultado o el período.

Una advertencia sobre el uso. El agente propone, el equipo decide. Varios ejemplos incluyen una nota que señala el punto en el que el criterio depende de información que solo el equipo tiene, como saber si un despliegue nacional supuso adaptación diferenciada. En esos casos el agente debe preguntar y no resolver por su cuenta.

3. Catálogo de tipos de servicio

El campo Service type admite un solo valor por acción. Los códigos F01 a F13 se usan en este documento como referencia corta y corresponden uno a uno con los valores del formulario.

CódigoValor del campo Service typeQué incluye
F01Strategic thinking and thought leadershipDefinición de agenda, narrativas, estrategias regionales, prospectiva y posicionamiento de temas.
F02Research, data and knowledge productsEstudios, informes, publicaciones, notas de política, encuestas, índices, tableros y sistemas de medición.
F03Advocacy, communications and visibilityCampañas, comunicación institucional, difusión y lanzamiento de productos, sensibilización.
F04Policy advice and technical assistanceAsesoría sustantiva y acompañamiento técnico a oficinas de país, gobiernos y socios.
F05Capacity development and trainingCursos, diplomados, talleres, academias y transferencia metodológica.
F06Knowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperationSistematización, comunidades de práctica, redes de conocimiento e intercambios entre pares.
F07Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnershipsForos y diálogos convocados por el PNUD, coordinación interagencial y gestión de alianzas.
F08Innovation and digital transformationPilotos, prototipado, escalamiento de innovaciones y productos digitales.
F09Programme design, formulation and scale-upNotas conceptuales, PRODOC, fases preparatorias y expansión programática.
F10Programme implementation and oversightEjecución y supervisión de proyectos regionales y de fondos verticales, incluidas transferencias.
F11Resource mobilization and development financeMovilización de recursos e instrumentos de financiamiento del desarrollo.
F12Monitoring, evaluation and learningSistemas de monitoreo, evaluaciones e informes de resultados.
F13Operational and institutional managementGestión interna del Hub y de recursos. Categoría residual.

4. Los ocho patrones que cubren los ejemplos

Los ejemplos de cada equipo están seleccionados para cubrir estos patrones con casos propios de ese equipo. La proporción de cada patrón varía según la base de cada uno, porque el equipo de ambiente carga desde PIMS y el de reducción de riesgos no tiene duplicación alguna.

PatrónCómo se reconoceRegla que lo resuelve
Duplicación por paísUna misma acción registrada una vez por cada país destinatario.Regla 2
Proyecto como unidadEl título de un proyecto o de un fondo cargado como si fuera la acción.Regla 3
Registro demasiado agregadoUn registro que mezcla dos o más tipos de servicio del catálogo.Regla 1
Función permanenteUna línea de trabajo que nunca concluye, con fórmulas como effective delivery u ongoing support.Regla 5
Actividad puntualUna reunión, un pago, una misión o una participación sin producto propio.Regla 4
Nombre sin servicioUn tema, un acrónimo, un título de publicación o el nombre de una herramienta, sin verbo de acción.Atributo de propósito
Destinatario ausenteUn registro que no permite saber a quién sirve la acción.Atributo de destinatario
Registro bien formuladoCumple los cinco atributos y solo requiere completar campos.Ninguna corrección

5. La ficha del registro propuesto

Cada registro propuesto se presenta con los campos de llenado obligatorio del Dashboard 3.0. La vinculación programática, es decir el outcome, el output y el indicador del Programa Regional 2026 a 2029, no se incluye en los ejemplos porque corresponde a los equipos determinarla en la carga. El campo Result or deliverable no es un campo del formulario, es la parte de la descripción que permite verificar que la acción tiene cierre, y se presenta separado para hacerlo visible.

Campo de la fichaQué debe contener
ActionEl servicio prestado, iniciando con un sustantivo de acción. Sin país, sin año, sin monto y sin el nombre del proyecto.
DescriptionDos o tres líneas sobre qué se hizo y qué quedó instalado, con los hitos relevantes del período.
Service typeUna sola categoría del catálogo F01 a F13.
Country, countries or regionSelección múltiple. Aquí es donde deja de duplicarse el registro por país.
RecipientLa institución, la oficina o el conjunto de actores a los que sirve la acción. No puede ser la región en abstracto.
Result or deliverableEl producto, resultado o cambio verificable que permite decir cuándo la acción concluyó.
OriginDemand cuando responde a una solicitud de una oficina de país. Supply cuando es oferta programada.
Lead teamUn solo equipo responde por el registro y su actualización.
Focal pointLa persona que responde por la acción. Es campo nuevo y no existía en el Dashboard 2.0.
Integrated workLos demás equipos contribuyentes. Si no hay, se marca Without integrated work.
Parent projectEl proyecto o programa en cuyo marco se presta el servicio, cuando corresponde.
StatusPlanned, Ongoing, Dropped o Closed. Es el campo que sostiene la continuidad entre períodos.

6. Banco de ejemplos por equipo

Cada capítulo abre con una nota sobre el patrón dominante del equipo en la base 2022 a 2025 y continúa con sus pares de ejemplos. El número entre paréntesis en cada título indica el patrón que ilustra el caso.

6.1 LAC Environment Team

El equipo concentra 700 de los 1.958 registros de la base, el 36 por ciento del total, con 637 nombres distintos. Ese volumen no refleja mayor intensidad de trabajo sino un mecanismo de captura distinto, porque la información se descarga de PIMS con lógica de proyecto. La regla 3 es la que resuelve esta situación. El proyecto deja de ser unidad de registro y se convierte en atributo, y lo que se registra son los servicios prestados en su marco, con una descomposición estándar por etapa del ciclo. Los ejemplos de este equipo son los más importantes del banco porque de ellos depende que la comparabilidad entre equipos sea posible.

14 pares de ejemplo

Ejemplo 1 · A PIMS project loaded as an action

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameStrengthening Management of the PA System to Better Conserve Endangered Species and their Habitats
Description as recordedStrengthening Management of the PA System to Better Conserve Endangered Species and their Habitats. The description repeats the project title.
Rows in the base1 row, PIMS 4956. There are 502 rows of this kind in the base.
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record is the title of a GEF project, downloaded from PIMS. A project is a container of financing, not a service. Under rule 3 it is decomposed by stage of the cycle, with one action for design and formulation, one for resource mobilization and one for implementation and oversight, all linked to the same project through the parent project field. In this case the period covered corresponds to the implementation stage.
Regla o criterioRegla 3. El proyecto es contenedor, no unidad
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionImplementation support and oversight of the protected areas management project
DescriptionTechnical supervision and project assurance of the protected areas management project during the reporting period, with the national implementing partner and the country office. The action leaves the assurance completed for the period, with the corresponding progress reports.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionMexico
RecipientNational implementing partner and country office
Result or deliverableProject assurance and technical supervision completed for the reporting period
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectStrengthening Management of the PA System to Better Conserve Endangered Species and their Habitats
StatusOngoing
NOTA PARA EL AGENTE
Cuando en el mismo período el equipo formuló el proyecto, movilizó recursos para él y supervisó su ejecución, corresponden tres acciones vinculadas al mismo proyecto, una por cada etapa. La descomposición estándar es la que hace comparable la información del equipo con la de los demás.
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 registro PIMS 4956. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1225.

Ejemplo 2 · The largest country duplication of the team

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameOversight of the Climate Promise in Argentina
Description as recordedProvide technical and strategic support to the Country Office for the implementation of the Climate Promise initiative
Rows in the base16 rows, one per country (IDs 2160 to 2174, 2893, 2894, 2898)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe oversight of one corporate initiative was recorded sixteen times, once per country office. The country is inside the name and the initiative is the container. One action for the reporting period, with the sixteen countries in scope and the initiative as the parent project.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y regla 3
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionOversight of the implementation of the Climate Promise
DescriptionTechnical and strategic support to the country offices and to the national climate authorities for the implementation of the Climate Promise during the reporting period. The action leaves the support delivered and the progress of each country documented.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Belize, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Panama, Paraguay, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay
RecipientCountry offices and national climate authorities
Result or deliverableTechnical and strategic support delivered for the reporting period
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectClimate Promise
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2160 a 2174, 2893, 2894 y 2898. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1315.

Ejemplo 3 · One oversight service replicated by project and country

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameHydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) Phase-out Management Plan
Description as recordedOversight of implementation
Rows in the base12 rows across ten countries (IDs 2700 to 2714)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name is the title of the plan and the description states the service in three words. Twelve rows correspond to the same oversight service delivered to the ozone authorities of ten countries under the same protocol. One oversight action per period, with the plans as parent project.
Regla o criterioRegla 3. Descomposición por etapa del ciclo
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionOversight of the implementation of the HCFC phase out management plans
DescriptionProject assurance and technical supervision of the HCFC phase out management plans with the national ozone authorities during the reporting period. The action leaves the assurance completed for the period in each participating country.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionBelize, Brazil, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guyana, Jamaica, Peru, Uruguay
RecipientNational ozone authorities
Result or deliverableProject assurance completed for the reporting period
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectMontreal Protocol, HCFC Phase-out Management Plan
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2700 a 2714. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1314.

Ejemplo 4 · A project phase written as the name of the action

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameExtension of institutional strengthening project (phase XV: 1/2024-12/2026)
Description as recordedOversight of implementation
Rows in the base7 rows across seven countries (IDs 2674, 2694, 2715 to 2718, 2720)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name carries the project phase and its dates. Both are attributes, the phase belongs to the parent project and the dates belong to the period field. An action that extends across periods keeps its identifier and is updated through the status field.
Regla o criterioRegla 6. Continuidad entre períodos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionOversight of the implementation of the institutional strengthening projects of the national ozone units
DescriptionProject assurance and technical supervision of the institutional strengthening projects of the national ozone units during the reporting period, within the corresponding phase of the programme. The action leaves the assurance completed for the period.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Haiti, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay
RecipientNational ozone units
Result or deliverableProject assurance completed for the reporting period
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectMontreal Protocol, institutional strengthening
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2674, 2694, 2715, 2716, 2717, 2718 y 2720. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1312.

Ejemplo 5 · Preparatory phase of vertical fund projects

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action namePreparatory Phase VF Projects
Description as recordedThe objective of the GEF PPG is to develop the project concept into a full project
Rows in the base9 rows across seven countries (IDs 657, 660 to 667)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record was replicated once per project in preparation. Under rule 3 the project is an attribute and the action is the formulation service delivered during the period. The description already states the deliverable, the full project document developed from the approved concept.
Regla o criterioRegla 3. La etapa de formulación es la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionPreparation of vertical fund project proposals during the preparatory grant phase
DescriptionDevelopment of the full project documents from the approved concepts, during the preparatory grant phase of the vertical fund projects of the participating countries. The action leaves the project documents developed and ready for submission.
Service typeProgramme design, formulation and scale-up (F09)
Country, countries or regionBrazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Honduras, Panama, Peru, Suriname
RecipientCountries preparing vertical fund projects and the corresponding country offices
Result or deliverableFull project documents developed from the approved concepts
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectGEF project preparation grant
StatusClosed
NOTA PARA EL AGENTE
En la base histórica esta acción quedó clasificada en movilización de recursos. Al reescribirla se observa que el servicio prestado es la formulación, de modo que corresponde F09. La movilización sería una acción distinta, la presentación de la propuesta al fondo.
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 657 y 660 a 667. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1342.

Ejemplo 6 · One proposal recorded once per country covered

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameStrategic Partnerships for Selva Maya: A Localized Framework for Inclusive and Sustainable Biodiversity Management to support the Global Biodiversity Framework
Description as recordedProject proposal developed and submitted to IKI in partnership with TNC
Rows in the base5 rows (IDs 2658, 2659, 2660, 2662, 2663)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaOne proposal covering several countries was entered once per country. There is a single formulation process, a single document and a single submission, so it is one action. The donor and the partner move to the corresponding fields.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 aplicada a una propuesta multipaís
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionFormulation of the Selva Maya biodiversity project proposal submitted to IKI
DescriptionPreparation of the project proposal on inclusive and sustainable biodiversity management in the Selva Maya, developed with The Nature Conservancy and submitted to the IKI donor. The action leaves the proposal formulated and submitted.
Service typeProgramme design, formulation and scale-up (F09)
Country, countries or regionBelize, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru
RecipientParticipating countries and the IKI donor
Result or deliverableProject proposal formulated and submitted
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectSelva Maya, IKI
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2658, 2659, 2660, 2662 y 2663. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0787.

Ejemplo 7 · Oversight of implementation used as the name

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameOversight of implementation
Description as recordedThe project aims to introduce low emission urban mobility concepts and energy efficiency management strategies among the municipalities of the San Salvador Metropolitan Area
Rows in the base1 row (ID 745). The same name appears in dozens of rows of the base.
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name states the service and omits the object. Dozens of rows share this identical name and cannot be told apart without opening the description. The name must contain the service and the object, and the description must state what the project is about.
Regla o criterioCampo de nombre. El servicio y el objeto
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionOversight of the implementation of the low emission urban mobility project in the San Salvador Metropolitan Area
DescriptionProject assurance and technical supervision during the reporting period of the project that introduces low emission urban mobility concepts and energy efficiency management strategies in the municipalities of the metropolitan area. The action leaves the assurance completed for the period.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionEl Salvador
RecipientMunicipalities of the San Salvador Metropolitan Area
Result or deliverableProject assurance completed for the reporting period
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectLow emission urban mobility, San Salvador Metropolitan Area
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 745. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1323.

Ejemplo 8 · Funding amounts written into the name

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameUpdate Paraguay GCF Funding Proposal: Promoting low-emission and climate-resilient practices in the soy and cattle ranching sectors (257 million USD of which 7 million for UNDP Technical Assistance)
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 645)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe amounts are inside the name. Financial figures belong to the funding fields, where they can be aggregated, and not to a text field that nobody can add up. The service is the update of a proposal submitted to a fund, which is resource mobilization.
Regla o criterioCampo de nombre. Las cifras son atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionUpdate of the GCF funding proposal for low emission practices in the soy and cattle sectors of Paraguay
DescriptionRevision and update of the funding proposal submitted to the Green Climate Fund for the promotion of low emission and climate resilient practices in the soy and cattle ranching sectors, prepared with the government. The action leaves the updated proposal submitted to the fund.
Service typeResource mobilization and development finance (F11)
Country, countries or regionParaguay
RecipientGovernment and the Green Climate Fund
Result or deliverableUpdated funding proposal submitted to the GCF
OriginDemand
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectGCF Paraguay soy and cattle proposal
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 645. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1348.

Ejemplo 9 · Logistical support recorded as an action

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to Gender focal points to attend south south dialogue in Costa Rica August 2023
Description as recordedPayment and support to attend the dialogue
Rows in the base4 rows, one per country (IDs 2723 to 2726)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaPaying for the travel of participants is a means of execution and not a substantive service. It does not meet the materiality threshold. It is recorded as a milestone inside the action that corresponds to the South South dialogue itself, which is the one that produces the exchange.
Regla o criterioRegla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionNot recorded as an action. Registered as a milestone of the South South dialogue on gender and environment
DescriptionThe logistical support that enabled the participation of the gender focal points is documented inside the description of the exchange action, stating the number of participating offices and the contribution made.
Service typeNot applicable
Country, countries or regionBrazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico
RecipientGender focal points of participating country offices
Result or deliverableNo deliverable of its own. It contributes to the deliverable of the South South exchange action
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGender
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusNot applicable
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2723, 2724, 2725 y 2726. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0776, marcada como medio de ejecución.

Ejemplo 10 · Knowledge product with a clear deliverable

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameDevelop a guide to identify appropriate Nature Based Solutions in Coastal Areas in the Caribbean to manage climate impact from coastal erosion and storm surge
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 648)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record identifies one service type, one product and one audience. It only needs an action noun at the beginning and a description that states who receives the guide and what it leaves installed.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDevelopment of the guide on nature based solutions for coastal areas in the Caribbean
DescriptionPreparation and publication of the guide to identify appropriate nature based solutions for the management of coastal erosion and storm surge in the Caribbean, addressed to coastal authorities and to tourism livelihood actors. The action leaves the guide published.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionThe Caribbean
RecipientCaribbean coastal authorities and tourism livelihood actors
Result or deliverableGuide published
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workDisaster Risk Reduction
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 648. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0733.

Ejemplo 11 · A generic training record

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameWorkshops and capacity building in different thematic areas in coordination with other institutions
Description as recordedIdentify recognized institutions to partnership and implement a capacity building programme to support the implementation of NDCs
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2198)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaDifferent thematic areas and other institutions are formulas that describe nothing. The description does state the actual purpose, a capacity building programme on NDC implementation delivered with partner institutions. The name must state that programme and the partners move to the partner fields.
Regla o criterioUnidad de propósito y unidad de destinatario
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of the capacity building programme on NDC implementation with partner institutions
DescriptionDesign and delivery of the capacity building programme on the implementation of Nationally Determined Contributions, developed with the partner institutions identified for that purpose and addressed to the climate authorities of the region. The action leaves the programme delivered with the partnerships established.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientClimate authorities of LAC countries
Result or deliverableCapacity building programme delivered with partner institutions
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectClimate Promise
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2198. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0764.

Ejemplo 12 · A peer exchange forum, not a convening

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameForum in the Caribbean sub-region focused on lessons learned during the revision and development of the NDCs
Description as recordedDevelop and convene a forum in the Caribbean sub-region focused on lessons learned during the revision and development of the NDCs, as well as sharing experiences on priorities
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2187)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe forum brings together peers of the same nature, the climate authorities of the subregion, to exchange lessons among themselves. That makes it knowledge exchange, F06, and not multi stakeholder convening, F07. The latter applies when different types of actors are brought together to reach an agreement.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio. Elección entre F06 y F07
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionConvening of the Caribbean forum on lessons learned in the revision and development of NDCs
DescriptionOrganization and delivery of the subregional forum where the climate authorities of the Caribbean exchanged lessons learned in the revision and development of their Nationally Determined Contributions and identified shared priorities. The action leaves the forum held with documented lessons and priorities.
Service typeKnowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06)
Country, countries or regionThe Caribbean
RecipientClimate authorities of Caribbean countries
Result or deliverableForum held with documented lessons and priorities
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectClimate Promise
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2187. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0770.

Ejemplo 13 · A digital tool updated for the region

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameUpdate of the NDCLAC web-based tool, including indicators from 27 countries in the region
Description as recordedCollaboration with GIZ, IDB, ECLAC and EUROCLIMA under the framework of the LEDSLAC platform to develop a web based tool for NDC tracking
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2178)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record sits between knowledge production and digital transformation. It is classified as a knowledge product because what is delivered is a tracking instrument with data, and not the development of a digital platform as such. When the effort is the construction of the platform, the service type is F08.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio. Elección entre F02 y F08
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionUpdate of the NDCLAC web tool with indicators from twenty seven countries
DescriptionUpdate of the web based tool for tracking Nationally Determined Contributions, incorporating the indicators of twenty seven countries of the region, developed within the LEDSLAC platform with the partner institutions. The action leaves the updated tool in operation.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientClimate authorities of the twenty seven countries covered
Result or deliverableUpdated NDC tracking tool in operation
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectLEDSLAC platform
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2178. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0757.

Ejemplo 14 · One inventory service across five countries

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action namePreparation of national inventory of banks of waste-controlled substances and development of a national plan for management of these substances
Description as recordedOversight of implementation
Rows in the base5 rows across five countries (IDs 2675, 2682, 2687, 2690, 2693)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name describes a formulation service and the description says oversight of implementation, which contradicts it. The agent must resolve the contradiction by asking what was actually delivered in the period. Here the deliverable is the inventory and the management plan, so the service is formulation.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y regla 3
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionFormulation of the national inventories of waste controlled substance banks and of the corresponding management plans
DescriptionPreparation of the national inventory of banks of waste controlled substances and of the national management plan for those substances, with the ozone authorities of each participating country. The action leaves the inventory and the plan formulated.
Service typeProgramme design, formulation and scale-up (F09)
Country, countries or regionCuba, Jamaica, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay
RecipientNational ozone authorities
Result or deliverableInventory and national management plan formulated
OriginSupply
Lead teamLAC Environment Team
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectMontreal Protocol
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2675, 2682, 2687, 2690 y 2693. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0793.

6.2 Governance

El equipo aportó 361 registros con 346 nombres distintos, 1,04 filas por acción, la base con menor duplicación después de reducción de riesgos. Su desafío no es el conteo sino la redacción. Aparecen tres patrones. El primero es el registro que mezcla asesoría de política con apoyo para acceder a financiamiento, que es el ejemplo canónico del documento de definición. El segundo es la función permanente redactada como acción, con fórmulas como effective delivery u ongoing assistance. El tercero es el nombre que contiene la descripción completa de una alianza o de un proyecto.

13 pares de ejemplo

Ejemplo 1 · Policy advice and resource mobilization in one record

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameProvide Policy advice to COs and support them to access Rule of Law Global Programme funding to support rule of law, access to justice, citizen security
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base2 rows (IDs 1658 and 2834)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record mixes two service types, policy advice and resource mobilization. It names no recipient beyond the country offices in the abstract and it states no result, so it has no possible closing point. It is split into two linked actions, each with its own deliverable.
Regla o criterioRegla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionPolicy advisory to country offices on rule of law, access to justice and citizen security
DescriptionSubstantive advice to the country offices working on rule of law, access to justice and citizen security, on the design and adjustment of their interventions. The action leaves country level recommendations agreed with each office.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientLAC country offices working on rule of law
Result or deliverablePolicy advice delivered with agreed country level recommendations
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSupport to country offices for accessing funding from the Rule of Law Global Programme
DescriptionAccompaniment to the country offices in the preparation and submission of their applications to the funding window of the Rule of Law Global Programme in the corresponding call. The action leaves the applications submitted and the outcome recorded in the status field.
Service typeResource mobilization and development finance (F11)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientLAC country offices applying for funding
Result or deliverableApplications submitted to the Global Programme funding window
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectRule of Law Global Programme
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1658 y 2834. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0369, que en el nuevo ciclo se carga como dos acciones.

Ejemplo 2 · A permanent function written as an action

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameEffective delivery of policy advice and programme support on elections
Description as recordedProvide comprehensive support on electoral assistance and its linkage with broader democratic governance strengthening to at least 50 per cent of the countries holding elections
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1660)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name describes what the team does permanently and never concludes. It fails the test of unity of purpose and the test of unity of time. The description does contain a measurable commitment, and that commitment is what makes the reformulation possible.
Regla o criterioRegla 5. Techo de agregación
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of electoral assistance and policy advice to country offices in countries holding elections
DescriptionElectoral assistance and policy advice delivered during the reporting period to the country offices of the countries holding elections, linked to the broader strengthening of democratic governance. The action leaves the assistance delivered to at least half of those countries.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientCountry offices in countries holding elections in the period
Result or deliverableElectoral assistance delivered to at least half of the countries holding elections
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
NOTA PARA EL AGENTE
Cuando la asesoría a un organismo electoral concreto supone trabajo sustantivo diferenciado, se registra como acción propia con su institución destinataria, y no dentro de esta acción agregada.
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1660. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0363.

Ejemplo 3 · Permanent availability recorded as a service

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameOngoing on-demand assistance in the areas of meaningful citizen participation and integrity of information ecosystems
Description as recordedProvide technical assistance in regards to the global and regional information integrity offers, with a focus on swift identification and transfer of good practices
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1671)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaOngoing on demand assistance describes a state of availability, not a delivered service. What is recorded is the assistance actually provided in each reporting period, with the offices that requested it and the practices that were transferred.
Regla o criterioUnidad de tiempo
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionOn demand technical assistance to country offices on citizen participation and information integrity
DescriptionTechnical assistance provided during the reporting period to the country offices that requested support on citizen participation and information integrity, including the transfer of good practices identified in the region. The action leaves the assistance delivered with the practices transferred.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientCountry offices requesting support on information integrity
Result or deliverableTechnical assistance delivered with good practices transferred
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1671. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0366.

Ejemplo 4 · The description of a partnership used as the name

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameConflict transformation and human rights. To comprehensively support NHRIs, UNDP, OHCHR and GANHRI formed the TriPartite Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions in 2011. The TPP increases efficiency and effectiveness of international support for NHRIs and leverages complementary mandates
Description as recordedThe central purpose of this proposal is to strengthen the capabilities of the Ombudsperson Office to monitor trends in conflict and resulting human rights violations
Rows in the base4 rows across four countries (IDs 2581, 2872, 2873, 2874)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name contains the full institutional description of the partnership. Nobody can read a dashboard built on names like this one. The description does state the actual service, the strengthening of an ombudsperson office. The partnership moves to the partner fields and to the parent project.
Regla o criterioCampo de nombre. Formulación como servicio prestado
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionStrengthening of the Ombudsperson Offices for conflict and human rights monitoring
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the ombudsperson offices of the participating countries to strengthen their capacity to monitor conflict trends and the human rights violations that derive from them, within the Tripartite Partnership. The action leaves the monitoring capacities strengthened.
Service typeMulti-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07)
Country, countries or regionBolivia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Peru
RecipientNational ombudsperson offices
Result or deliverableMonitoring capacities on conflict trends and human rights violations strengthened
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectTripartite Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2581, 2872, 2873 y 2874. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0450.

Ejemplo 5 · A digital system deployed in seven countries

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameImplementation of eMonitor+ (Bolivia)
Description as recordedImplementation of the eMonitor+ system, a digital media analysis tool based on artificial intelligence, to expand access to data on the dynamics of toxic communication
Rows in the base7 rows across seven countries (IDs 2549, 2550, 2551, 2554, 2986, 2987, 2988)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaSeven national deployments of the same system. This is the case where the team must decide. If each deployment required differentiated adaptation and accompaniment, each one is an action. If they followed the same protocol, rule 2 applies and there is one action. The recipients differ across countries, which suggests keeping the deployments that involved distinct institutional processes as separate actions.
Regla o criterioCaso límite. Despliegue con adaptación diferenciada
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionImplementation of the eMonitor+ media analysis system
DescriptionDeployment of the eMonitor+ system with the electoral and information integrity institutions of the participating countries, including the configuration of the analysis models. The action leaves the system in operation producing data on toxic communication and disinformation.
Service typeInnovation and digital transformation (F08)
Country, countries or regionBolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru
RecipientElectoral and information integrity institutions
Result or deliverableSystem in operation producing data on toxic communication and disinformation
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projecteMonitor+
StatusOngoing
NOTA PARA EL AGENTE
Si en la carga del nuevo ciclo un despliegue nacional supone un proceso institucional propio, con su propio destinatario y su propio cierre, se registra como acción independiente y no dentro de esta.
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2549, 2550, 2551, 2554, 2986, 2987 y 2988. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0573.

Ejemplo 6 · Same service to different institutions stays separate

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameResults-based management system for institutional priorities at Gobernación del Chaco (Argentina), and Results-based management for institutional priorities at the Fiscalía General de la Nación (Colombia)
Description as recordedMETAS, in both records
Rows in the base2 rows (IDs 1675 and 1676)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThese two records are the same product deployed in two institutions. They are not merged, because the recipient and the result are different in each case. The rule that removes the country from the identity of the action does not apply when the institutional process is specific to each recipient.
Regla o criterioCriterio de no unificación dentro de un mismo país
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDeployment of the results based management system for institutional priorities at the Gobernación del Chaco
DescriptionInstallation and start up of the METAS results based management system for the institutional priorities of the provincial government, including the training of the management team. The action leaves the system in operation.
Service typeInnovation and digital transformation (F08)
Country, countries or regionArgentina
RecipientGobernación del Chaco
Result or deliverableMETAS system in operation with institutional priorities under management
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectPNUD SIGOB, product METAS
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDeployment of the results based management system for institutional priorities at the Fiscalía General de la Nación
DescriptionInstallation and start up of the METAS results based management system for the institutional priorities of the prosecution service, including the training of the management team. The action leaves the system in operation.
Service typeInnovation and digital transformation (F08)
Country, countries or regionColombia
RecipientFiscalía General de la Nación
Result or deliverableMETAS system in operation with institutional priorities under management
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectPNUD SIGOB, product METAS
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1675 y 1676. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-0516 y A-0515.

Ejemplo 7 · Municipal support recorded once per municipality

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameStrengthening of management capacities at the Municipalidad de Ahuachapán (El Salvador)
Description as recordedSIGOBito ongoing support
Rows in the base4 rows across three countries (IDs 1710, 1711, 1712, 2222)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaFour municipal deployments of the same product were grouped as one action because the service and the result are equivalent. The description ongoing support is the problem, since it announces no closing point. Each deployment concludes when the municipal team is trained and using the system.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 aplicada con cautela
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionStrengthening of municipal management capacities through the SIGOBito system
DescriptionInstallation of the SIGOBito management system in the participating municipalities and training of their management teams in its use. The action leaves each municipal team trained and using the system.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Dominican Republic, El Salvador
RecipientParticipating municipal governments
Result or deliverableMunicipal teams trained and using the management system
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectPNUD SIGOB, product SIGOBito
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1710, 1711, 1712 y 2222. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0424.

Ejemplo 8 · Evidence production recorded once per country

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameInformation on violence against the LGBTQ+ population (Belize)
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base6 rows across four countries (IDs 1776 to 1781)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name is a noun phrase with the country appended and no verb. The four national measurements replicate one action. The record must state that what was produced is evidence, and for whom.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of evidence on violence against LGBTQ people
DescriptionCollection and analysis of data on violence against LGBTQ people in the participating countries, delivered to the institutions and civil society organizations that work on the issue. The action leaves the data and the analysis delivered.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionBelize, Guatemala, Honduras, Panama
RecipientNational institutions and civil society organizations
Result or deliverableData and analysis on violence against LGBTQ people delivered
OriginSupply
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workHIV and Health
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1776 a 1781. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0312.

Ejemplo 9 · Technical assistance under a regional programme

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameTechnical Assistance for the production of systematic analyses of citizen security and violence against women and girls (INFOSEGURA)
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base4 rows, one per country (IDs 1927, 1928, 1969, 1970)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaFour records for the same technical assistance service delivered under one regional programme. The programme goes to the parent project field and the countries to the scope attribute.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y regla 3
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance for the production of systematic analyses on citizen security and violence against women and girls
DescriptionAccompaniment to the national statistical and security institutions in the production of systematic analyses on citizen security and on violence against women and girls, strengthening their analytical capacity. The action leaves the analyses produced with the counterparts.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionBelize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras
RecipientNational statistical and security institutions
Result or deliverableAnalytical capacities strengthened and analyses produced with the counterparts
OriginDemand
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGender
Parent projectINFOSEGURA
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1927, 1928, 1969 y 1970. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0389.

Ejemplo 10 · Project formulation and launch

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameFinalize and launch the new Regional Project on Access to Justice and Criminal Justice with EU
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1663)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaFormulating and signing a project is programme design, F09. The subsequent implementation of that same project is a different action under F10. Rule 3 asks precisely for this decomposition by stage of the cycle, so that the project never appears as an action.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio. Formulación frente a implementación
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionFormulation and launch of the regional project on access to justice and criminal justice with the European Union
DescriptionPreparation of the project document, negotiation with the donor and public launch of the regional project on access to justice and criminal justice. The action leaves the project document signed and the project launched. Its implementation is recorded as a separate action.
Service typeProgramme design, formulation and scale-up (F09)
Country, countries or regionThe Caribbean
RecipientJustice institutions of the participating countries
Result or deliverableProject document signed and project launched
OriginSupply
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectRegional project on access to justice and criminal justice, EU funded
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1663. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0598.

Ejemplo 11 · A forum convened by UNDP

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameInternational Forum on Innovative Solutions to Strengthen Citizen Security and Access to Justice (INFOSEGURA)
Description as recordedThe Forum opened spaces to exchange information and best practices for enhancing citizen security and access to justice in Central America
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1965)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaA forum convened by UNDP is an action, unlike attendance at a forum convened by a third party. The record only needs an action noun at the beginning and the identification of the audience.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionConvening of the International Forum on innovative solutions for citizen security and access to justice
DescriptionConvening and delivery of the international forum that brought together institutions of Central America and the Dominican Republic to exchange practices on citizen security and access to justice. The action leaves the forum held with a documented exchange of practices.
Service typeMulti-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07)
Country, countries or regionCentral America
RecipientSecurity and justice institutions of Central America and the Dominican Republic
Result or deliverableForum held with documented exchange of practices
OriginSupply
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectINFOSEGURA
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1965. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0443.

Ejemplo 12 · A regional narrative and its working procedures

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameBuild an RBLAC narrative on information integrity, including an agenda and working procedures to support COs
Description as recordedThe narrative follows the five pillar information integrity offer developed by the corporate teams
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1659)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaDefining a regional narrative with its agenda and its working procedures is strategic positioning, F01. The record is well bounded because the narrative is adopted at a given moment. It only needs an action noun at the beginning of the name.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDevelopment of the RBLAC narrative and working procedures on information integrity
DescriptionDefinition of the regional narrative on information integrity, of its agenda and of the working procedures that guide the support to country offices, following the five pillar corporate offer. The action leaves the narrative and the procedures adopted.
Service typeStrategic thinking and thought leadership (F01)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientLAC country offices and RBLAC teams
Result or deliverableNarrative, agenda and working procedures adopted
OriginSupply
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1659. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0293.

Ejemplo 13 · A joint report with an external partner

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameResearch and data collection of socio-economic indicators of migrant integration in host communities and social cohesion
Description as recordedJoint report with OECD which contains an overview of the integration of migrant and refugee populations in Latin America and the Caribbean
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1669)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name describes the internal process, research and data collection, and not the product. The description reveals that the deliverable is a joint report. The name must state the product and the partner belongs in the partner fields.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the joint report with OECD on the socioeconomic integration of migrants in host communities
DescriptionPreparation and publication of the joint report with OECD on the integration of migrant and refugee populations in the region, with quantitative and policy analysis. The action leaves the report published.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientMigration authorities and regional policy audience
Result or deliverableJoint report published with quantitative and policy analysis
OriginSupply
Lead teamGovernance
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectUNDP and OECD partnership
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1669. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0322.

6.3 Gender

El equipo aportó 321 registros con 261 nombres distintos, 1,23 filas por acción. Su duplicación se concentra en los sellos de igualdad de género, tanto el corporativo como los nacionales, donde cada institución certificada o cada oficina de país generó una fila. Aparecen además dos patrones que el agente debe corregir. El primero es el registro de eventos, webinarios y participaciones en conferencias como si fueran acciones. El segundo es la duplicación por diferencias de escritura del mismo nombre, que el agente debe detectar antes de crear un registro nuevo.

13 pares de ejemplo

Ejemplo 1 · A certification programme recorded once per institution

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameImplementation of the Gender Equality Seal for public institutions in Chile
Description as recordedGender Equality Seal for Public Institutions is a global initiative of UNDP to strengthen effective governance with a gender perspective
Rows in the base15 rows across fourteen countries (IDs 501 to 508, 1985 to 1988, 2611, 2876, 2879)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe country is inside the name and each national implementation produced its own row. The service, the certification protocol and the team are the same in all of them, so it is one action with the countries in scope. Where a specific institution required a differentiated adaptation, such as the case of public financial institutions in Panama, that adaptation is a separate action.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y criterio de destinatario
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionImplementation of the Gender Equality Seal for public institutions
DescriptionAccompaniment of the public institutions of the participating countries through the certification cycle of the Gender Equality Seal, from the self assessment to the certification. The action leaves the participating institutions certified.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru
RecipientPublic institutions in the certification cycle
Result or deliverableParticipating institutions certified under the Seal
OriginDemand
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGovernance
Parent projectGender Equality Seal for Public Institutions
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 501 a 508, 1985 a 1988, 2611, 2876 y 2879. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0270.

Ejemplo 2 · Corporate certification cycle recorded per country office

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to COs to implement the UNDP Gender Equality Seal 2021-2023
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base13 rows, one per country office (IDs 599 to 611)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThirteen records for the same corporate certification cycle. The period is inside the name, where it does not belong, because the period is an attribute. One action with the twelve offices in scope and the period in its own field.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSupport to country offices for the implementation of the UNDP Gender Equality Seal
DescriptionAccompaniment to the country offices during the corporate certification cycle of the Gender Equality Seal, including the self assessment, the action plan and the preparation of evidence. The action leaves the participating offices certified.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionBolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Jamaica, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay
RecipientLAC country offices in the certification cycle
Result or deliverableCountry offices certified in the corporate Seal cycle
OriginDemand
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectUNDP Gender Equality Seal
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 599 a 611. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0275.

Ejemplo 3 · Duplication caused by a spelling difference

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameMeasurement of Gender Social Norms
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base11 rows across ten countries (IDs 474 to 483 and 2878)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaBeyond the duplication by country, two of these rows are the same measurement entered twice with a small difference in the wording of the name. The agent must search for an equivalent action before creating a new one, and propose the update of the existing record instead of a new entry.
Regla o criterioDetección de duplicados antes de crear el registro
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionMeasurement of gender social norms in the participating countries
DescriptionApplication of the gender social norms measurement in the countries of the sample, with the processing of the data and the publication of the results. The action leaves the measurement produced and the results published.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Haiti, Mexico, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay
RecipientNational institutions of the countries covered and regional policy audience
Result or deliverableGender social norms measurement produced and results published
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 474 a 483 y 2878. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0083.

Ejemplo 4 · Strategic advisory to offices recorded ten times

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameStrategic advice to develop the Gender Equality Strategy in Country Office
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base10 rows across nine countries (IDs 2035 to 2042, 2518, 2519)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaContinuous advisory to country offices on the same theme is recorded as one action per reporting period and per theme, with the status updated, and not once per exchange or once per office. Two of these rows are also duplicates caused by differences in wording.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y caso límite de asesoría continua
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionStrategic advisory to country offices for the development of their gender equality strategies
DescriptionAccompaniment to the country offices in the formulation of their gender equality strategy, from the diagnostic to the approval of the document. The action leaves an approved strategy per participating office.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionBolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela
RecipientCountry offices developing their gender equality strategies
Result or deliverableCountry office gender equality strategy approved
OriginDemand
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2035 a 2042, 2518 y 2519. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0146.

Ejemplo 5 · The number of countries written into the name

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameImplementation of National Seals / National Gender Programs for the Private Sector in 7 countries
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base7 rows, one per country (IDs 519 to 525)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name announces seven countries and the record was still entered seven times. The count of countries does not belong in the name either, because it changes as the programme grows and the dashboard obtains it from the scope attribute.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionImplementation of the national gender seals for the private sector
DescriptionAccompaniment of the national gender seal programmes for private companies in the participating countries, from the design of the national scheme to the certification of the first cohort of companies. The action leaves the national seals operating with certified companies.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionCosta Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Panama, Paraguay, Peru
RecipientPrivate companies and national certifying institutions
Result or deliverableNational seals operating with certified companies
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workInclusive Growth
Parent projectGender Equality Seal for the Private Sector
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 519 a 525. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0269.

Ejemplo 6 · A digital tool deployed in several countries

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport the implementation of the care services georeferencing tool in Lima Metropolitana
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base6 rows across six countries (IDs 533, 2278, 2279, 2280, 2563, 2564)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaSix national deployments of the same tool were recorded separately. The criterion is that the development of the tool is one action and each deployment is an action only when it requires differentiated adaptation and accompaniment. Since these deployments followed the same protocol, they become one action with the countries in scope.
Regla o criterioCaso límite. Desarrollo y despliegue de una herramienta
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionImplementation of the care services georeferencing tool
DescriptionDeployment of the care services georeferencing tool with the responsible authorities of each participating territory, including the loading of the local care supply. The action leaves the tool in operation with the care services mapped.
Service typeInnovation and digital transformation (F08)
Country, countries or regionColombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru
RecipientCare system authorities of the participating territories
Result or deliverableGeoreferencing tool in operation with mapped care services
OriginDemand
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 533, 2278, 2279, 2280, 2563 y 2564. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0258.

Ejemplo 7 · A training programme with several national cohorts

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameTraining project on care, gender and rights in cooperation with FLACSO-PRIGEPP and the Open Society Foundation
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base5 rows, one per country (IDs 574, 1895 to 1898)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaOne training programme with participants from five countries generated five records. The rule for training is one action per programme and period, with the cohorts and the countries as attributes. The partners move to the partner fields.
Regla o criterioCaso límite. Cohortes en un mismo período
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of the training programme on care, gender and rights
DescriptionDelivery of the training programme on care, gender and rights for public officials and civil society, developed with FLACSO PRIGEPP and the Open Society Foundation. The action leaves the programme completed with certified participants from the countries covered.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico
RecipientPublic officials and civil society organizations
Result or deliverableTraining programme completed with certified participants
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 574, 1895, 1896, 1897 y 1898. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0206.

Ejemplo 8 · Two webinars recorded as two actions

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameOrganization of a webinar in the framework of the Time Week in LAC in collaboration with BTUI, and Webinar to promote inclusion in Central Banks
Description as recordedSin dato en ambos registros
Rows in the base2 rows (IDs 573 and 582)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaA webinar on its own is a means of execution. These two qualify as actions because each disseminated substantive content to an identified audience and left documented conclusions. When several webinars form a single series with one purpose, they are recorded as one action with the sessions as milestones.
Regla o criterioRegla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of the webinar on time use within Time Week in Latin America and the Caribbean
DescriptionOrganization and delivery of the webinar on time use held within Time Week, in collaboration with BTUI, addressed to statistical offices and care policy institutions. The action leaves the webinar held with documented conclusions.
Service typeAdvocacy, communications and visibility (F03)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientStatistical offices and care policy institutions
Result or deliverableWebinar held with documented conclusions
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of the webinar on gender inclusion in central banks
DescriptionOrganization and delivery of the webinar addressed to central banks of the region on gender inclusion in their institutional practices. The action leaves the webinar held with the participating institutions engaged.
Service typeAdvocacy, communications and visibility (F03)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientCentral banks of the region
Result or deliverableWebinar held with participating institutions
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workInclusive Growth
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 573 y 582. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-0124 y A-0123.

Ejemplo 9 · Participation in an intergovernmental process

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport UNDP participation in the CSW 66, this year will focus on climate change. This includes support in the design and implementation of the high-level event and thematic events
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 489)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaAttending an intergovernmental session is not an action. Designing and delivering the events that UNDP contributed to it is. The record is reformulated around that substantive contribution, which is what has a deliverable and a closing point.
Regla o criterioCaso límite. Foros de terceros
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSubstantive contribution of UNDP to the high level and thematic events of CSW 66 on climate change
DescriptionDesign and delivery of the high level event and of the thematic events contributed by UNDP to the sixty sixth session of the Commission on the Status of Women, devoted to climate change. The action leaves the events delivered with UNDP substantive inputs.
Service typeMulti-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientMember States and partners participating in CSW 66
Result or deliverableHigh level and thematic events designed and delivered with UNDP inputs
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workEnvironment Team
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 489. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0249.

Ejemplo 10 · Validation of studies and their regional dissemination

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameValidation and final approval of the 8 multidimensional studies on femicide and socialization of results, findings and recommendations in at least 3 regional spaces
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 470)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record joins the production and validation of eight studies, which is knowledge production, with their dissemination in regional spaces, which is advocacy and visibility. They are two service types and therefore two linked actions.
Regla o criterioRegla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionValidation and publication of the eight multidimensional studies on femicide
DescriptionTechnical validation with the justice sector institutions and publication of the eight multidimensional studies on femicide. The action leaves the eight studies validated and published.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientJustice sector institutions in Latin America
Result or deliverableEight studies validated and published
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGovernance
Parent projectSpotlight Initiative Latin America Regional Programme
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDissemination of the findings of the studies on femicide in regional spaces
DescriptionPresentation of the results, findings and recommendations of the eight studies in at least three regional spaces, with the corresponding dissemination materials. The action leaves the findings socialized with the target audiences.
Service typeAdvocacy, communications and visibility (F03)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientJustice sector institutions and regional audience
Result or deliverableFindings presented in at least three regional spaces
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGovernance
Parent projectSpotlight Initiative Latin America Regional Programme
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 470. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0115, que en el nuevo ciclo se carga como dos acciones.

Ejemplo 11 · A course cohort well formulated

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameImplementation of the 4rd cohort of the virtual course Keys to gender equality
Description as recordedThis online course for civil servants aims to contribute to the reflection on what it means to integrate the gender perspective
Rows in the base1 row (ID 500)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record identifies one service type, one audience, one cohort and one closing point. The only correction needed is the typing error in the cohort number and the addition of the deliverable in the description. Each cohort is a distinct action because each has its own period and its own participants.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of the fourth cohort of the virtual course Keys to gender equality for public servants
DescriptionDelivery of the fourth cohort of the virtual course addressed to public servants on the integration of the gender perspective into institutional practice. The action leaves the cohort completed with certified participants.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientPublic servants
Result or deliverableFourth cohort completed with certified participants
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 500. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0197.

Ejemplo 12 · A community of practice, not a meeting

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameCommunity of practice of public institutions implementing Gender Seal
Description as recordedMeeting place for public institutions to exchange learning and experiences on gender equality policies
Rows in the base1 row (ID 513)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaA community of practice is knowledge management and peer exchange, F06, and not multi stakeholder convening, F07. The distinction is that its participants are peers who exchange learning on a sustained basis, and not actors convened for a dialogue with a defined outcome.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio. Elección entre F06 y F07
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionCoordination of the community of practice of public institutions implementing the Gender Equality Seal
DescriptionCoordination and animation of the community of practice that brings together the certified institutions and those in the certification process, for the exchange of learning on gender equality policies. The action leaves the community in operation with documented exchanges.
Service typeKnowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientPublic institutions certified or in certification
Result or deliverableCommunity of practice in operation with documented exchanges
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectGender Equality Seal for Public Institutions
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 513. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0228.

Ejemplo 13 · Communication strategy with its own products

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameCommunication strategy and data visualization to position GES results with LAC institutions
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 510)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThis is the case in which communication does become an action of its own, because it has its own products, its own audience and its own closing point. It is separate from the implementation of the Seal, which is a different action under F10.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio. Comunicación como acción propia
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of the communication strategy and data visualization to position the results of the Gender Equality Seal
DescriptionDesign and execution of the communication strategy and of the data visualization products that present the results of the Gender Equality Seal to public and private institutions of the region. The action leaves the strategy executed with the visualization products published.
Service typeAdvocacy, communications and visibility (F03)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientPublic and private institutions of the region
Result or deliverableCommunication strategy executed with data visualization products
OriginSupply
Lead teamGender
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectGender Equality Seal for Public Institutions
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 510. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0119.

6.4 SDG & Policy

El equipo aportó 200 registros con 138 nombres distintos. Su volumen se concentra en la producción de conocimiento, y en particular en dos series editoriales, Policy Documents y Working Papers, más las encuestas regionales. Su distorsión principal es la encuesta de hogares de alta frecuencia, que aparece 25 veces, la mayor duplicación de toda la base. El segundo patrón es el título de publicación cargado tal cual, sin verbo y sin resultado, y con los países que cubre incrustados en el título.

13 pares de ejemplo

Ejemplo 1 · The most duplicated record in the whole base

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameHigh-frequency household surveys
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base25 rows, one per country (IDs 235 and 240 to 263)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaOne survey operation with a single methodology and a single team was recorded twenty five times, once per country covered. This is the single most severe distortion in the base and it is corrected entirely by rule 2. The name also lacks a verb and the record lacks any statement of what is delivered.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionImplementation of the high frequency household surveys to monitor socioeconomic conditions in the region
DescriptionDesign, fielding and processing of the high frequency household survey rounds in the countries covered, with the release of the microdata and of the analytical reports. The action leaves the microdata and the reports available for each round.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionAntigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Lucia, Uruguay
RecipientCountries covered by the survey rounds and regional policy audience
Result or deliverableSurvey microdata and analytical reports released
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 235 y 240 a 263. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1355.

Ejemplo 2 · A study series recorded once per country studied

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSocial Protection Systems studies, using methodological approach put forth by the RHDR 2021
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base12 rows, one per country (IDs 279 to 290)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaOne methodology applied to twelve national studies produced twelve records. The methodological approach and the team are the same, so this is one action with the twelve countries in scope and the published studies as the deliverable.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the national social protection system studies applying the RHDR 2021 methodology
DescriptionPreparation of the national social protection system studies using the methodological approach of the Regional Human Development Report 2021, in the countries covered by the series. The action leaves the national studies published.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru
RecipientSocial protection institutions of the countries covered and regional policy audience
Result or deliverableNational social protection system studies published
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workInclusive Growth
Parent projectRegional Human Development Report 2021 follow up
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 279 a 290. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1358.

Ejemplo 3 · A regional survey with a title instead of a name

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameA better world for migrants: Perceptions around migration
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base10 rows, one per country (IDs 264 to 273)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record uses the title of the publication as the name of the action, and it was replicated once per country covered. The action is the production of the survey and the title belongs inside the name as the identifier of the product, preceded by an action noun.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y unidad de propósito
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the regional perception survey on migration A better world for migrants
DescriptionDesign, fielding and analysis of the regional perception survey on migration, covering the countries of the sample, and publication of the resulting report. The action leaves a published survey report.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago
RecipientMigration authorities of the countries covered and regional policy audience
Result or deliverablePublished perception survey report on migration
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGovernance
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 264 a 273. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1360.

Ejemplo 4 · A service named after the tool it uses

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameMonitoring service with Twitter
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base6 rows (IDs 216 to 221)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name identifies a data source and not a service. What the team produced was a monitoring service on social media data for regional development analysis, with periodic reports. The tool moves into the description.
Regla o criterioUnidad de propósito
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the social media monitoring service for regional development analysis
DescriptionOperation of the monitoring service based on social media data, with the delivery of periodic reports to the regional teams and country offices that use them. The action leaves the periodic reports delivered for each round.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionChile, Colombia, Mexico, Panama, Venezuela
RecipientUNDP regional teams and country offices
Result or deliverablePeriodic monitoring reports based on social media data
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 216 a 221. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1356.

Ejemplo 5 · A theme recorded as an action

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSocial Protection Focalization
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base3 rows (IDs 230, 231, 232)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name is a theme. It does not say what was produced or for whom. The work behind these rows was analytical evidence on targeting delivered to social protection authorities, which is what the record must state.
Regla o criterioRegla 5. Techo de agregación
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of analytical evidence on social protection targeting for national programmes
DescriptionAnalysis of the targeting mechanisms of the national social protection programmes, delivered to the responsible authorities through the country offices. The action leaves a targeting analysis delivered to the counterpart.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionChile, Mexico
RecipientSocial protection authorities through country offices
Result or deliverableTargeting analysis delivered to the national counterpart
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workInclusive Growth
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 230, 231 y 232. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1357.

Ejemplo 6 · A single publication entered three times

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action namePolicy Note No 31 – Gobernanza preventiva y anticipatoria para el litio en Bolivia
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base3 rows (IDs 3042, 3044, 3051)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaOne publication was entered three times, most likely once per reporting moment. Under rule 6 an action that spans several periods keeps its identifier and is updated through the status field. It is not entered again.
Regla o criterioRegla 6. Continuidad entre períodos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionPublication of Policy Note 31 on preventive and anticipatory governance of lithium in Bolivia
DescriptionPreparation, editing and publication of Policy Note 31 of the regional series, addressed to the regional policy audience and to the institutions responsible for lithium governance. The action leaves the note published and available.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionBolivia
RecipientRegional policy audience and national institutions on lithium governance
Result or deliverablePolicy Note 31 published
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workEnvironment Team
Parent projectUNDP LAC Policy Note Series
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 3042, 3044 y 3051. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1416.

Ejemplo 7 · Countries embedded in the title of a paper

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameWorking Paper No 37 – Labour income inequality in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico: 2012–2019
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 277)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThis record was not duplicated, and it still shows the pattern the rule addresses. The five countries are part of the title of the publication and they must also be recorded in the scope attribute, so that the dashboard can count coverage without reading titles.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 aplicada al alcance de una publicación
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionPublication of Working Paper 37 on labour income inequality in five countries of the region
DescriptionPreparation and publication of Working Paper 37, which analyses labour income inequality between 2012 and 2019 in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico. The action leaves the paper published.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico
RecipientRegional policy audience
Result or deliverableWorking Paper 37 published
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectUNDP LAC Working Paper Series
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 277. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1435.

Ejemplo 8 · An editorial series and its parent project

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action namePolicy Note No14 – Mapping Care: Innovative tools for georeferencing care supply and demand in Latin America and the Caribbean
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2067)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaEach note of the series is one action because each one has its own product and its own closing point. The series is not an action, it is the container, and it belongs in the parent project field. This is the same logic that rule 3 applies to projects.
Regla o criterioRegla 3. El proyecto es contenedor
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionPublication of Policy Note 14 on innovative tools for georeferencing care supply and demand
DescriptionPreparation and publication of Policy Note 14 of the regional series, addressed to the institutions responsible for care policies in the region. The action leaves the note published.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientCare policy institutions
Result or deliverablePolicy Note 14 published
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGender
Parent projectUNDP LAC Policy Note Series
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2067. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1399.

Ejemplo 9 · Participation in a forum convened by others

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameXIII Forum for Sustainable Development in LAC
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 225)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaAttending a forum convened by a third party is not an action. It becomes one only when UNDP contributes a substantive product, such as a report, a session designed by the team or a technical input for the negotiation. The record is reformulated in those terms and, if there was no such product, it is not recorded.
Regla o criterioCaso límite. Foros de terceros
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSubstantive contribution of UNDP to the XIII Forum for Sustainable Development in Latin America and the Caribbean
DescriptionPreparation and presentation of the substantive inputs contributed by UNDP to the Forum, addressed to Member States and to the United Nations system. The action leaves the inputs presented and documented in the Forum proceedings.
Service typeMulti-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientMember States and United Nations system
Result or deliverableUNDP substantive inputs presented at the Forum
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 225. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1483.

Ejemplo 10 · Roundtable series convened by the team

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameFourth Sector Roundtables
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base5 rows, one per country (IDs 209 to 213)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaA series of roundtables held in five countries within the same regional exercise generated five records. The convening service, the audience and the objective are the same, so it is one action with the five countries in scope and the documented conclusions as the deliverable.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 aplicada a una serie de eventos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionConvening of the Fourth Sector Roundtables with regional private sector and social economy actors
DescriptionConvening and delivery of the roundtable series with fourth sector actors in the participating countries, with the systematization of the conclusions of each session. The action leaves the series held with documented conclusions.
Service typeMulti-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico
RecipientFourth sector actors, private sector and social economy organizations
Result or deliverableRoundtable series held with documented conclusions
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workInclusive Growth
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 209 a 213. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1481.

Ejemplo 11 · Two conferences inside a longer programme

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameCapacity building on public administration Government of Cuba
Description as recorded2 conferences in performance-based budgeting diploma
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2959)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaTwo conferences delivered inside a diploma programme are close to the materiality threshold. They qualify as an action because they are the contribution of the team to a structured programme and they leave a defined product, the delivered modules. Had it been a single lecture, it would have been a milestone.
Regla o criterioRegla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of capacity building on performance based budgeting for public officials of the Government
DescriptionDelivery of the two conferences contributed by the team to the performance based budgeting diploma addressed to public officials. The action leaves the two modules delivered within the programme.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionCuba
RecipientPublic officials of the Government
Result or deliverableTwo conferences delivered within the budgeting diploma
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2959. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1479.

Ejemplo 12 · Publication and launch in the same action

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action namePublication Crecimiento e Innovación en Tiempos Inciertos en América Latina
Description as recordedBook published during the SEGIB Summit 2023 in Dominican Republic
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2130)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record is well formulated. The launch at the summit is a milestone of the publication and not a separate action, because it did not generate communication products of its own. It only needs an action noun at the beginning of the name.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionPublication of the book Crecimiento e Innovación en Tiempos Inciertos en América Latina
DescriptionPreparation, editing and publication of the book, launched during the 2023 SEGIB Summit. The launch is a milestone of this action. The action leaves the book published and publicly available.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientRegional policy audience and SEGIB Summit participants
Result or deliverableBook published and launched at the 2023 SEGIB Summit
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2130. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1477.

Ejemplo 13 · A data note of a recurring series

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameGraph For Thought – (Still) Under the Mattress: LAC Incomplete Bancarization
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base2 rows (IDs 2998 and 2999)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe same edition of the series was entered twice. Each edition is one action, the series is the parent container, and repeated entries across reporting moments are avoided by updating the status instead of creating a new record.
Regla o criterioRegla 6 y proyecto contenedor
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionPublication of the Graph for Thought edition on incomplete financial inclusion in the region
DescriptionPreparation and publication of the edition of the data analysis series devoted to incomplete financial inclusion in Latin America and the Caribbean. The action leaves the note published.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientRegional policy audience
Result or deliverableData analysis note published
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG & Policy
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectGraph for Thought series
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2998 y 2999. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1461.

6.5 Inclusive Growth

El equipo aportó 176 registros con 77 nombres distintos, 2,29 filas por acción, el segundo promedio más alto de la base. Casi toda esa duplicación proviene de la cartera de financiamiento del desarrollo, donde cada servicio prestado a las oficinas de país se registró una vez por país. Ocho acciones concentran 86 filas. El segundo patrón del equipo es el nombre que empieza con Support to the CO, que describe una relación y no un servicio, y que obliga al agente a preguntar qué se entregó y qué quedó instalado.

13 pares de ejemplo

Ejemplo 1 · The most duplicated financing service of the team

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to the CO for the design and implementation of government-led Integrated National Financing Framework (INFF) or INFF component
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base14 rows, one per country (IDs 118 to 129, 2147 and 2148)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe same service was recorded fourteen times because fourteen country offices received it. The name also describes a relationship with the office rather than the service delivered to the government. The action is the accompaniment for the establishment of the framework and its result is the framework or component adopted.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSupport to country offices for the establishment of government led Integrated National Financing Frameworks
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the country offices and to their national finance counterparts for the design and implementation of the Integrated National Financing Framework or of one of its components. The action leaves the framework or the component adopted by the government.
Service typeResource mobilization and development finance (F11)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Belize, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Grenada, Guatemala, Haiti, Jamaica, Mexico, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Uruguay
RecipientCountry offices and ministries of finance with INFF processes
Result or deliverableINFF or INFF component adopted by the government
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectTax and Development Finance portfolio
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 118 a 129, 2147 y 2148. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0716.

Ejemplo 2 · Two services under one name, product and event

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to the CO through SDG Investor Map and SDG Investment Facilitation events
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base14 rows, one per country (IDs 164 to 177)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record joins the production of an investor map, which is a knowledge product, with the delivery of investment facilitation events, which is convening. In the historical base both were kept together because they belong to a single development finance service. For the new cycle the recommendation is to split them, since the map has its own publication and the events have their own audience and their own closing point.
Regla o criterioRegla 1 aplicada con criterio
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the SDG Investor Maps with country offices
DescriptionPreparation and publication of the SDG Investor Map with the country offices and the national private sector actors, identifying investment opportunities aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals. The action leaves a published map per country.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay
RecipientCountry offices and national private sector actors
Result or deliverableSDG Investor Map published in each participating country
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectSDG Investor Map
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of the SDG investment facilitation events with country offices
DescriptionOrganization and delivery of the investment facilitation events that connect the opportunities identified in the maps with private investors. The action leaves the events held with documented investment interest.
Service typeResource mobilization and development finance (F11)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay
RecipientCountry offices, national private sector actors and investors
Result or deliverableInvestment facilitation events held with documented investor interest
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectSDG Investor Map
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 164 a 177. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0718, que en el nuevo ciclo se recomienda cargar como dos acciones.

Ejemplo 3 · Global programme rolled out country by country

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to the CO for the Tax Inspectors without Borders programme
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base13 rows, one per country (IDs 147 to 159)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaA single corporate programme generated thirteen records. The programme is the container and the service is the accompaniment for its rollout with the national tax administrations. One action, with the countries as scope and the programme as parent project.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y regla 3
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSupport to country offices for the rollout of the Tax Inspectors Without Borders programme
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the country offices and to the national tax administrations for the establishment and operation of the Tax Inspectors Without Borders programme. The action leaves the programme operating with the tax administration of each participating country.
Service typeResource mobilization and development finance (F11)
Country, countries or regionAruba, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Paraguay, Peru
RecipientNational tax administrations through country offices
Result or deliverableTIWB programme operating with the national tax administration
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectTax Inspectors Without Borders
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 147 a 159. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0719.

Ejemplo 4 · Advisory service duplicated across thirteen countries

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to the CO on thematic debt instruments and debt management
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base13 rows, one per country (IDs 188 to 197, 2146, 2150 and 2978)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThirteen records for one advisory service. The record also lacks a result. Advisory on debt is not concluded by the fact of advising, it is concluded when the government adopts an instrument or a management measure. That is what the description must state.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionAdvisory support to country offices on thematic debt instruments and public debt management
DescriptionTechnical advice to the country offices and to the ministries of finance on the design of thematic debt instruments and on public debt management measures. The action leaves an instrument or a management measure adopted by the government.
Service typeResource mobilization and development finance (F11)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Paraguay, Suriname, Uruguay
RecipientMinistries of finance through country offices
Result or deliverableThematic debt instrument or debt management measure adopted by the government
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectTax and Development Finance portfolio
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 188 a 197, 2146, 2150 y 2978. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0712.

Ejemplo 5 · Standard assessment applied in ten countries

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to the CO for conducting a Development Finance Assessment (DFA)
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base10 rows, one per country (IDs 130 to 139)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe Development Finance Assessment is a standard instrument applied with the same methodology in each country. Since there is no differentiated methodological adaptation, rule 2 applies and the ten records become one action. If a country had required a substantially adapted methodology, that adaptation would be a separate action.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y caso límite de instrumentos replicables
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSupport to country offices for conducting Development Finance Assessments
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the country offices in the application of the Development Finance Assessment methodology and in the validation of its results with the government. The action leaves a completed and validated assessment per country.
Service typeResource mobilization and development finance (F11)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Barbados, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Grenada, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
RecipientCountry offices conducting the assessments
Result or deliverableDevelopment Finance Assessment completed and validated with the government
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectTax and Development Finance portfolio
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 130 a 139. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0714.

Ejemplo 6 · Budget support duplicated by country

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to the CO for Budgeting for the SDGs
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base9 rows, one per country (IDs 140 to 146, 2149 and 2151)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaNine records for one methodological service delivered to ministries of finance. The name says support and not what was delivered. The result is the application of the methodology to the national budget cycle.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSupport to country offices for budgeting for the SDGs processes with national finance authorities
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the country offices and to the ministries of finance in the application of the SDG budgeting methodology to the national budget cycle. The action leaves the methodology applied to the budget cycle.
Service typeResource mobilization and development finance (F11)
Country, countries or regionColombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Haiti, Jamaica, Panama, Paraguay, Peru
RecipientMinistries of finance through country offices
Result or deliverableSDG budgeting methodology applied to the national budget cycle
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectTax and Development Finance portfolio
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 140 a 146, 2149 y 2151. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0713.

Ejemplo 7 · Methodological support classified as advisory and not as finance

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to the CO for SDG Impact Measurement and Management
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base8 rows, one per country (IDs 2152 to 2159)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThis record sits close to the finance portfolio and yet its service is different. What the team transferred was a measurement and management approach, which is technical assistance and not resource mobilization. The agent must choose the service type by what was delivered, not by the portfolio the work belongs to.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio. Elección del tipo correcto
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance to country offices on SDG impact measurement and management
DescriptionTransfer of the SDG impact measurement and management standards to the country offices so that they can apply them in their portfolios. The action leaves the approach applied by the office.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionBrazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica, Paraguay, Uruguay
RecipientCountry offices applying the SDG impact standards
Result or deliverableImpact measurement and management approach applied by the country office
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectSDG Impact
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2152 a 2159. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0684.

Ejemplo 8 · Programme formulation recorded per country

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to the CO for the Joint SDG Fund Component 2 programmes (blended finance)
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base5 rows, one per country (IDs 178 to 182)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaFive records for one formulation service delivered under the same fund. The fund is a funding attribute and the action is the design of the blended finance programme submitted to it.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y regla 3
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSupport to country offices for the design of blended finance programmes under Joint SDG Fund Component 2
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the country offices in the formulation of the blended finance programmes presented to Component 2 of the Joint SDG Fund. The action leaves the programme formulated and submitted to the fund.
Service typeProgramme design, formulation and scale-up (F09)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Grenada, Jamaica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay
RecipientCountry offices with Joint SDG Fund programmes
Result or deliverableBlended finance programme formulated and submitted to the Fund
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectJoint SDG Fund Component 2
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 178 a 182. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0715. En el registro original el tipo de servicio quedó clasificado como financiamiento. Al reescribirlo se observa que el servicio es la formulación, de modo que corresponde F09.

Ejemplo 9 · Same methodology transferred with different depth

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameTransfer of the InMotion methodology. SDG Value Chains Programme
Description as recordedFour rows carry variants of this name. One is a phase one training course in the Dominican Republic, one is national capacity building in Cuba, one is capacity building plus pilot implementation in Chile, and one transfers a different pair of methodologies in Paraguay.
Rows in the base4 rows (IDs 299, 306, 2777, 2761)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThese records are not duplicates. Each one has a different recipient, a different scope and a different closing point, so they remain separate actions. The Chile record does need to be split, because it combines training with a pilot implementation and those are two service types.
Regla o criterioCriterio de no unificación y regla 1
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of national training on the InMotion methodology for value chain institutions
DescriptionTraining of the national institutions that support micro, small and medium enterprises in the InMotion methodology. The action leaves national teams trained in the methodology.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionCuba
RecipientNational institutions supporting MSMEs
Result or deliverableTraining delivered with trained national teams
OriginSupply
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectSDG Value Chains Programme
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionPilot implementation of the InMotion methodology with national institutions and enterprises
DescriptionPilot application of the InMotion methodology with the national institutions and the enterprises that participated in the training, with documentation of the results of the pilot. The action leaves the methodology tested in the national context.
Service typeInnovation and digital transformation (F08)
Country, countries or regionChile
RecipientNational institutions and MSMEs
Result or deliverableMethodology piloted with documented results
OriginSupply
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectSDG Value Chains Programme
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 306 y 2777. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-0689 y A-0693, esta última dividida en dos para el nuevo ciclo.

Ejemplo 10 · Regional narrative and offer

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameDevelop a consolidated regional narrative and offer on territorial development and SDG localization
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2493)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaDefining a regional narrative and a service offer is strategic positioning, which is F01 and not policy advice. The record is well bounded because the narrative is approved at a given point. It only needs a description and a recipient.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDevelopment of the consolidated regional narrative and offer on territorial development and SDG localization
DescriptionDefinition of the regional narrative and of the associated service offer on territorial development and SDG localization, for use by RBLAC and the country offices. The action leaves an approved narrative and service offer.
Service typeStrategic thinking and thought leadership (F01)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientRBLAC and LAC country offices
Result or deliverableRegional narrative and service offer approved
OriginSupply
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2493. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0648.

Ejemplo 11 · Partnership mobilization with committed resources

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameMobilize decentralized cooperation partnerships in support to territorial development, local economic development and SDG localization initiatives in countries
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2496)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record could be read as resource mobilization because it mentions partnerships that bring resources. It is classified as convening and partnerships because the deliverable is the partnership agreement itself. When the deliverable is the funding secured for a specific initiative, the service type is resource mobilization.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio. Alianza frente a movilización
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionMobilization of decentralized cooperation partnerships for territorial development and SDG localization
DescriptionIdentification and formalization of partnerships with decentralized cooperation actors to support territorial development and SDG localization initiatives in the participating countries. The action leaves partnership agreements established with committed resources.
Service typeMulti-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientDecentralized cooperation partners and participating countries
Result or deliverablePartnership agreements established with committed resources
OriginSupply
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2496. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0700.

Ejemplo 12 · Monitoring of a programme, not of a policy

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameMonitoring and systematization of support to MSMEs in the region. SDG Value Chain Programme
Description as recordedStandardised data collection of implementation of SDG Value Chain Programme
Rows in the base1 row (ID 294)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record is about monitoring the team own programme, which is monitoring, evaluation and learning. It should not be confused with the implementation of the programme, which is a different action under F10. The distinction matters because the two are counted separately.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio. Elección entre F12 y F10
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionMonitoring and systematization of the MSME support delivered under the SDG Value Chains Programme
DescriptionStandardized collection of implementation data of the SDG Value Chains Programme and systematization of the support delivered to micro, small and medium enterprises. The action leaves a standardized monitoring dataset and a systematization report.
Service typeMonitoring, evaluation and learning (F12)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientProgramme management and participating country offices
Result or deliverableStandardized monitoring dataset and systematization report
OriginSupply
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectSDG Value Chains Programme
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 294. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0728.

Ejemplo 13 · Local technical assistance well formulated

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameAccelerate SDG localization in the city of Cuenca, Ecuador
Description as recordedProvision of technical support in the process of elaborating a participatory Voluntary Local Review
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2498)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name states a purpose, accelerating localization, which does not close. The description states the actual service, the accompaniment for the Voluntary Local Review. The correction consists of moving the service into the name and the purpose into the description.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance to the city of Cuenca for the elaboration of its participatory Voluntary Local Review
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the municipality in the participatory process of elaborating the Voluntary Local Review, as a contribution to the acceleration of SDG localization in the city. The action leaves an elaborated review.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionEcuador
RecipientMunicipality of Cuenca
Result or deliverableVoluntary Local Review elaborated
OriginDemand
Lead teamInclusive Growth
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2498. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0686.

6.6 Disaster Risk Reduction

El equipo tiene la base más limpia de los ocho, con 80 registros y 80 nombres distintos, es decir una fila por acción. Además es el único equipo sin registros vacíos en el campo de descripción. Sus ejemplos sirven menos para corregir duplicación y más para enseñar dos cosas. La primera es cuándo un mismo servicio prestado en países distintos se unifica y cuándo no. La segunda es cómo separar la formación del ejercicio práctico que la acompaña.

12 pares de ejemplo

Ejemplo 1 · A subregional programme recorded once per country

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameRecovery Preparedness in the Caribbean – EUCARES Belize
Description as recordedCapacity strengthening of 06 prioritized country offices through a 3 year programme: Belize (other countries: Cuba, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Jamaica, and Saint Vincent & the Grenadines)
Rows in the base6 rows, one per country (IDs 3032 to 3037)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe description itself declares that this is one three year programme covering six country offices, and yet the record was entered six times with the country appended to the name. One action with the six countries in the scope attribute.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of recovery preparedness capacity strengthening under EUCARES
DescriptionThree year capacity strengthening programme on recovery preparedness for the six prioritized country offices and their national institutions. The action leaves the recovery preparedness capacities strengthened in the participating offices.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionBelize, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Jamaica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
RecipientCountry offices and national institutions
Result or deliverableRecovery preparedness capacities strengthened in the six country offices
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectEUCARES
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 3032 a 3037. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0033.

Ejemplo 2 · One regional workshop recorded once per participating country

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameTraining Cuba Government officials in Risk-informed development
Description as recordedRepresentatives from the Government of Cuba and UNDP focal points participated in a training workshop held in Panama, June 2023. Within this training, the country experiences from Cuba, Colombia, Costa Rica and others were shared.
Rows in the base4 rows (IDs 2138 to 2141)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaA single workshop held in Panama was recorded once for each country whose officials attended. The rule for training programmes is one action per programme and period, with the countries and the cohorts as attributes.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y caso límite de cohortes
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of the training workshop on risk informed development for government officials
DescriptionRegional training workshop on risk informed development delivered to government officials and UNDP focal points of the participating countries, with an exchange of country experiences. The action leaves the officials trained in the methodology.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionCosta Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Panama
RecipientGovernment officials and UNDP focal points
Result or deliverableOfficials trained in the risk informed development methodology
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2138, 2139, 2140 y 2141. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0042.

Ejemplo 3 · Same service in different countries that must stay separate

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameTraining in disaster recovery needs assessment (PDNA) methodology in Costa Rica, and Training in disaster recovery needs assessment (PDNA) and management framework (DRF) in Colombia
Description as recordedIn Costa Rica a team of public servants from sectoral institutions was trained. In Colombia the training was delivered with the National Disaster Risk Management Unit and the National Planning Department.
Rows in the base2 rows (IDs 1816 and 1817)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThese two records look like the same service repeated by country, and yet they must not be merged. Each one has its own recipient institution, its own agreed content and its own closing point. Rule 2 removes the country from the identity of the action only when the service, the recipient and the result are the same. Here the recipient differs, so there are two actions.
Regla o criterioCriterio de no unificación. Destinatario y resultado distintos
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of training on the post disaster needs assessment methodology in Costa Rica
DescriptionTraining of a team of public servants from sectoral institutions in the post disaster needs assessment methodology. The action leaves a trained sectoral team available for future assessments.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionCosta Rica
RecipientPublic servants of sectoral institutions
Result or deliverableSectoral team trained in the PDNA methodology
OriginDemand
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of training on the post disaster needs assessment and recovery framework methodologies in Colombia
DescriptionTraining of government officials in both methodologies, delivered jointly with the National Disaster Risk Management Unit and the National Planning Department. The action leaves the officials of both institutions trained.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionColombia
RecipientNational Disaster Risk Management Unit and National Planning Department
Result or deliverableGovernment officials of both institutions trained
OriginDemand
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1816 y 1817. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-0045 y A-0043.

Ejemplo 4 · Training and simulation exercise in one record

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameTraining in disaster recovery needs assessment (PDNA) and support to disaster simulation and drill exercise in Panama
Description as recordedPDNA/DRF training and simulation exercise developed in Panama in May and June 2023
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1984)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe simulation exercise is the practical component of the training and it does not leave a product of its own. It is a milestone of the training action and not a second action. The record stays as one and the exercise moves into the description.
Regla o criterioRegla 4. El hito no es una acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of training on post disaster needs assessment in Panama
DescriptionTraining of government officials and response institutions in the post disaster needs assessment and recovery framework methodologies, including a simulation and drill exercise as the practical component of the course. The action leaves the officials trained with the exercise completed.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionPanama
RecipientGovernment officials and response institutions
Result or deliverableTraining and simulation exercise completed
OriginDemand
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1984. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0039.

Ejemplo 5 · Permanent line of work with no closing point

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameMainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation into development processes
Description as recordedThe global guideline for mainstreaming CCA and DRR into development planning, programming and budgeting will be used to develop country experiences in this topic. A regional workshop was held in June.
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1832)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaMainstreaming into development processes describes a permanent aspiration of the team. It never ends and it covers more than one output. The record must be narrowed to the technical assistance actually delivered in the period, with the institutions that received it.
Regla o criterioRegla 5. Techo de agregación
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation into development planning
DescriptionApplication of the global mainstreaming guideline with the planning and budget institutions of the participating countries, with the documentation of the resulting country experiences. The action leaves the guideline applied and the experiences documented.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientPlanning and budget institutions
Result or deliverableGlobal guideline applied with documented country experiences
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workEnvironment Team
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1832. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0009.

Ejemplo 6 · Two services in one record, stocktaking and dissemination

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameDissemination of UNDP urban risk strategy and guidelines, supported on UNDP LAC initiatives
Description as recordedStocktaking of urban disaster risk management initiatives in LAC and dissemination of global guidelines in this topic
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1830)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record contains a stocktaking exercise, which is knowledge production, and a dissemination effort, which is knowledge management and exchange. They are two service types and therefore two actions, linked to each other because the second uses the product of the first.
Regla o criterioRegla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the stocktaking of urban disaster risk management initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean
DescriptionIdentification and systematization of the urban disaster risk management initiatives under way in the region. The action leaves a completed stocktaking that serves as the basis for the dissemination action.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientCountry offices and urban risk institutions
Result or deliverableStocktaking of urban risk initiatives completed
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDissemination of the UNDP urban risk strategy and guidelines in Latin America and the Caribbean
DescriptionDissemination of the corporate urban risk strategy and of the associated guidelines among country offices and urban risk institutions, using the results of the regional stocktaking. The action leaves the guidelines transferred to the target audience.
Service typeKnowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientCountry offices and urban risk institutions
Result or deliverableGlobal guidelines disseminated among the target institutions
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1830. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0048, que en el nuevo ciclo se carga como dos acciones.

Ejemplo 7 · Systematization and proposal writing in one record

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action namePreparation of project proposals in urban risk management, early warning systems and resilience
Description as recordedSystematization of DRR and recovery experiences in LAC and prepare project proposals in urban risk management, EWS, and resilience
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2368)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaSystematizing experiences is knowledge management and formulating proposals is programme design. The two share an input but they have different recipients, different products and different closing points.
Regla o criterioRegla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSystematization of disaster risk reduction and recovery experiences in Latin America and the Caribbean
DescriptionSystematization of the disaster risk reduction and recovery experiences accumulated in the region, organized so that they can be reused by country offices. The action leaves a completed systematization.
Service typeKnowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientCountry offices and regional practitioners
Result or deliverableSystematization of regional experiences completed
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionFormulation of project proposals on urban risk management, early warning systems and resilience
DescriptionPreparation of project proposals on urban risk management, early warning systems and resilience, developed with country offices and addressed to prospective donors. The action leaves the proposals prepared and submitted.
Service typeProgramme design, formulation and scale-up (F09)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientCountry offices and prospective donors
Result or deliverableProject proposals prepared and submitted
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2368. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0053, que en el nuevo ciclo se carga como dos acciones.

Ejemplo 8 · Adaptation of global guidelines to a national context

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameAdaptation of disaster recovery needs assessment and management framework guidelines in El Salvador
Description as recordedThe PDNA and DRF global guidelines were adapted to country context in close collaboration with respective Government sectoral institutions
Rows in the base2 rows (IDs 1813 and 1976)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe same adaptation process was entered twice, once for El Salvador and once for Costa Rica, with equivalent recipients and an identical product. Here the recipient is of the same nature in both countries, sectoral government institutions, so rule 2 applies and the two records become one.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 con destinatario equivalente
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionAdaptation of the post disaster needs assessment and recovery framework guidelines to the national context
DescriptionAdaptation of the global PDNA and DRF guidelines to the national context, carried out with the sectoral government institutions of each country. The action leaves the adapted guidelines adopted by the counterparts.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionCosta Rica, El Salvador
RecipientSectoral government institutions
Result or deliverableAdapted PDNA and DRF guidelines adopted by the counterpart
OriginDemand
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1813 y 1976. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0006.

Ejemplo 9 · Urban intervention recorded once per city

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport urban risk management intervention in Barbados
Description as recordedUnder the subregional programme for the Caribbean, in urban disaster risk management, the intervention in the capital city of Barbados is supported
Rows in the base3 rows (IDs 2135 to 2137)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThree cities of the same subregional programme produced three records. The programme is the container and the service is the same in all three cases. One action with the countries as scope and the programme as the parent project.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y regla 3
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSupport to the urban risk management interventions of the Caribbean subregional programme
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the urban risk management interventions in the capital cities covered by the subregional programme, including the local authorities responsible for each one. The action leaves the interventions implemented in the participating cities.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Dominica, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
RecipientMunicipal authorities of the participating cities
Result or deliverableUrban risk interventions implemented in the participating cities
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectUrban Risk Global Initiative
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2135, 2136 y 2137. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0060.

Ejemplo 10 · Technical assistance inside a third party project

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameRecovery and nexus to development elements into humanitarian information systems in Central America
Description as recordedWithin the Swiss Development Agency project aimed at strengthening capacities in disaster response, having OCHA as implementing partner, UNDP is promoting the integration of recovery and development elements
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2144)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record starts from the project and not from the service. What UNDP contributed was technical assistance so that recovery and development criteria would be incorporated into the humanitarian information systems. The project moves to the parent project field.
Regla o criterioRegla 3. El proyecto es contenedor
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance for the integration of recovery and development elements into humanitarian information systems in Central America
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to OCHA and to the national response institutions for the incorporation of recovery and development criteria into the humanitarian information systems of the subregion. The action leaves the criteria integrated into the systems.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionCentral America
RecipientOCHA and national response institutions in Central America
Result or deliverableRecovery and development criteria integrated into the information systems
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectSwiss Development Agency disaster response project
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2144. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0014.

Ejemplo 11 · Case study well formulated

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSystematization of PDNA/DRF initiative in El Salvador
Description as recordedThis case study seeks to analyze and document the contributions of the PDNA and DRF to post-disaster recovery in El Salvador, including its ability to be adapted
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1826)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record identifies a single service, a verifiable product and an audience. It only needs a slight adjustment of the name so that it starts with an action noun. This is the standard the agent should propose.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSystematization of the post disaster needs assessment and recovery framework experience in El Salvador
DescriptionCase study that analyses and documents the contribution of the PDNA and the DRF to post disaster recovery in the country, including their capacity to be adapted to other contexts. The action leaves a published case study.
Service typeKnowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06)
Country, countries or regionEl Salvador
RecipientRecovery institutions and regional practitioners
Result or deliverableCase study published
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1826. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0049.

Ejemplo 12 · Project formulation well formulated

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameFormulation of Regional project in urban disaster risk reduction in Central America
Description as recordedMulti-country urban disaster risk management proposal prepared with the collaboration of four country offices (Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras)
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1831)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record already satisfies the five attributes. One service type, a verifiable product, an identifiable recipient, a responsible team and a foreseeable closing point. It is kept almost unchanged and the four countries move into the scope attribute.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionFormulation of the regional project on urban disaster risk reduction in Central America
DescriptionPreparation of the multi country project proposal on urban disaster risk management, developed with the four participating country offices. The action leaves a prepared proposal ready for submission.
Service typeProgramme design, formulation and scale-up (F09)
Country, countries or regionDominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras
RecipientParticipating country offices
Result or deliverableMulti country project proposal prepared
OriginSupply
Lead teamDisaster Risk Reduction
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1831. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0055.

6.7 HIV and Health

El equipo aportó 68 registros con 38 nombres distintos, lo que da 1,79 filas por acción. La duplicación por país es alta y se concentra en el trabajo de inclusión socioeconómica de poblaciones LGBTI en el Caribe, donde cada producto se registró una vez por cada uno de los cuatro países del programa. Aparecen además dos patrones que el agente debe aprender a corregir. El primero es el uso del año como prefijo del nombre. El segundo es el nombre administrativo tomado del instrumento de financiamiento, como country envelope, que no describe ningún servicio.

13 pares de ejemplo

Ejemplo 1 · Financing instrument used as the name of the action

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport country envelope implementation
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base5 rows, one per country (IDs 1847, 1849 to 1852)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaCountry envelope is the name of a funding instrument, not of a service. The record does not allow a reader to know what was implemented, with whom or with what result. The action must name the component that was executed and the funding instrument moves to the funding fields.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio y unidad de propósito
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionImplementation of the country envelope components on HIV and key populations
DescriptionExecution of the components financed through the country envelopes with the national counterparts in each participating country, including the technical accompaniment of the implementing partners. The action leaves the components implemented with documented results.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionDominican Republic, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Paraguay
RecipientNational counterparts executing the components
Result or deliverableCountry envelope components implemented with documented results
OriginSupply
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectGlobal Fund country envelopes
StatusClosed
NOTA PARA EL AGENTE
Cuando los componentes ejecutados en cada país sean sustantivamente distintos, corresponde una acción por componente y no por país. El criterio es el resultado, no el desembolso.
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1847, 1849, 1850, 1851 y 1852. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0641.

Ejemplo 2 · A single regional forum recorded four times

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport meaningful engagement of governments through national and regional policy dialogues – Private sector LGBTI inclusion best practices regional forum
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base4 rows (IDs 1790, 1791, 1792, 1794)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaOne regional forum was recorded once per participating country. The name also mixes a permanent purpose, supporting meaningful engagement, with the concrete event that was delivered. The action is the forum and the purpose belongs in the description.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionConvening of the regional forum on private sector best practices for LGBTI inclusion
DescriptionConvening and delivery of the regional forum that brought together governments, private sector representatives and LGBTI organizations to exchange inclusion practices. The action leaves the forum held with documented policy dialogue conclusions.
Service typeMulti-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Jamaica
RecipientGovernments, private sector and LGBTI organizations
Result or deliverableRegional forum held with policy dialogue conclusions
OriginSupply
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1790, 1791, 1792 y 1794. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0638.

Ejemplo 3 · Name that contradicts the scope it declares

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSmall grants to LGBTI CSOs in 4 countries – Dominican Republic
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base4 rows (IDs 1797, 2582, 2583, 2584)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name announces four countries and then names only one, because the row was replicated per country and each copy kept a different country appended. The country must leave the name and move to the scope attribute.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y unidad de destinatario
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTransfer of small grants to LGBTI civil society organizations
DescriptionSelection of LGBTI civil society organizations and transfer of small grants for the execution of their inclusion initiatives, with technical accompaniment during the execution. The action leaves the grants transferred and executed by the selected organizations.
Service typeProgramme implementation and oversight (F10)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica
RecipientLGBTI civil society organizations
Result or deliverableGrants transferred and executed by the selected organizations
OriginSupply
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1797, 2582, 2583 y 2584. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0647.

Ejemplo 4 · The year used as a prefix of the name

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action name2024 – Assessment of challenges that limit the participation of trans women in the workforce and develop a roadmap to address barriers
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base4 rows, one per country (IDs 2349, 2350, 2351, 2585)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe year is placed inside the name because there was no reliable period field. Under rule 6 the period is an attribute and the action keeps its identifier across periods. The record also joins an assessment with the roadmap that derives from it, which is acceptable because both belong to the same knowledge production service.
Regla o criterioUnidad de tiempo. El período es un atributo
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the assessment of barriers to labour force participation of trans women and the corresponding roadmap
DescriptionAnalysis of the barriers that limit the participation of trans women in the labour market in the participating countries and preparation of the roadmap to address them, delivered to the labour and social institutions. The action leaves the assessment and the roadmap delivered.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica
RecipientLabour and social institutions
Result or deliverableAssessment and roadmap delivered
OriginSupply
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGender
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2349, 2350, 2351 y 2585. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0620.

Ejemplo 5 · Three sequential steps written as one long name

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSocioeconomic inclusion roadmap for LGBTI persons: mapping the decision-making process, identifying decision-making audiences, and developing of national plans for advocacy
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base4 rows, one per country (IDs 1858, 1859, 1860, 1890)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name lists the internal steps of the work rather than the service. Mapping and identifying audiences are stages of the same advisory process and do not become separate actions. What matters is that the name states the service and that the description keeps the stages as milestones.
Regla o criterioRegla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDevelopment of national socioeconomic inclusion roadmaps and advocacy plans for LGBTI people
DescriptionAdvisory to national institutions and LGBTI organizations for the elaboration of the socioeconomic inclusion roadmap and of the national advocacy plans that derive from it. The mapping of decision making processes and audiences is a stage of this action. The action leaves the roadmap and the plans delivered.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica
RecipientNational institutions and LGBTI organizations
Result or deliverableRoadmap and national advocacy plans delivered
OriginSupply
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1858, 1859, 1860 y 1890. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0632.

Ejemplo 6 · Placeholder left unresolved in the record

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameDiagnostic on HIV sensitive social protection covering xxx (SP agencies in the country). How HIV people benefit from SP programs
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1857)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record kept the placeholder xxx where the institutions should be named. The formulario should not allow saving a record whose recipient is not identifiable. The agent must ask for the institution before proposing the final wording.
Regla o criterioUnidad de destinatario
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the diagnostic on HIV sensitive social protection
DescriptionAnalysis of the access of people living with HIV to the national social protection programmes, prepared with the social protection agencies of the country. The action leaves a delivered diagnostic with recommendations.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionParaguay
RecipientNational social protection agencies [name the institutions]
Result or deliverableDiagnostic delivered on access of people living with HIV to social protection
OriginDemand
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workInclusive Growth
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1857. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0623.

Ejemplo 7 · Activity below the materiality threshold

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport pride activities
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1796)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaSupporting an activity organized by others, with no substantive product of its own, does not meet the materiality threshold. It is recorded as a milestone within the larger advocacy action to which it belongs. It is only registered as an action when UNDP contributes a product of its own, such as a campaign or a study presented at the event.
Regla o criterioRegla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionNot recorded as an action. Registered as a milestone of the advocacy action on LGBTI rights of the period
DescriptionThe support to pride activities is a means of execution. It is documented inside the description of the advocacy action that groups the visibility work of the period, stating the date and the contribution made.
Service typeNot applicable
Country, countries or regionDominican Republic
RecipientLGBTI organizations and communities
Result or deliverableNo deliverable of its own. It contributes to the deliverable of the parent advocacy action
OriginDemand
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusNot applicable
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1796. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0631, marcada como actividad puntual.

Ejemplo 8 · Dissemination event with its own product

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSub-regional webinar to share results of PEP Study
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1807)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaA webinar is normally a means of execution. It becomes an action when it is the dissemination vehicle of a substantive product, in this case the results of the post exposure prophylaxis study. The service type is advocacy and visibility, and it is a different action from the production of the study itself.
Regla o criterioCaso límite. Evento con producto sustantivo
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of the subregional webinar presenting the results of the post exposure prophylaxis study
DescriptionOrganization and delivery of the subregional webinar that presented the results of the post exposure prophylaxis study to health institutions and civil society. The action leaves the webinar held with the results disseminated to the target audience.
Service typeAdvocacy, communications and visibility (F03)
Country, countries or regionThe Caribbean
RecipientHealth institutions and civil society
Result or deliverableWebinar held with study results disseminated
OriginSupply
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1807. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0628.

Ejemplo 9 · Review that mixes three products of the same service

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action name2024 – Review of social assistance programmes, survey of trans women to determine bottlenecks and develop a strategy to address the bottlenecks
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base4 rows, one per country (IDs 2356, 2357, 2358, 2586)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record joins a documentary review, a survey and a strategy. All three belong to the same knowledge production service and feed a single deliverable, so they remain one action. Rule 1 asks for one service type per action, not for one product per action.
Regla o criterioRegla 1 aplicada con criterio
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the review of social assistance programmes and of the bottlenecks faced by trans women
DescriptionReview of the social assistance programmes, survey of trans women to identify access bottlenecks and preparation of the strategy to address them, delivered to the social assistance institutions. The action leaves the review, the survey results and the strategy delivered as a single body of evidence.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Jamaica
RecipientSocial assistance institutions
Result or deliverableReview, survey results and strategy delivered
OriginSupply
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workInclusive Growth
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2356, 2357, 2358 y 2586. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0624.

Ejemplo 10 · Regional convening well formulated

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameCaribbean Judges Forum on HIV Huaman Right and the Law
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2049)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record identifies an event convened by UNDP with an identifiable audience. It only needs an action verb at the beginning of the name, a description and the correction of the typing error. This is a convening action, not a training one, because its purpose is dialogue among peers.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionConvening of the Caribbean Judges Forum on HIV, human rights and the law
DescriptionConvening and delivery of the forum that brought together judges and justice institutions of the Caribbean to discuss the treatment of HIV in judicial practice. The action leaves the forum held with documented conclusions.
Service typeMulti-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships (F07)
Country, countries or regionThe Caribbean
RecipientJudges and justice institutions in the Caribbean
Result or deliverableForum held with documented conclusions
OriginSupply
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGovernance
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2049. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0637.

Ejemplo 11 · Digital solution recorded as continued support

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameVaccine Equity: Continued support to Guyana CO on Digital solution
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 1809)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaContinued support does not state a closing point. What the team did was to accompany the country office in putting a digital solution into operation with the health authorities. When the development of the tool and its deployment in a country are two distinct efforts, they are two actions. Here only the deployment corresponded to the team.
Regla o criterioCaso límite. Desarrollo y despliegue de una herramienta digital
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionSupport to the Guyana country office for the deployment of the digital vaccine equity solution
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the country office and to the national health authorities for the deployment and entry into operation of the digital vaccine equity solution. The action leaves the solution operating with the health authorities.
Service typeInnovation and digital transformation (F08)
Country, countries or regionGuyana
RecipientCountry office and national health authorities
Result or deliverableDigital solution operating with health authorities
OriginDemand
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectVaccine Equity
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 1809. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0639.

Ejemplo 12 · Index applied in two countries

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameLGBTI INCLUSION INDEX MEXICO
Description as recordedProvide technical support to the CO Mexico to apply, develop and publish the LGBTI Inclusion index for the country.
Rows in the base2 rows (IDs 2891 and 2892)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name is written in capitals and includes the country. The two rows correspond to two national applications of the same index. The rule for indices is that the methodological development is one action and each national process is an action only when it involves differentiated accompaniment. Here both applications followed the same protocol, so they are one action with two countries in scope.
Regla o criterioCaso límite. Índice que se implementa en varios países
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance to country offices for the application of the LGBTI Inclusion Index
DescriptionTechnical support to the country offices and their national counterparts for the application, adaptation and publication of the LGBTI Inclusion Index. The action leaves the index applied and published for each country covered.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionCosta Rica, Mexico
RecipientCountry offices and national counterparts
Result or deliverableIndex applied and published for the countries covered
OriginDemand
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectLGBTI Inclusion Index
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2891 y 2892. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0627.

Ejemplo 13 · National surveys recorded one per country

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameNational LGBTI surveys
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base4 rows (IDs 1801, 1802, 1803, 1864)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaA single survey instrument applied in four countries generated four records. The instrument, the methodology and the team are the same. One action with the four countries in scope, and the national reports as the deliverable.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionImplementation of the national LGBTI surveys
DescriptionApplication of the national LGBTI survey in the participating countries, including the processing of the data and the publication of the national reports. The action leaves the survey data and the reports published for each country.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionBarbados, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica
RecipientNational institutions and LGBTI organizations of the countries covered
Result or deliverableSurvey data and national reports published
OriginSupply
Lead teamHIV and Health
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 1801, 1802, 1803 y 1864. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-0618.

6.8 SDG Integration

El equipo aportó 52 registros al Dashboard 2.0, la cifra más baja de los ocho equipos, y sin embargo tiene el promedio más alto de filas por nombre de acción, 2,48. Dos patrones explican esa cifra. El primero es la repetición por país de productos regionales como los Integrated SDG Insights Reports. El segundo, y más importante para el agente, es el uso de un mismo nombre genérico, Support to COs to design implement and evaluate SDG Integration initiatives, para nueve servicios sustantivamente distintos, cuya única diferencia estaba escondida en el campo de descripción. Los ejemplos siguientes trabajan sobre esos dos patrones.

13 pares de ejemplo

Ejemplo 1 · Country duplication of a regional knowledge product

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameIntegrated SDG Insights Reports
Description as recordedIn preparation of the SDG Summit, support COs with a country analysis
Rows in the base13 rows, one per country office (IDs 2108 to 2119 and 2270)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaOne single production process was recorded thirteen times because thirteen country offices received a country analysis. The country is describing the scope of the action, not its identity. The five attributes are met only once, so this is one action.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the Integrated SDG Insights Reports for country offices ahead of the SDG Summit
DescriptionPreparation of the country level SDG insight analyses requested by the country offices in the run up to the SDG Summit. The action leaves a delivered analytical report per participating country office.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionArgentina, Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Haiti, Panama, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay
RecipientCountry offices preparing for the SDG Summit
Result or deliverableCountry level SDG insight analyses delivered to the thirteen country offices
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectIntegrated SDG Insights
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2108 to 2119 and 2270. Dashboard 3.0 action A-1494.

Ejemplo 2 · One generic name hiding nine different services

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to COs to design, implement and evaluate SDG Integration initiatives
Description as recordedNine rows carry this same name. The distinguishing content sits in the description field, where it appears as SDG Push pilot Initiative, Support for the development of National Human Development Report, Programme based budgeting support, Support for the development of the country portfolio, Support on the project Anticipate and Prevent Governance of lithium, Support to review the Iniciativa 6145 Ley Orgánica de Planificación República de Guatemala, Development of a Potential Action Plan On UNDP support to Aruba, and two rows with no description at all.
Rows in the base9 rows (IDs 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 2120, 2121, 2123, 2124)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name does not describe a service, it describes a mandate. Nothing in it allows a reader to know what was delivered, to whom, or when it ended. Each row is in fact a different action, with a different recipient and a different deliverable. The name must carry the substance and the description must state what was left installed.
Regla o criterioRegla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción, y unidad de propósito
PROPOSED RECORD A · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance to country offices for the design and evaluation of SDG Push pilot initiatives
DescriptionAccompaniment to the country offices piloting SDG Push in the design of the pilot and in the assessment of its results. The action leaves a designed pilot and an assessment per participating office.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionPeru
RecipientCountry offices piloting SDG Push
Result or deliverableSDG Push pilots designed and assessed in the participating country offices
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectSDG Push Pilot Initiative
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD B · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance to country offices for the preparation of National Human Development Reports
DescriptionSubstantive accompaniment and regional quality assurance to the country offices preparing their National Human Development Report. The action leaves a published report.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionChile
RecipientCountry offices preparing National Human Development Reports
Result or deliverableNational Human Development Report published with regional quality assurance
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
PROPOSED RECORD C · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance to the Guatemala country office for the review of the draft Organic Planning Law
DescriptionTechnical review of Initiative 6145 on the Organic Planning Law, delivered to the country office and to the national planning institutions. The action leaves a written technical opinion.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionGuatemala
RecipientCountry office and national planning institutions
Result or deliverableTechnical review of Initiative 6145 delivered
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workGovernance
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
NOTA PARA EL AGENTE
Los seis servicios restantes que compartían este nombre se registran con la misma lógica, uno por destinatario y resultado. El agente debe reconocer que un nombre repetido con descripciones distintas es señal de que hay tantas acciones como descripciones.
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 112, 113 y 2123. Dashboard 3.0 acciones A-1506, A-1507 y A-1508.

Ejemplo 3 · Country duplication of an analytical service

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action namePower of Data in LAC
Description as recordedPower of Data
Rows in the base5 rows, one per country (IDs 2620, 2623 to 2626)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe description repeats the name and adds nothing. The five rows correspond to five country offices receiving the same analytical service. One action, with the countries as scope and a description that states what the analyses contain.
Regla o criterioRegla 2. El país no divide la acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionProduction of the Power of Data analyses for country offices
DescriptionPreparation and delivery of the Power of Data analyses to the requesting country offices and their national counterparts, covering the use of new data sources for development decision making. The action leaves a delivered analysis per country.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionColombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Paraguay, Uruguay
RecipientCountry offices and national counterparts using the analyses
Result or deliverableData analyses delivered to the five country offices
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectPower of Data
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2620, 2623, 2624, 2625 y 2626. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1495.

Ejemplo 4 · Telegraphic name with no verb and no result

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSDGs – NDCs
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base4 rows, one per country (IDs 2750, 2886, 2887, 2888)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name is a pair of acronyms. It does not say what service was provided, who received it, or what was left installed. A reader outside the team cannot classify it. The action must be named with an action noun and completed with a recipient and a deliverable.
Regla o criterioUmbral de materialidad y unidad de propósito
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance for the alignment of SDGs and Nationally Determined Contributions
DescriptionSupport to planning and climate institutions for the analysis of the alignment between the national SDG framework and the Nationally Determined Contributions. The action leaves an alignment analysis adopted by the counterpart.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionColombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala
RecipientPlanning and climate institutions
Result or deliverableAlignment analysis delivered and adopted by the counterparts
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workEnvironment Team
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2750, 2886, 2887 y 2888. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1503.

Ejemplo 5 · Concept recorded as an action

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameAcceleration pathways
Description as recordedExploring next steps for acceptance pathways
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2748)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name is a concept and the description announces an exploration. Neither states a service or a closing point. If the work produced an approach that country offices can use, that is what should be recorded. If it did not, this is an internal reflection and it is not an action.
Regla o criterioRegla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDevelopment of the acceleration pathways approach for SDG integration
DescriptionDefinition of the acceleration pathways approach and of the next steps agreed with the country offices and the national planning institutions that will apply it. The action leaves a defined approach with an agreed roadmap.
Service typeStrategic thinking and thought leadership (F01)
Country, countries or regionAruba
RecipientCountry offices and national planning institutions
Result or deliverableAcceleration pathways defined with next steps agreed
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2748. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1487.

Ejemplo 6 · Tool named instead of the service delivered

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSDG Rapid Assessment tools
Description as recordedapplication of new integration tools
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2621)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record names an instrument. What the team did was to apply that instrument in a country office. The action is the application and its result is the completed assessment.
Regla o criterioUnidad de propósito
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionApplication of the SDG rapid assessment tools
DescriptionApplication of the rapid assessment tools with the participating country office to establish a baseline for SDG integration. The action leaves the completed assessment in the hands of the office.
Service typeResearch, data and knowledge products (F02)
Country, countries or regionCuraçao
RecipientCountry offices applying the assessment tools
Result or deliverableRapid assessments completed
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2621. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1490.

Ejemplo 7 · Two services in one record, development and launch

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameDevelopment and launch of SDG Integration Strategy for LAC
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 111)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaFormulating a regional strategy and launching it publicly are two different service types, strategic thinking on one side and advocacy and visibility on the other. When the launch is a single event within the same process it can stay as a milestone. When it involves its own communication products and audiences it becomes a second action. This record is kept as one because the launch had no separate product, and the criterion is made explicit in the description.
Regla o criterioRegla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionFormulation and launch of the SDG Integration Strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean
DescriptionFormulation of the regional SDG Integration Strategy and its public launch. The launch is recorded as a milestone of this action because it did not generate communication products of its own. The action leaves an approved and publicly available strategy.
Service typeStrategic thinking and thought leadership (F01)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientUNDP LAC region
Result or deliverableSDG Integration Strategy approved and publicly launched
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 111. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1488.

Ejemplo 8 · Support to a person recorded without a deliverable

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameSupport to the Regional Director on UN and Global Summits
Description as recordedProvide advise and technical support to the Regional Director on matters related to the Summit of the Future, G20, APEC, SIDS, COP, among others.
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2617)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaRecurring advisory to a director could read as a permanent function. It qualifies as an action because it can be bounded by reporting period and because the technical inputs prepared for each summit process are identifiable products. The name is kept and the description is what makes the deliverable visible.
Regla o criterioUnidad de propósito y unidad de tiempo
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionStrategic advisory to the Regional Director for UN and global summits
DescriptionPreparation of technical inputs and strategic advice for the participation of the Regional Director in the Summit of the Future, the G20, APEC, the SIDS conference and the COP processes during the reporting period. The action leaves a set of delivered inputs per process.
Service typeStrategic thinking and thought leadership (F01)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientRBLAC Regional Director
Result or deliverableTechnical inputs delivered for the Summit of the Future, G20, APEC, SIDS and COP processes
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusOngoing
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2617. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1489.

Ejemplo 9 · Partnership recorded as work with a partner

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameWork with CAF on SDG Integration and Capacity Building around the 2030 Agenda
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 117)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaWorking with a partner is not in itself a service. What was delivered here was a training programme built with CAF. The action is the training and the partner belongs in the fields of partner type and partner name.
Regla o criterioUnidad de servicio
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of a capacity building programme with CAF on SDG integration and the 2030 Agenda
DescriptionDesign and delivery of a training programme on SDG integration and the 2030 Agenda for CAF staff and country counterparts, developed jointly with CAF. The action leaves a completed programme with certified participants.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientCAF staff and country counterparts
Result or deliverableTraining programme delivered with certified participants
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectUNDP CAF partnership
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 117. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1511.

Ejemplo 10 · Description that repeats the name

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameCapacity Building on Administration and Public Policy
Description as recordedCapacity Building on Administration and Public Policy
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2619)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe description repeats the name word for word. Forty two per cent of the base has no description at all and a repeated description is equivalent to an empty one. The description must state what was done and what was left installed, and it is where the recipient and the closing point become visible.
Regla o criterioCampo de descripción obligatorio
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionDelivery of capacity building on public administration and public policy
DescriptionDelivery of a capacity building programme for public officials on public administration and public policy, within the cooperation with the national government. The action leaves a completed programme with a trained group of officials.
Service typeCapacity development and training (F05)
Country, countries or regionCuba
RecipientPublic officials
Result or deliverableCapacity building delivered with trained participants
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2619. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1512.

Ejemplo 11 · Pilot recorded twice for the same country

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action namePilot of new integration tools
Description as recordedPilot of new integration tools in Aruba
Rows in the base2 rows (IDs 2618 and 2622)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe same pilot was entered twice with small differences in wording. Under rule 6 an action that continues across periods keeps its identifier and is updated through the status field, it is not entered again. The two rows become one action covering the two territories where the tools were piloted.
Regla o criterioRegla 2 y regla 6. Continuidad entre períodos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionPiloting of the new SDG integration tools
DescriptionPiloting of the new SDG integration tools with the participating country offices, including the documentation of the results of each pilot. The action leaves tested tools with a documented record of their performance.
Service typeInnovation and digital transformation (F08)
Country, countries or regionAruba, Trinidad and Tobago
RecipientParticipating country offices
Result or deliverableTools piloted with documented results
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 IDs 2618 y 2622. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1514.

Ejemplo 12 · Record with no recipient and no scope

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameProvide support to update the National Development Strategy and the National Multi-Year Plan
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 2749)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe record does not say which country, which institution or what was delivered. Support is not a service type, it is a way of describing availability. The action must name the technical assistance provided, the planning institution that received it and the instrument that was produced.
Regla o criterioUnidad de destinatario
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionTechnical assistance for the update of the National Development Strategy and the multi year plan
DescriptionTechnical accompaniment to the national planning institutions in the update of the National Development Strategy and of the associated multi year plan. The action leaves both updated instruments delivered to the counterpart.
Service typePolicy advice and technical assistance (F04)
Country, countries or regionDominican Republic
RecipientPlanning institutions
Result or deliverableUpdated national strategy and multi year plan delivered
OriginDemand
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 2749. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1505.

Ejemplo 13 · Record already well formulated

CURRENT RECORD · Dashboard 2.0
Action nameMapping and systematizing regional and global tools on SDG integration collection.
Description as recordedSin dato
Rows in the base1 row (ID 109)
DIAGNOSIS
Qué fallaThe name identifies a single service type, a verifiable product and an implicit recipient. It only needs a description and the completion of the mandatory fields. This is the level of formulation the agent should aim for.
Regla o criterioCumple los cinco atributos
PROPOSED RECORD · Dashboard 3.0
ActionMapping and systematization of regional and global SDG integration tools into a consolidated repository for country offices
DescriptionIdentification and systematization of the regional and global tools available for SDG integration and their consolidation into a single repository accessible to country offices and regional teams. The action leaves an available repository.
Service typeKnowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation (F06)
Country, countries or regionLatin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
RecipientLAC country offices and regional teams
Result or deliverableRepository of mapped SDG integration tools available to country offices
OriginSupply
Lead teamSDG Integration
Focal point[Team focal point]
Integrated workWithout integrated work
Parent projectNo aplica
StatusClosed
TrazabilidadDashboard 2.0 ID 109. Dashboard 3.0 acción A-1513.

7. Observaciones sobre el formulario

Al construir las fichas aparecieron cuatro puntos que conviene resolver antes de abrir la carga del nuevo ciclo.

  • La lista del campo Lead team tiene seis valores y los equipos que cargaron información en el ciclo anterior son ocho. Faltan SDG & Policy y SDG Integration, y el equipo de ambiente aparece en la base como LAC Environment Team. Conviene fijar la lista con los ocho nombres y usar el mismo texto en el campo Integrated work.
  • El campo Period aparece en la definición de campos con el valor TBD. Sin ese campo resuelto, los equipos seguirán escribiendo el año dentro del nombre de la acción, como ocurre en varios registros del equipo de VIH y salud.
  • El campo Recipient está definido como texto libre. Dado que es el atributo que sustituye a la duplicación por país, conviene acompañarlo de una lista sugerida de tipos de destinatario, por ejemplo oficina de país, institución nacional, gobierno subnacional, organización de la sociedad civil o audiencia regional, y dejar el texto libre para el nombre propio.
  • El campo Funding type contiene dos entradas equivalentes, Cost Sharing y Cost sharing, que el sistema tratará como categorías distintas. Conviene unificarlas antes de abrir la carga.

8. Fuentes

  • PNUD SIGOB. Definición de acción para el Dashboard Regional 3.0. Componente 1, Producto 1.
  • Dashboard3.0. Acciones del Dashboard 2.0 reescritas según la definición de acción. Matriz de 1.958 registros y 1.514 acciones consolidadas.
  • Campos BD Dashboard 3.0. Definición de campos, listas de valores y campos obligatorios.
  • Consolidado de actividades del Dashboard 2022 a 2025, base de origen del Dashboard 2.0.

RBLAC Regional Programme

United Nations DP/RPD/RLA/5

Executive Board of the United Nations Development

Programme, the United Nations Population Fund and the United Nations Office for Project Services

Distr.: General 24 June 2025

Original: English

Second regular session 2025

25 to 28 August 2025, New York Item 16 of the provisional agenda

Regional programme documents, 2026-2029

Regional programme document for Latin America and the Caribbean (2026-2029)

Contents

ChapterPage
I.Programme rationale………………………………………………………………………………………..2
II.Programme priorities and partnerships………………………………………………….……….…6
III.Programme and risk management ……………………………………………….…………………11
IV.Monitoring and evaluation …………………………………………………….……………………12
Annex
Results and resources framework for the regional programme for Latin America and the Caribbean (2026-2029)13

1

  1. Programme rationale
    1. The regional programme for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2026-2029, is aligned with the goals, objectives and accelerators of the UNDP Strategic Plan, 2026-2029. It is based on the premise that the region holds unique potential for sustainable development that can only be unleashed by placing resilience1 at the centre of the development agenda.
    2. Global economic volatility, geopolitical tensions and accelerating technological and social change converge in Latin America and the Caribbean with deeply rooted structural vulnerabilities, elevated levels of uncertainty and exposure to more frequent, intense and interconnected shocks. These factors – compounded by governance challenges and insufficient institutional capacity– are undermining the region’s development trajectory.
    3. Placing resilience – as promoter of agency, protector of development gains and the path forward for progress – at the centre of this regional programme proactively addresses structural vulnerabilities, while equipping individuals, communities and institutions with coping mechanisms to manage immediate challenges, unlock the region’s potential and ensure it is better prepared to withstand and rebound from shocks.
    4. Over the previous decades, Latin America and the Caribbean achieved significant progress in human development, poverty reduction, democratic consolidation and economic growth. Between 2000 and 2024, it halved poverty levels – from 50.3 to 25 per cent2 – reduced child mortality by half,3 and cut school exclusion from one in four children to one in ten.4 Life expectancy increased by over six years,5 reflecting improved healthcare. Electoral systems, citizen participation and women’s political representation6 also advanced. As living conditions improved, economies expanded – making the region largely middle-income, though not quite middle class.
    5. Progress has been unequal and began to stall even before the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Persistent structural challenges and certain characteristics of its development trajectory make the region vulnerable to shocks, threatening past gains and impeding further progress. The pandemic exemplified this – while global, it hit Latin America and the Caribbean the hardest, with the highest mortality rates, steepest recession and most severe setbacks in human development. These setbacks have made individuals and communities feel fragile and less optimistic about the future.
    6. Latin America and the Caribbean is characterized by slow and volatile growth that is highly dependent on external conditions. In 2024, the region experienced a moderate growth rate of
    2.2 per cent of gross domestic product, 1.1 percentage points below the world average and the lowest among developing regions.7 The region’s sluggish economic growth is largely attributed to stagnant productivity, which has remained relatively unchanged for the past 50 years. Compounding these challenges is the prevalence of a large informal sector that employs about half of the region’s workers.

1 The regional programme conceptualizes “resilience” from a human development perspective, with the aim to enable people to enjoy valuable lives in terms of capability and agency so that the impact of critical pervasive shocks on their lives is prevented or mitigated, while people and communities, especially the most disadvantaged, can shape their lives and, if adversity strikes, rebound and flourish again.
2 World Bank (2023), Poverty and Inequality Platform: Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://povertydata.worldbank.org.
3 United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (2023), Levels and Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2023. UNICEF. Retrieved from https://childmortality.org.

4 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Institute for Statistics (2023). Education and literacy. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org
5 World Bank (2023). Life expectancy at birth, total (years) – Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN.
6 Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). (2023). Global data on national parliaments. IPU Parline. Retrieved from https://data.ipu.org.
7 World Bank (2025). “Global Economic Prospects, January 2025.”

  1. The growing debt burden has further constrained fiscal space. The recent economic contraction, coupled with rising global interest rates and currency depreciation, has exacerbated debt vulnerabilities. Several countries now allocate a prominent share of their budgets to debt servicing, diverting resources away from areas such as health, education and infrastructure. This is further accentuated in the Caribbean, where recovery costs from extreme weather events generate a vicious cycle of fiscal needs and high interest rates. Growing debt pressures underscore the need for more sustainable financing strategies.
    1. Latin America and the Caribbean continues to face challenges related to weak institutional capacity, which undermine effective governance. Institutions struggle with limited resources, low levels of coordination and excessive bureaucracy that hamper policy action and service delivery. Corruption, political polarization and frequent leadership changes further erode public trust.
    2. Frustration and discontent with systems that fail to adequately meet citizens’ needs deepen social fragmentation and obstruct constructive public discourse.8 Political polarization limits consensus building and cooperation – and coupled with uncertainty and more frequent adverse events – erodes agency and effective freedoms, exposing the region to divisive narratives and growing violence and criminal activity.9 But dissatisfaction can also provide energy for transformation, as part of a process of social change which, if managed adequately, can lead to positive transformations and improved social cohesion.
    3. Rapidly evolving technologies – including artificial intelligence – are reshaping fundamental aspects of daily life, while fuelling misinformation, cyberattacks and political violence. Although the uneven adoption of new technologies exacerbates preexisting inequalities, the region can still steer this technological disruption to boost human capabilities, agency and resilience. To do so, the region needs to invest in human capital, digital infrastructure, responsible data governance and robust digital ecosystems.
    4. The increasing frequency and intensity of climate-related hazards is impacting the region. Over the past two decades, Latin America and the Caribbean experienced more than twice the annual average number of extreme events10 than in previous decades. These events impact women and vulnerable groups disproportionately. As a biodiversity superpower with a significant proportion of its economies depending on climate-sensitive activities, such as agriculture and tourism, the region’s natural capital offers unique sustainable economic opportunities, including the possibility to expand human capabilities.
    5. Crises of diverse nature also impact health outcomes in the region, which despite some progress, still face significant challenges. Mental health is a growing concern, particularly among youth, costing the region over $30 billion annually in lost productivity and early mortality.11 Awareness and prioritization of mental health are rising, with social policies increasingly recognizing mental well-being as integral to human development.
    6. Care services can act as a significant buffer to support households’ ability to generate income in times of shocks. But they remain highly undervalued. Unpaid care work represents about
    21.4 per cent of the region’s gross domestic product and could amount to 21 cents for every dollar generated.12 Care duties, mostly carried out by women, reinforce gender inequality and constrain women’s economic empowerment. Many countries in the region are advancing care policies that aim to recognize, redistribute and reward care work. Enhancing care systems can greatly boost

8 UNDP (2025). Regional Human Development Report – Under Pressure: Recalibrating the Future of Development in Latin America and the Caribbean.
9 Latinobarómetro (2023). Informe 2023: La democracia en América Latina. Fundación Latinobarómetro. https://www.latinobarometro.org
10 Additional information on EM-DAT (The International Disaster Database) is available at www.emdat.be.

11 UNDP (2025). Regional Human Development Report – Under Pressure: Recalibrating the Future of Development in Latin America and the Caribbean.
12 UNDP, 2024. The Missing Piece: Valuing women’s unrecognized contribution to the economy https://www.undp.org/latin-america/blog/missing-piece-valuing-womens-unrecognized-contribution-economy

economic resilience and wellbeing – especially with the number of older adults rising to 1 in 6 people by 2030.13

  1. Tackling these interconnected challenges requires integrated, system-level approaches capable of managing complex risks simultaneously. By embedding resilience at the core of development agendas, such strategies not only mitigate the impact of shocks but also create opportunities to accelerate progress and open a way forward for development in the region.
    1. The regional programme – anchored on countries’ priorities and national ownership – will be the foundation to bring innovative, evidence-based, context-specific policy solutions and technical support to local counterparts. Through multidimensional strategies and regional cooperation platforms, the programme will mobilize strategic partnerships, catalyse private and public resources and foster knowledge-sharing to drive transformative outcomes that align regional cooperation and financial resources with national and territorial development priorities. Strengthening resilience, expanding agency and fostering shared prosperity within planetary boundaries will be central to these efforts.
    2. The regional programme draws on: (a) a synthesis of development challenges in the region;
    (b) lessons and recommendations from evaluations of the regional programme, 2022-2025, and its projects; (c) a review of UNDP country programme documents; (d) analysis of regional and country consultations for the Strategic Plan, 2026-2029; (e) inputs from consultations with UNDP country offices and regional partners informing the programmatic vision and strategic knowledge products of the Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean; and (f) programmatic learning from previous regional cycles.
    1. Over the past four years, the regional programme prioritized four outcomes: (a) inclusive and sustainable growth, emphasizing small and medium-size enterprises’ (SMEs) productivity, decent jobs and sustainable finance; (b) equity through stronger social protection and care systems to reduce inequalities and enhance shock resilience, alongside multidimensional poverty analysis and policy; (c) resilient, sustainable development and green recovery, with gender-responsive, risk-informed policies and financing for climate action, biodiversity and disaster risk reduction; and
    (d) effective governance, reinforcing inclusive, accountable systems to boost civic engagement, uphold the rule of law, improve citizen security and access to justice, and promote evidence-based policymaking.
    1. During the 2022-2025 cycle, progress was achieved across these four areas, demonstrating the programme’s concrete impact. UNDP advanced sustainable finance with innovations such as the sovereign sustainability-linked bond tied to greenhouse gas emissions and land-conservation targets. It also strengthened social protection through unified beneficiary systems, multidimensional targeting and interoperable databases. The expansion of the gender equality seal to public and private sectors, improving pay equity and anti-harassment policies. The Spotlight Initiative enhanced civil society organizations’ advocacy efforts and contributed to new legislation on violence against women and girls. Digital transformation delivered gains in governance – using the SIGOBito 2.0 methodology14 to reduce municipal processing times and allowing citizens to track mayoral commitments. Infosegura15 and CariSECURE16 strengthened citizen security in Central America, the Dominican Republic and the English-speaking Caribbean. In April 2024, UNDP launched the Digital 4 Development Hub17 in Latin America and the Caribbean to accelerate digital transformation in the region.

13 Pan-American Health Organization available at https://www.paho.org/en/healthy-aging-data-and-visualizations

14 Additional information on SIGOBito is available at www.sigob.org/sigobito.

15 Additional information on Infosegura is available at www.undp.org/latin-america/infosegura.
16 Additional information on CariSECURE is available at www.undp.org/latin-america/carisecure.
17 Additional information on the Digital for Development Hub is available at www.undp.org/latin-america/digitalhub4.

  1. Despite notable successes, the programme cycle encountered challenges that slowed progress and restricted reach: (a) the economic contraction due to COVID-19 negatively impacted critical sectors such as tourism, with lasting impact on fiscal stability, employment, education and social protection; (b) political volatility hindered effective governance and policy continuity, underscoring the fragility of gains without cross-party consensus or statutory budgets; and (c) constrained regional financial and human resources limited engagement in crucial sectors such as disaster risk reduction, climate and energy.
    1. Nonetheless, UNDP remains strategically positioned to drive transformative changes, thanks to the following critical strengths: (a) extensive country presence, as the development partner with the largest footprint in the region; (b) longstanding and robust partnerships with governments; (c) high stakeholder trust; (d) a global network of technical expertise allowing timely, coherent, cutting-edge policy advice and knowledge exchange; (e) proven track record spanning six decades as a transparent and reliable development partner; and (f) a holistic development mandate.
    2. Building on its comparative advantage, UNDP will:
      1. (i) advance thought leadership; (ii) respond to national and local demands for policy advice and strengthened capacities; (iv) create an enabling environment for larger investments in development; and (iv) offer its convening power, strong presence and partnerships to serve as the regional platform for resilient human development, where different levels of government,, development banks, economic actors, multilateral institutions and multiple ecosystems come together to advance human development within planetary boundaries;
      2. work closely with local governments and decentralized cooperation agencies to build resilience at the territorial level – by supporting local governance structures in developing and implementing context-specific resilience strategies that address unique environmental, social and economic vulnerabilities;
      3. foster collaboration with other regions – including the European Union and its Global Gateway approach, bilateral donors, such as the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID), and multilateral organizations, including the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), to bridge financing and development needs;
      4. bring together actors to institutionalize tax, budget and debt frameworks aligned with development objectives and scale work on financial instruments – including sustainability-linked bonds, Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) bonds, and emerging nature-performance bonds across Caribbean small island developing States (SIDS). UNDP will play an active role in blended finance packages with the private sector, regional institutions, including the Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean (CAF), the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the Central American Bank for Economic Integration (CABEI) and the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB), and multilateral and bilateral banks such as the European Investment Bank (EIB), the Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW), the Agence Française de Développement (AFD), the World Bank and others;
      5. prioritize private sector actors – ranging from micro, small and medium-size enterprises (MSMEs) to multinational corporations – and promote enabling conditions and policy de-risking measures to unlock private and public finance towards development objectives. To do so, it will work with different levels of government and partners in the region on leveraging its large portfolio of vertical fund projects and flagship programmes, such as the Climate Promise, towards the promotion of sustainable value chains and the generation of market transformation opportunities. Existing partnerships with development banks, financial institutions and private sector companies such as AFD, the Fondo para el
      Financiamiento del Sector Agropecuario (FINAGRO), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), CAF, BanEcuador, Lavazza, Silvacaco, Toyota and Mabe will be further consolidated;
      1. build on its vast expertise in governance to bring together regulators, treasuries, parliamentary commissions and private sector actors to support policy and financial alignment in key development sectors. It will build on existing work in sustainable finance taxonomies and budget tracking methodologies; and
      2. strengthen effective governance as a fundamental pillar of resilience and human development within planetary boundaries, supporting national stakeholders through electoral assistance, economic governance, strengthening of subnational governments, public integrity measures, the reduction of toxic polarization, women´s political participation and a broader civic space.
    3. A reduction in multilateral partner presence and resources available to finance development in the region reinforces the relevance of the regional programme´s proposed approach: to offer the UNDP competitive advantage in the region as a platform for development cooperation to respond to national demands through context-specific, coherent policy choices; facilitate collaboration and knowledge exchange among countries; and catalyse development finance, placing resilient human development in harmony with the planet at its core.
  2. Programme priorities and partnerships
  3. The regional programme aims to advance human development on a healthy planet while navigating an uncertain and increasingly complex landscape in Latin America and the Caribbean. It aims to achieve this by strengthening resilience, acknowledging that focusing solely on development progress is insufficient in the face of stalled development progress and recurring shocks. The regional programme is grounded in the premise that resilient human development is the new frontier in unlocking the region’s economic and social development potential within planetary boundaries.
  4. From a systems perspective, the regional programme recognizes that progress in resilience, governance, prosperity and environmental sustainability depends not only on targeted actions in each area, but also on how key accelerators – gender equality, digital transformation and sustainable finance – interact across them. These accelerators are not standalone efforts but fundamental drivers shaping interconnected development pathways. To catalyse transformative change, the programme promotes interventions that strengthen these accelerators and embed them into the design, implementation and outcomes of broader systemic shifts.
  5. The regional programme will work with countries to expand opportunities for youth, women and girls by helping to remove structural barriers and strengthen women’s participation. Through its Latin America and the Caribbean Facility for Financing Resilient Human Development, UNDP will support national and subnational actors to enhance regulatory, institutional and policy frameworks to better align public and private investments with national sustainable development objectives. In the digital space, the programme will contribute to building digital ecosystems by boosting institutional capacities and expanding access to digital infrastructure and services.
  6. The regional programme connects knowledge and action across sectors by revitalizing expert networks and using UNDP convening power to bring together diverse actors. It offers a platform to rebuild trust, coherence and collective narratives. The programme advances its priorities through targeted, integrated initiatives at the regional, multi-country and subregional levels, co-designed with partners; through dedicated and decentralized advisory services; and by providing a space for countries to tackle shared challenges, access joint solutions and benefit from cross-country learning.
  7. Through risk-informed governance, the programme focuses on strengthening countries’ capacity to prevent, anticipate, absorb and adapt to evolving risks. It learns from the Caribbean experience, where SIDS face disproportionate exposure to climate, economic and security-related shocks. Outcome 1. Resilience as a path forward for development in Latin America and the Caribbean (Strategic Plan outcome: crisis resilience)
  8. The regional programme will work with countries to elaborate strategies that place resilience at their core, recognizing that development progress needs to be advanced as well as protected. This involves promoting preventive, anticipatory and risk-informed governance that enables coordinated action across typically siloed sectors and government levels. A key focus will be designing social protection systems that endow households with coping mechanisms, while reducing impacts and supporting response and recovery efforts. Support could include the use of portfolio approaches and participatory dialogues, as well as investments in digital public infrastructure (data, registries) and early warning systems. Regional cooperation and knowledge exchange will be vital for leveraging synergies and innovations.
  9. The programme will work with countries to test and scale innovative tools that protect development gains and accelerate recovery with a multidimensional approach. This includes supporting risk-informed planning, foresight and scenario analysis, promoting resilient infrastructure and services and investing in adaptive capacities, with an emphasis on human security and agency. The programme will foster coalitions of governments, civil society organizations, international partners, academia, the private sector and United Nations entities to shape resilient recovery pathways. Their distinct impact on youth, women, girls and vulnerable groups will inform these efforts. Recovery will be treated not as a return to a previous state, but as an opportunity to tackle root causes, lower future risks and support equitable transitions.
  10. The programme will leverage key accelerators – digital transformation, gender equality and sustainable finance – to strengthen resilience. This includes advancing digital public infrastructure for early warning, anticipatory action and agile service delivery; supporting countries in accessing financial mechanisms (grants, loans, loss and damage funds) and scaling up risk-sharing tools (for example, insurance) to attract private capital; and promoting regional collaboration to expand financial protection instruments. These enablers will be embedded in both prevention and response efforts. Outcome 2. Effective governance for inclusive, resilient and people-centred development (Strategic Plan outcome: effective governance)
  11. The regional programme will work with countries to strengthen institutions to deliver more inclusive, anticipatory and resilient governance – capable of navigating complexity, rebuilding trust, renewing social contracts and expanding development opportunities. A key focus will be on enabling institutions to move beyond silos towards integrated solutions that improve coordination, transparency, citizen engagement and service delivery. Support for digital transformation and the ethical use of artificial intelligence will remain central, along with parliamentary development, foresight and strengthening local governance.
  12. As governance systems face growing stressors, UNDP will work with countries to strengthen state capacities to anticipate, prevent and respond to emerging threats – such as violence, organized crime, cyberattacks, political disruption and social unrest. Since these risks often cross institutional boundaries, the programme will promote collaboration across sectors. Support will include access to justice, people-centred approaches to citizen security and expanding rights and services through digital transformation.
  13. As the region advances energy transitions and as resource-intensive sectors such as mining, agriculture, fisheries and forestry grow in importance, the regional programme will support governance that fosters land-use planning, social dialogue and consensus building. It will promote economic strategies that uphold the rights of local communities, including Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendants and rural populations. Regional platforms will enable dialogue on responsible resource governance and environmental justice, facilitating the alignment between competitiveness, social cohesion and sustainability.
  14. To promote effective governance and an inclusive public sphere, the programme will invest in electoral integrity, citizen participation and the leadership of women and youth. Amid rising polarization, governance must rebuild institutional trust and empower citizens to shape their futures. The programme will support open, inclusive decision-making and foster national dialogues at all levels. It will work with countries to strengthen governance responses to human mobility and forced displacement, encouraging cooperation and institutional adaptation. In partnership with United Nations organizations, the European Union, and international cooperation and development banks, the programme will mobilize expertise and financing to enhance governance systems that deliver better services, peace, inclusive prosperity and resilience. Outcome 3. Healthy planet for sustainable, inclusive and resilient human development (Strategic Plan outcome: healthy planet)
  15. The regional programme will work with countries to transform strategies, policies, institutions and financial systems to better align with climate and nature goals. It will promote policy coherence across sectors and levels by working with countries in achieving their international environmental commitments, including their nationally determined contributions and national biodiversity strategies and action plans, while prioritizing national ownership and context-specific pathways, fostering sustainable growth, equality and social cohesion.
  16. The programme will facilitate dialogue and cooperation on complex trade-offs – such as water, energy transitions and critical mineral extraction – ensuring that economic transformation strategies are inclusive and uphold the rights and participation of Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendants and local communities.
  17. Building on the region’s leadership in environmental and energy action, the regional programme will work with countries to enable investment ecosystems for sustainable development. This includes mobilizing and aligning public and private finance through environment-based instruments and blended finance approaches that link climate action with local economic opportunity and resilience. The programme will also offer technical support to strengthen digital infrastructure – such as geospatial tools, risk data platforms and early warning systems. Outcome 4. Prosperity for all – inclusive economic opportunity and resilient pathways (Strategic Plan outcome: prosperity for all)
  18. The regional programme will focus on enhancing productivity and reducing vulnerability – two interconnected goals. It will work with countries on job creation, productivity and access to skills and assets, especially for youth and those furthest behind. It will foster local economic development and improve the MSME ecosystem through interventions that enhance digital skills, promote entrepreneurship and use artificial intelligence for productivity. It will also promote dialogue among finance, planning, labour and social ministries to co-design policies that build resilience to future shocks while enabling inclusive growth aligned with emerging market opportunities.
  19. The programme will work with national, subnational and local governments to reduce both monetary and multidimensional poverty, while reducing vulnerability and contributing towards consolidating a stable middle class. It will strengthen social protection, health and care systems, alongside policies and market mechanisms that ensure access to quality and affordable services and support the accumulation of assets. Through the UNDP Poverty Hub and evidence-based policymaking tools, the programme will collaborate with decision makers to implement innovative instruments that improve the efficiency of public spending. Emphasis will be placed on adaptive social protection, comprehensive care systems and asset-building tools – such as savings, insurance, credit and physical assets – that enhance household resilience to shocks. Regional knowledge platforms will support exchange on innovative, shock-responsive social protection models and multidimensional poverty analysis, including those integrating care systems and promoting rights-based approaches.
  20. The programme will work with countries in expanding fiscal space through inclusive frameworks, progressive taxation, budgeting aligned to national sustainable development objectives and results-based policies that improve public investment efficiency. It will promote alignment between development plans and financing strategies by using integrated national financing frameworks to combine public and private finance. Support will also include capacity-building in progressive taxation, development financing and innovative tools linking climate, digital and social investments. The overall goal is to assist countries in financing development with resilience at the core.
  21. The programme will deepen cooperation and strategic partnerships to scale solutions and optimize resources. UNDP will work with regional partner countries and the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC), the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation and the European Union, and align with the Global Gateway and fragility streams. The programme will also continue to work closely with AECID, which has been a decades-long partner to UNDP in Latin America and the Caribbean in advancing human development and democratic governance.
  22. With Latin America and the Caribbean countries increasingly acting as non-traditional donors, funding their own development and contributing to regional cooperation, the regional programme will offer a platform for co-designing and implementing solutions for resilient human development in harmony with the planet. It will also expand engagement with regional organizations such as the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR), the Organization of American States (OAS) System for Central American Integration (SICA), and the Ibero-American General Secretariat (SEGIB) to strengthen regional and subregional strategies, enhance policy coherence and address transboundary challenges.
  23. UNDP will act as a decentralized and integrated regional response platform for South-South and triangular cooperation and collaboration among United Nations organizations. As co-vice chair of the United Nations Regional Collaborative Platform for Latin America and the Caribbean, alongside the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), UNDP will help steer integrated regional support to accelerate sustainable development at the subregional and cross-border levels in line with national priorities. UNDP will continue to co-lead the coordination mechanisms under thematic areas inherent to its mandate. Regional collaboration with United Nations entities will be strengthened through its regional networked presence to enhance synergies with key organizations, including ECLAC, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the International Labour Organization (ILO), the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN-Women), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). UNDP will continue to serve as the backbone of the United Nations development systems, leveraging its regional presence, expertise and partnerships in support of programme countries and the broader United Nations system.
  24. In alignment with the Addis Ababa Action Agenda and the specific needs of middle-income countries, the regional programme will promote development finance mobilization through partnerships with international financial institutions and national development banks. These include the European Investment Bank (EIB), the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB), IDB, CAF, the World Bank, CABEI, the Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (BNDES), the Nacional Financiera (Nafin), the Banco de Desarrollo y Exportaciones (BANDEX), the Banco República, the Agency for Development Finance of Paraguay and the Productive Development Bank of Bolivia. These collaborations will support priority investments, mobilize private capital for public goods and implement impact measurement systems to drive sustainable development and climate finance.
  25. The programme will intensify engagement with the private sector, chambers of commerce, foundations and local economic development agencies to promote inclusive business models, circular economy initiatives, responsible technology use and sustainable investment – enhancing the private sector’s contribution to regional and national SDG priorities.
  26. Recognizing the role of non-state actors, the programme will broaden partnerships with civil society networks, think tanks, academia and community groups to foster civic participation, accountability and innovation. Youth networks, women’s organizations and environmental advocates will be prioritized to ensure diverse perspectives inform regional programming and policy dialogue.
  27. The programme will leverage: (a) flagship knowledge products such as the Regional Human Development Report and the Democracy and Development Report; (b) high-level forums such as the Ministerial Forum for Development (co-organized with ECLAC); and (c) dialogue platforms such as Reimagining Our Future: Dialogues about Development in Latin America and the Caribbean.
  28. Programme and risk management
  29. This regional programme outlines UNDP contributions to regional results and serves as the primary accountability mechanism to the Executive Board for results alignment and resources assigned to the programme. The accountabilities of managers at the country, regional and headquarters levels with respect to regional programmes are prescribed in the organization’s programme and operations policies and procedures and the internal control framework.
  30. Oversight of the regional programme lies with the Director of the Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean, with day-to-day management and monitoring delegated, under the supervision of the Deputy Director, to the Regional Hub Manager in Panama. An Advisory Board – comprising resident representatives and senior central bureau staff – will provide overall guidance, quality assurance and help validate alignment with global and country-level priorities. Project-level oversight will follow UNDP norms and include internal and external stakeholders as needed. UNDP policies and standards will guide implementation and quality assurance.
  31. The programme will be implemented in coordination with the region’s country offices, mainly through regional projects using the direct implementation modality. Regional and subregional activities will be paired with targeted country-level components as needed, planned and coordinated in annual workplans. Design will emphasize integrated, portfolio-based approaches.
  32. To meet resource needs and reduce reliance on declining core and traditional funding, the programme will engage a diversified partner base, including cost-sharing arrangements, multilateral donors and private sector partners. A resource mobilization plan will guide donor engagement, aligned with the UNITY regional pipeline. Estimated programme financing is $40.7 million – $3.2 million from regular resources and $37.5 million from other resources. In accordance with Executive Board decision 2013/9, all direct costs associated with project implementation should be charged to the concerned projects. The harmonized approach to cash transfers will help manage financial risks when involving external implementation partners.
  33. Beyond its own resource mobilization, programme implementation will contribute to expanding overall regional programme financing. The Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean mobilizes around $200 million annually – totalling roughly $800 million over the 2026–2029 cycle – most of which will be programmed at the country level and reported under country programmes, avoiding double-counting.
  34. Successful implementation depends on managing interconnected risks, including uncertainty, reduced development financing, political polarization, low trust in institutions, organized crime, slow growth, high debt, limited fiscal space, intensifying climate shocks, resource pressures and the undesired impacts of an accelerated digital transition.
  35. Risks will be monitored via early warning tools, risk logs and monitoring systems, using the UNDP enterprise risk management policy. Contingency measures include scaling down interventions when necessary and prioritizing sustainable development goals, crisis response and recovery. Adaptive management, theory of change adjustments, virtual technical assistance and greater local ownership will help maintain programme relevance and sustainability. Additional measures include fostering political dialogue, building United Nations coherence, leveraging regional frameworks and intensifying resource mobilization.
  36. All activities will be grounded in gender analysis and follow UNDP social and environmental standards, with conflict-sensitive approaches as needed. The risk log will be regularly updated using corporate tools, and all due diligence procedures will be strictly followed and monitored.
  37. Monitoring and evaluation
  38. The Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean has adopted a robust results-based management approach in the design of its resources and results framework and to ensure systematic monitoring, evaluation and learning across all programme components, in line with UNDP programme and operations policies and procedures.
  39. The regional programme’s results framework includes outcome and output indicators that:
    (a) reflect the programme’s priorities; (b) align with the UNDP Strategic Plan, 2026-2029, integrated results and resources framework, and (c) are measurable using diverse data sources to track interlinked results. Output indicators also reflect regional contributions, including beneficiary data. Progress on results and resource use will be monitored quarterly and annually through planning, budgeting and monitoring exercises. All programme activities will follow UNDP institutional processes and standards. Annual progress will be reported in the results-oriented annual report.
  40. UNDP will ensure sound monitoring and evaluation systems are supported by adequate budgets and technical guidance for results tracking and reporting.
  41. Adaptive management will be central to programme monitoring, focusing not only on tracking outcomes but also on understanding how uncertainty affects them, and adjusting strategies accordingly. Quick feedback loops and continuous learning will strengthen the programme’s adaptability and impact orientation.
  42. Data collection and analysis will be enhanced to monitor progress, support adaptive management and inform decisions. Both traditional and digital data methods will be used. The programme will allocate 15 per cent of expenditures to gender specific results and gender-sensitive, target group-focused data, which will be monitored applying the UNDP gender marker. At least 5 per cent of the programme budget – charged proportionally to projects – will be allocated to monitoring, evaluation and communication.
  43. A comprehensive evaluation plan will cover priority areas, balancing programme and project-level assessments. It will support accountability, learning and course correction.
  44. The results framework includes a multi-year policy research and knowledge management agenda, to be updated in collaboration with development partners, academia and think tanks.

Annex. Results and resources framework

Related SDG: 1, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17
REGIONAL PROGRAMME OUTCOME #1 CRISIS RESILIENCE: By 2029, institutions and people in Latin America and the Caribbean are better prepared to prevent, respond to and recover from crises while sustaining long-term development.
RELATED STRATEGIC PLAN OUTCOME 3: By 2029, institutions and people in Latin America and the Caribbean are better prepared to prevent, respond to and recover from crises while sustaining long-term development.
Outcome indicator(s), baselines, target(s)Data source and frequency of data collectionIndicative regional programme outputs (including indicators, baselines targets)Major partnersIndicative resources by outcome (United States dollars)
Number of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean that adopt and implement national disaster risk reduction strategies in line with the Sendai Framework (results and resources framework (RRF) strategic outcome (SO) 3.1) Baseline (2025): To be determined (TBD) Target (2029): TBD Number of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean whose vulnerability to crisis and disaster risk has improved (RRF SO 3.2) Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBDSDG 1.5.3 INFORM Risk Index European CommissionKey institutional actors and stakeholders, including vulnerable populations, strengthened their capacities for gender-responsive crisis prevention and risk reduction, ensuring people-centred proactive measures to mitigate crises before they escalate. Number of institutional actors and stakeholders that implement people-centred proactive measures through enhanced capacities on risk-informed planning, governance and coordination for: Disaster risk reduction and recovery; Human mobility, conflict prevention and peacebuilding; Adaptation to climate change; Inclusion of gender-responsive approach to crises and disaster risk management. Baseline (2025): 271 22 0 7 Target (2029): 379 60 4 19 Source: UNDP annual, project/initiative reportsUNDRR, OCHA CAF, IDB, Coordination Centre for the Prevention of Natural Disasters in Central America (CEPREDENAC), Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA), Latin American Network of Social Sciences in Disasters Prevention, European Commission’s Humanitarian Aid Office (ECHO), Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure, AECID, government institutionsRegular: $700,000 Other: $3,687,182
O.1.2. Inclusive innovative solutions and governance mechanisms are leveraged to enable key stakeholders, vulnerable population, and government institutions to effectively respond,
accelerate early recovery, and promote long-term resilience I.1.2.1. Number of inclusive innovative solutions that enable key stakeholders to promote long-term resilience through enhance capacities on: Disaster risks reduction, losses, damage and recovery; Human mobility, conflict prevention and peacebuilding; Adaptation to climate change; Inclusion of gender-responsive approach to crises and disaster risk management. Baseline (2025): 29 7 0 3 Target (2029): 59 20 3 7 Source: UNDP annual, project/initiative reports
Related SDG: 1, 5, 10, 16, 17
REGIONAL PROGRAMME OUTCOME #2 EFFECTOVE GOVERNANCE: By 2029, governance systems in Latin America and the Caribbean are more effective, inclusive and accountable, enabling people, societies and economies to thrive.
RELATED STRATEGIC PLAN OUTCOME 2: By 2029, governance systems are more effective, inclusive and accountable, enabling people, societies and economies to thrive.
I.2.1. Proportion of the population in Latin America and the Caribbean who believe decision-making is inclusive and responsive, by gender (RRF SO 2.1) Baseline (2025): TBDSDG 16.7.2O 2.1. Public institutions at national and subnational levels formulate people-centred policies and solutions that lead to more efficient, accessible and inclusive services, through enhanced capabilities, including for innovation and for the use of digital technologies,OIM, UNODC, ECLAC, UN-Women, UNFPA, OAS, CARICOM, SICA, SEGIB, Ibero- American Youth Organization (OIJ),Regular: $700,000
Other: $14,314,938
Target (2029): TBD I.2.2. Number of people in Latin America and the Caribbean who have access to justice (RRF G.2.2.2) Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBD I.2.3. Proportion of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean with high levels of digital maturity in public services (RR SO 2.6) Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBDTBD United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) e-government development indexexpanding development opportunities, strengthening resilience and fostering social cohesion. I.2.1.1. Number of public institutions strengthen to deliver people-centred policies and services, disaggregated by: Capacities to implement programmes, deliver services and run effective operations, including using digital solutions and advancing digital transformation and interoperability; Capacities for transparency and accountability; Capacities for strengthened parliamentary work on regulation, oversight and representation; Capacities for local governments and governance, including addressing challenges from forced displaced populations; Capacities for designing strategic plans, including anticipatory and inclusive approaches. Baseline (2025): 90 0 0 13 0 Target (2029) 150 15 15 40 20 Source: UNDP annual, service plans, project documents, internal and external reports, web publications I.2.1.2. Number of institutions and organizations strengthened towards new generation of gender-responsive, people-centred policies and services that are: Implementing the gender equality seal in public institutions; Developing capacities through regional initiatives. Baseline (2025): 80 106 Target (2029): 100 146 Source: UNDP annual, service plans, project documents, evaluation reports, institutional diagnosis, workshop inscriptionsParlAmericas, Conference of Ministers of Justice of Ibero-American Countries (COMJIB), Network of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights of the American Continent (RINDHCA), Organization of Latin American and Caribbean Supreme Audit Institutions (OLACEF), Inter-American Commission of Women, Regional Conference on Women**,** Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences (FLACSO), Latin American Council of Social Sciences (CLACSO), Latin American Team for Justice and Gender (ELA), Trinidad and Tobago Judicial Education Institute, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States Judicial Education Institute, AECID, Spanish decentralized cooperation, CAF, government institutions, Eastern Caribbean Alliance for Diversity and Equality (ECADE), Equals Foundation
O 2.2. Rule of law, justice and security institutions are strengthened for enhanced people-centred access to justice greater security and resilience, and the full enjoyment of human rights. Number of initiatives that support institutions and organizations of the justice ecosystems to advance people-centred access to justice with a gender responsive approach. Baselines (2025): 18 Targets (2029): 50 Source: UNDP global, regional and national documents, internal and external reports, web publications Number of institutions supported to improve the delivery of evidence-based, people-centred security services that reduce the negative impact of different types of violence, broken by: Initiatives that foster institutional capacities and evidence-based policy to manage security; Initiatives that foster women, youth, peace and security; Initiatives that foster mechanisms for resilience and reduce negative impacts of organized crime and violence reduction. Baseline (2025): 18 16 8 Target (2029): 32 36 46 Source: UNDP global, regional and national documents, internal and external reports, web publications I.2.2.3. Number of national human rights institutions supported to comply with nationally and internationally ratified human rights commitments, including: (a) strategic plans, policies, trainings and e-solutions to strengthen institutional capacities of national human rights institutions; (b) innovative solutions on business and human rights; and (c) initiatives to support national and regional networks of human rights defenders. Baseline (2025): 9 Target (2029): 34
Source: UNDP global, regional and national documents, internal and external reports, web publications, O 2.3. Effective governance and inclusive public sphere are strengthened at national and subnational levels through the active participation of citizens in decision-making spaces to promote inclusive economic development, women´s leadership, trust and social cohesion. I.2.3.1. Number of institutions engaged in capacity building processes that strengthen effective governance disaggregated, by: Initiatives promoting open and inclusive public sphere, including youth participation; Initiatives supporting electoral management bodies and other stakeholders to conduct or support inclusive, peaceful and credible electoral processes; Initiatives of future-ready institutions, including capacities for social participation; Initiatives strengthening capacities to effectively plan and promote local development; Initiatives promoting information integrity systems. Baseline (2025): 0 0 0 0 0 Target (2029): 20 25 15 8 12 Source: UNDP service plans, project documents, internal and external reports, web publications. I.2.3.2. Number of national and regional initiatives that promote women’s leadership, participation and parity, including policies and legislation. Baseline (2025): 8 Target (2029): 16 Source: UNDP annual, service plans, project documents, internal and external reports, web publications.
Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 ,9, 10, 11 ,12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
REGIONAL PROGRAMME OUTCOME #3 HEALTHY PLANET: By 2029, international environmental agreements are mainstreamed into national development frameworks of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean to drive sustainable development.
RELATED STRATEGIC PLAN OUTCOME 4: By 2029, international environmental agreements are mainstreamed into national development frameworks to drive sustainable development.
Improvement in Environmental Policy Stringency Index and related policy coherence scores measuring the strength, alignment and enforcement of environmental policies (RRF SO 4.6 Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBD Number of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean doubling energy efficiency improvements and tripling renewable power capacity by 2030 (RRF SO 4.7) Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBD I.3.4. International and domestic financial flows to developing countries in Latin America and the Caribbean to finance environmental goals (RRF SO 4.1) Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBDOECD Environmental Policy Stringency Index and environmental policy review SDG 7.2.1/7.3.1 and International Energy Agency, UNFCCC, International Renewable Energy AgencyNational and subnational development and sectoral strategies, policies, institutions and financial frameworks are transformed/supported to better align with climate, nature, sustainable energy and pollution reduction priorities – ensuring policy coherence across sectors and levels of governance to drive human development. Number of strategies and policies revised and/or adopted to reflect integrated environmental and sustainable energy priorities. Baseline (2025): 0 Target (2029): 66 Source: UNDP Environment and Energy (E&E) monitoring and evaluation system. Percentage of revised and/or adopted financial frameworks explicitly linked to national development priorities and stakeholder-identified needs. Baseline (2025): 0 Target (2029): 100 Source: UNDP E&E monitoring and evaluation system.Global Environmental Facility (GEF), Green Climate Fund (GCF), Adaptation Fund, UNEP, FAO, CARICOM, CAF, IDB, international financial institutions, national and regional development banks, European Union, European Commission, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, private sectorRegular: $700,000
Other: $7,210,424
OECD https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/climate-finance-and-the-usd-100-billion-goal.html SDG 15.a + SDG 15.b (for nature finance)O.3.2. Environmental and energy actions are accelerated and upscaled through integrated approaches that promote sustainable economic growth, equality between men and women, human rights, social cohesion and equity I.3.2.1. Number of integrated environmental and energy initiatives launched or scaled up nationally/subnationally. Baseline (2025): 0 Target (2029): 12 Source: UNDP E&E monitoring and evaluation system.
I.3.2.2. Volume of financial resources mobilized or unlocked through public and private investments in
Latin America and the Caribbean countries through integrated environment and energy actions. Baseline (2025): 0 Target (2029): TBD Source: UNDP E&E monitoring and evaluation system.
Related SDG: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, 17
REGIONAL PROGRAMME OUTCOME #4 PROSPERITY FOR ALL: By 2029, prosperity in Latin America and the Caribbean is increased for all strengthening people’s agency, capabilities and dignity to thrive.
RELATED STRATEGIC PLAN OUTCOME 1: By 2029, prosperity is increased for all strengthening people’s agency, capabilities and dignity to thrive.
Proportion of population in Latin America and the Caribbean covered by social protection floors/systems (RRF SO 1.3) Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBD Proportion of small-scale enterprises with a loan or line of credit Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBD Labour force participation rate for persons aged 15+, by gender Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBDILO SDG 9.3, annually ILOSTAT https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/# annuallyO 4.1. People and enterprises across the region have increased access to productive and financial assets, skills, digital solutions, income opportunities and sustainable jobs by strengthening their agency through regional, national and local initiatives, with special attention to those left behind Number of initiatives designed and implemented to accelerate socioeconomic transformation by strengthening: Capacities and resilience of MSMEs led particularly by women and youth; Capacities and effectiveness of public and private institutions in supporting local economic development and business ecosystems. Baseline (2025): 2 1 Target (2029): 12 12 Source: UNDP, annual, service plan signed, evaluations, project documentsECLAC, ILO, UN-Women, UNFPA, PAHO, SICA, SEGIB, Inter- American Commission of Women, Regional Conference on Women**,** FLACSO, CLACSO, ELA, CAF, Global Alliance for Care, Oxfam, Open Society, ECADE, Equals Foundation, AECID, Spanish decentralized cooperation, European Union-Latin America and the Caribbean national and regional development banks, government institutions, private sectorRegular: $700,000
Other: $10,138,304
I.4.1.2. Number of institutions supported to implement initiatives that strengthen socioeconomic opportunities for women in the region, broken by: Initiatives on Equanomics implemented to advance women´s economic empowerment and inclusive fiscal frameworks; Initiatives on the gender equality seal in financial institutions. Baseline (2025): 12 4
Target (2029): (a) 24 (b) 20 Source: UNDP, annual, service plans, project documents, internal and external reports, web publications, evaluation reports, institutional diagnosis O 4.2. Social protection, health, and care policies and programmes are strengthened and made more adaptive at the national and local levels through regionally facilitated policy advice, digital innovations and knowledge exchange, supporting countries in extending coverage and responsiveness to all, with special attention to those left behind. I.4.2.1. Number of national and/or local institutions supported to measure poverty and vulnerability and to enhance efficiency and impact of social policy, broken by: National institutions; Local institutions. Baseline (2025): 0 0 Target (2029): 12 3 Source: UNDP, annual, national policy documents, service plans, bulletins, web publications I.4.2.2. Number of institutions receiving technical support to improve coverage, efficiency or impact of social protection or health policies or programmes: social protection policies or programmes; health policies or programmes. Baseline (2025): 0 TBD Target (2029): 16 TBD Source: UNDP, annual, national policy documents, service plans, bulletins, web publications I.4.2.3. Number of countries with strengthened capacities for the creation of care policies, services and programs, broken down by:
Care policies; Care maps. Baseline (2025): 3 9 Target (2029): 7 17 Source: UNDP, annual, service plans, project documents, care maps
REGIONAL PROGRAMME ACCELERATORS: Actions across resilience, governance, prosperity and planetary health will be amplified, catalysing faster, more inclusive and more sustainable development across Latin America and the Caribbean.
A.1. Number of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean that have made positive progress on artificial intelligence readiness to enable responsible and inclusive adoption of artificial intelligence (RRF SO 2.7) Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBD Amount (in United States dollars) of public and private finance leveraged at regional level for the SDGs (RRF A.3.2.1) Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBD Proportions of positions in national and local institutions, including: (a) the legislatures; and (b) the public service, compared to national distributions, by sex (RRF SO 2.3) Baseline (2025): TBD Target (2029): TBDGovernment Artificial Intelligence Readiness Index by Oxford Insights UNDESA e-government development index SDG 16.7.1Countries strengthen digital ecosystems and institutional capacities to accelerate inclusive digital transformation, enhance access to digital services, and foster sustainable, equitable and resilient societies. Number of countries supported to strengthen national digital ecosystems Baseline (2025): 2 Target (2029): 6 Source: UNDP annual Number of policy instruments and regulatory frameworks supported to foster ethical, inclusive and safe digital transformation Baseline (2025): 2 Target (2029): 6 Source: UNDP annual Regulatory, institutional and policy frameworks and capacities are strengthened at national and subnational levels to expand and align public and private finance and investments in sustainable development, including through regional coalitions Number of initiatives launched by public institutions at the national level to develop progressive fiscal policies, expand fiscal space and align public finance with sustainable development Baseline (2025): 19 Target (2029): 27 Source: UNDP annual, global and national projects reportsCAF, IDB, European Commission, UNESCO, ECLAC, CARICOM, UN-Women, UNFPA, ASC, Humanitarian Open Street Map, Financial Centres for Sustainability Network (FC4S), FLACSO, CLACSO, ELA, Norway, Germany, Finland, OECD, government institutions, academiaRegular: $400,000
Other: $2,149,152
Number of initiatives launched by public institutions at subnational level to develop progressive fiscal policies, expand fiscal space and align public finance with sustainable development Baseline (2025): 25 Target (2029): 37 Source: UNDP annual, global and national projects reports Number of initiatives that increase capacities of Public institutions to unlock and align private capital for sustainable development; Private institutions to unlock and align private capital for sustainable development, including by engaging with the financial sector. Baseline (2025): 9 8 Target (2029): 13 12 Source: Annual, global and national projects reports A.2.4. Number of integrated national financing frameworks supported in the design and/or implementation phase Baseline (2025): 7 Target (2029): 13 Source: UNDP annual, global and national projects reports Institutions and organization at regional, subregional and national level strengthened their capacity to increase women´s participation, leadership and empowerment. Number of partnerships established with institutions, platforms and organizations to advance women´s empowerment, broken down by: Regional and subregional intergovernmental organizations supported; Civil society organizations, women´s organizations, academia and think tanks; Foundations, international financial institutions, United Nations entities and donors Baseline (2025): 8 10
(c) 12 Target (2029): (a) 10 (b) 18 (c) 16 Source: UNDP, annual, memoranda of understanding, project documents, internal and external reports, websites A.3.2. Number of country offices assisted in strengthening their capacities to enhance their national contributions for women’s empowerment, broken down by: Enhanced gender capacities for planning, advocating and innovating on gender equality; Implement the gender equality seal for development. Baseline (2025): 12 15 Target (2029): 20 18 Source: National policy documents, UNDP, annual

Clasificadores de servicios – Dashboard RBLAC 3.0

Categoría: F01 Pensamiento estratégico y liderazgo intelectual

Definición de agenda, narrativas, estrategias regionales y posicionamiento de temas nuevos o emergentes; prospectiva; representación estratégica del PNUD.

Categoría: F02 Investigación, datos y productos de conocimiento

Estudios, informes, publicaciones, notas y documentos de política, guías metodológicas y diagnósticos, junto con encuestas, índices, tableros, observatorios y sistemas de medición.

Categoría: F03 Incidencia, comunicación y visibilidad

Campañas, comunicación institucional, difusión y lanzamiento de productos, sensibilización, materiales y participación de visibilidad en eventos externos.

Categoría: F04 Asesoría de política y asistencia técnica

Asesoría sustantiva y acompañamiento técnico a oficinas de país, gobiernos y socios para diseñar, reformar o implementar políticas, marcos normativos e instituciones.

Categoría: F05 Desarrollo de capacidades y formación

Cursos, diplomados, talleres, academias, clínicas, transferencia metodológica y programas estructurados de fortalecimiento de capacidades.

Categoría: F06 Gestión del conocimiento, intercambio entre pares y cooperación Sur-Sur

Sistematización de experiencias, comunidades de práctica, redes y plataformas de conocimiento, cooperación Sur-Sur e intercambios entre países.

Categoría: F07 Diálogo multiactor, convocatoria y alianzas

Foros, diálogos regionales, eventos de alto nivel convocados por el PNUD, coordinación interagencial y con organismos regionales, y gestión de alianzas.

Categoría: F08 Innovación y transformación digital

Pilotos y experimentos, prototipado, escalamiento de innovaciones y desarrollo o despliegue de productos y plataformas digitales (SIGOB, eMonitor+, georreferenciación).

Categoría: F09 Diseño, formulación y expansión programática

Formulación de proyectos y programas: notas conceptuales, PRODOC, fases preparatorias (PPG), desarrollo de pipeline y expansión programática.

Categoría: F10 Implementación y supervisión programática

Ejecución, supervisión y acompañamiento de la implementación de proyectos y programas regionales y de fondos verticales (GEF, GCF, Protocolo de Montreal), incluidas transferencias a socios ejecutores.

Categoría: F11 Movilización de recursos y financiamiento del desarrollo

Movilización de recursos para el PNUD y los países, y apoyo a instrumentos y marcos de financiamiento del desarrollo (INFF, DFA, bonos temáticos, deuda, finanzas mixtas, fiscalidad).

Categoría: F12 Monitoreo, evaluación y aprendizaje

Sistemas de monitoreo y evaluación, evaluaciones de programas y portafolios, seguimiento de compromisos e informes de resultados.

Categoría: F13 Gestión operativa e institucional

Gestión interna del Hub y de recursos: equipos, asignación de fondos institucionales, apoyo logístico, adquisiciones y procesos corporativos. Categoría residual.

Base de datos Dashboard 3.0

Campos de la base de datos y valores de las listas desplegables

Valores de las listas

Action

Text

Description

Text

Outcome

List · 5 opciones

  • 1. Crisis resilience
  • 2. Effective governance
  • 3. Healthy planet
  • 4. Prosperity for all
  • 5. Accelerator

Output

List · 12 opciones

  • O.1.1 Capacities for gender-responsive crisis prevention
  • O.1.2 Innovative solutions for response and resilience
  • O.2.1 People-centred public institutions and services
  • O.2.2 Justice, security and human rights institutions
  • O.2.3 Citizen participation and inclusive governance
  • O.3.1 Environmental policies and financial frameworks aligned
  • O.3.2 Integrated environment and energy action scaled up
  • O.4.1 Access to assets, skills and sustainable jobs
  • O.4.2 Adaptive social protection, health and care
  • A.1 Inclusive digital transformation
  • A.2 Public and private finance for development
  • A.3 Women’s participation and leadership

Indicator

List · 53 opciones

  • I.1.1.1 – Number of institutional actors and stakeholders that implement people-centred proactive measures through enhanced capacities on risk-informed planning, governance and coordination – (a) Disaster risk reduction and recovery
  • I.1.1.1 – Number of institutional actors and stakeholders that implement people-centred proactive measures through enhanced capacities on risk-informed planning, governance and coordination – (b) Human mobility, conflict prevention and peacebuilding
  • I.1.1.1 – Number of institutional actors and stakeholders that implement people-centred proactive measures through enhanced capacities on risk-informed planning, governance and coordination – (c) Adaptation to climate change
  • I.1.1.1 – Number of institutional actors and stakeholders that implement people-centred proactive measures through enhanced capacities on risk-informed planning, governance and coordination – (d) Inclusion of gender-responsive approach to crises and disaster risk management
  • I.1.2.1 – Number of inclusive innovative solutions that enable key stakeholders to promote long-term resilience through enhanced capacities – (a) Disaster risks reduction, losses, damage and recovery
  • I.1.2.1 – Number of inclusive innovative solutions that enable key stakeholders to promote long-term resilience through enhanced capacities – (b) Human mobility, conflict prevention and peacebuilding
  • I.1.2.1 – Number of inclusive innovative solutions that enable key stakeholders to promote long-term resilience through enhanced capacities – (c) Adaptation to climate change
  • I.1.2.1 – Number of inclusive innovative solutions that enable key stakeholders to promote long-term resilience through enhanced capacities – (d) Inclusion of gender-responsive approach to crises and disaster risk management
  • I.2.1.1 – Number of public institutions strengthened to deliver people-centred policies and services – (a) Capacities to implement programmes, deliver services and run effective operations, including using digital solutions and advancing digital transformation and interoperability
  • I.2.1.1 – Number of public institutions strengthened to deliver people-centred policies and services – (b) Capacities for transparency and accountability
  • I.2.1.1 – Number of public institutions strengthened to deliver people-centred policies and services – (c) Capacities for strengthened parliamentary work on regulation, oversight and representation
  • I.2.1.1 – Number of public institutions strengthened to deliver people-centred policies and services – (d) Capacities for local governments and governance, including addressing challenges from forced displaced populations
  • I.2.1.1 – Number of public institutions strengthened to deliver people-centred policies and services – (e) Capacities for designing strategic plans, including anticipatory and inclusive approaches
  • I.2.1.2 – Number of institutions and organizations strengthened towards new generation of gender-responsive, people-centred policies and services – (a) Implementing the gender equality seal in public institutions
  • I.2.1.2 – Number of institutions and organizations strengthened towards new generation of gender-responsive, people-centred policies and services – (b) Developing capacities through regional initiatives
  • I.2.2.1 – Number of initiatives that support institutions and organizations of the justice ecosystems to advance people-centred access to justice with a gender responsive approach
  • I.2.2.2 – Number of institutions supported to improve the delivery of evidence-based, people-centred security services that reduce the negative impact of different types of violence – (a) Initiatives that foster institutional capacities and evidence-based policy to manage security
  • I.2.2.2 – Number of institutions supported to improve the delivery of evidence-based, people-centred security services that reduce the negative impact of different types of violence – (b) Initiatives that foster women, youth, peace and security
  • I.2.2.2 – Number of institutions supported to improve the delivery of evidence-based, people-centred security services that reduce the negative impact of different types of violence – (c) Initiatives that foster mechanisms for resilience and reduce negative impacts of organized crime and violence reduction
  • I.2.2.3 – Number of national human rights institutions supported to comply with nationally and internationally ratified human rights commitments, including (a) strategic plans, policies, trainings and e-solutions to strengthen institutional capacities of national human rights institutions, (b) innovative solutions on business and human rights, and (c) initiatives to support national and regional networks of human rights defenders
  • I.2.3.1 – Number of institutions engaged in capacity building processes that strengthen effective governance – (a) Initiatives promoting open and inclusive public sphere, including youth participation
  • I.2.3.1 – Number of institutions engaged in capacity building processes that strengthen effective governance – (b) Initiatives supporting electoral management bodies and other stakeholders to conduct or support inclusive, peaceful and credible electoral processes
  • I.2.3.1 – Number of institutions engaged in capacity building processes that strengthen effective governance – (c) Initiatives of future-ready institutions, including capacities for social participation
  • I.2.3.1 – Number of institutions engaged in capacity building processes that strengthen effective governance – (d) Initiatives strengthening capacities to effectively plan and promote local development
  • I.2.3.1 – Number of institutions engaged in capacity building processes that strengthen effective governance – (e) Initiatives promoting information integrity systems
  • I.2.3.2 – Number of national and regional initiatives that promote women’s leadership, participation and parity, including policies and legislation
  • I.3.1.1 – Number of strategies and policies revised and/or adopted to reflect integrated environmental and sustainable energy priorities
  • I.3.1.2 – Percentage of revised and/or adopted financial frameworks explicitly linked to national development priorities and stakeholder-identified needs
  • I.3.2.1 – Number of integrated environmental and energy initiatives launched or scaled up nationally or subnationally
  • I.3.2.2 – Volume of financial resources mobilized or unlocked through public and private investments in Latin America and the Caribbean countries through integrated environment and energy actions
  • I.4.1.1 – Number of initiatives designed and implemented to accelerate socioeconomic transformation – (a) Capacities and resilience of MSMEs led particularly by women and youth
  • I.4.1.1 – Number of initiatives designed and implemented to accelerate socioeconomic transformation – (b) Capacities and effectiveness of public and private institutions in supporting local economic development and business ecosystems
  • I.4.1.2 – Number of institutions supported to implement initiatives that strengthen socioeconomic opportunities for women in the region – (a) Initiatives on Equanomics implemented to advance women’s economic empowerment and inclusive fiscal frameworks
  • I.4.1.2 – Number of institutions supported to implement initiatives that strengthen socioeconomic opportunities for women in the region – (b) Initiatives on the gender equality seal in financial institutions
  • I.4.2.1 – Number of national and/or local institutions supported to measure poverty and vulnerability and to enhance efficiency and impact of social policy – (a) National institutions
  • I.4.2.1 – Number of national and/or local institutions supported to measure poverty and vulnerability and to enhance efficiency and impact of social policy – (b) Local institutions
  • I.4.2.2 – Number of institutions receiving technical support to improve coverage, efficiency or impact of social protection or health policies or programmes – (a) Social protection policies or programmes
  • I.4.2.2 – Number of institutions receiving technical support to improve coverage, efficiency or impact of social protection or health policies or programmes – (b) Health policies or programmes
  • I.4.2.3 – Number of countries with strengthened capacities for the creation of care policies, services and programmes – (a) Care policies
  • I.4.2.3 – Number of countries with strengthened capacities for the creation of care policies, services and programmes – (b) Care maps
  • A.1.1 – Number of countries supported to strengthen national digital ecosystems
  • A.1.2 – Number of policy instruments and regulatory frameworks supported to foster ethical, inclusive and safe digital transformation
  • A.2.1 – Number of initiatives launched by public institutions at the national level to develop progressive fiscal policies, expand fiscal space and align public finance with sustainable development
  • A.2.2 – Number of initiatives launched by public institutions at subnational level to develop progressive fiscal policies, expand fiscal space and align public finance with sustainable development
  • A.2.3 – Number of initiatives that increase capacities to unlock and align private capital for sustainable development – (a) Public institutions to unlock and align private capital for sustainable development
  • A.2.3 – Number of initiatives that increase capacities to unlock and align private capital for sustainable development – (b) Private institutions to unlock and align private capital for sustainable development, including by engaging with the financial sector
  • A.2.4 – Number of integrated national financing frameworks supported in the design and/or implementation phase
  • A.3.1 – Number of partnerships established with institutions, platforms and organizations to advance women’s empowerment – (a) Regional and subregional intergovernmental organizations supported
  • A.3.1 – Number of partnerships established with institutions, platforms and organizations to advance women’s empowerment – (b) Civil society organizations, women’s organizations, academia and think tanks
  • A.3.1 – Number of partnerships established with institutions, platforms and organizations to advance women’s empowerment – (c) Foundations, international financial institutions, United Nations entities and donors
  • A.3.2 – Number of country offices assisted in strengthening their capacities to enhance their national contributions for women’s empowerment – (a) Enhanced gender capacities for planning, advocating and innovating on gender equality
  • A.3.2 – Number of country offices assisted in strengthening their capacities to enhance their national contributions for women’s empowerment – (b) Implement the gender equality seal for development
  • Does not apply

Parent project

Text

Service type

List · 13 opciones

  • Strategic thinking and thought leadership
  • Research, data and knowledge products
  • Advocacy, communications and visibility
  • Policy advice and technical assistance
  • Capacity development and training
  • Knowledge management, peer exchange and South-South cooperation
  • Multi-stakeholder dialogue, convening and partnerships
  • Innovation and digital transformation
  • Programme design, formulation and scale-up
  • Programme implementation and oversight
  • Resource mobilization and development finance
  • Monitoring, evaluation and learning
  • Operational and institutional management

Country, countries, region

List (Multiple choice) · 37 opciones

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Argentina
  • Bahamas
  • Barbados
  • Belize
  • Bolivia
  • Brazil
  • Central America
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Costa Rica
  • Cuba
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador
  • El Salvador
  • Grenada
  • Guatemala
  • Guyana
  • Haiti
  • Honduras
  • Jamaica
  • Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
  • Mexico
  • Nicaragua
  • Panama
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • South America
  • Suriname
  • The Caribbean
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Uruguay
  • Venezuela

Recipient

Text

Origin

List · 2 opciones

  • Supply
  • Demand

Lead team

List · 6 opciones

  • Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Environment Team
  • Gender
  • Governance
  • HIV and Health
  • Inclusive Growth

Focal Point

Text

Integrated work

List · 7 opciones

  • Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Environment Team
  • Gender
  • Governance
  • HIV and Health
  • Inclusive Growth
  • Without integrated work

Regional project

List

Signature solutions

List

Partner type

List · 7 opciones

  • None
  • Academia
  • Public Sector
  • Private sector
  • Civil Society/NGO
  • UN Agency
  • International Org

Partner name

List · 49 opciones

  • AACID
  • Academia
  • AECID
  • CAF
  • CDB
  • Civil Society/NGO
  • ECLAC
  • European Union
  • FAO
  • GEF
  • Government Institutions
  • IADB
  • IDEA
  • IDRC
  • IE
  • IFI
  • IKI
  • ILO
  • IOM
  • JICA
  • KOICA
  • OECD
  • Other
  • Other International Org
  • Other UN offices
  • PAHO
  • PeaceBuilding Fund (PBF)
  • Private Sector
  • Public Sector
  • SEGIB
  • SIDA
  • UN Habitad
  • UN Women
  • UNAIDS
  • UNCTAD
  • UNDRR
  • UNEP
  • UNESCO
  • UNFPA
  • UNHCR
  • UNICEF
  • Universities
  • UNODC
  • UNOPS
  • USAID
  • UWI
  • World Bank
  • World Food Program
  • World Justice Programme

Funding

List · 2 opciones

  • Core
  • Non-core

Funding type

List · 14 opciones

  • Adaptation Fund
  • Cost Sharing
  • Cost sharing
  • Global Environmental Facility
  • Global Programme
  • Government
  • Green Climate Fund
  • HQ Funding
  • Multilateral
  • Non-Government
  • Service Plan
  • Staff time
  • TRAC
  • Unfunded

Period

List ·

  • TBD

Status

List · 4 opciones

  • Planned
  • Ongoing
  • Dropped
  • Closed

RBLAC Dashboard 3 – Clasificación por tipo de servicio

Código;Categoría final;Definición;¿Nueva o mantenida? · Origen en los seis grupos;# acciones;% del total;Alta;Media;Baja;Fórmula equivalente para conteo vivo (pegar en E si se reclasifica)
F01;Pensamiento estratégico y liderazgo intelectual;»Definición de agenda, narrativas, estrategias regionales y posicionamiento de temas nuevos o emergentes; prospectiva; representación estratégica del PNUD.»;G3 pensamiento estratégico + G5 A1 + G6 A1;14;0,7%;2;8;4;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A2)
F02;Investigación, datos y productos de conocimiento;Estudios, informes, publicaciones, notas y documentos de política, guías metodológicas y diagnósticos, junto con encuestas, índices, tableros, observatorios y sistemas de medición.;NUEVA (complementada): fusiona el clasificador propuesto para G1 ‘Producción de conocimiento, investigación y datos’ con G6 A2 y A3. G2/G3/G5 no tenían categoría propia de producción de conocimiento.;430;22,0%;235;172;23;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A3)
F03;Incidencia, comunicación y visibilidad;Campañas, comunicación institucional, difusión y lanzamiento de productos, sensibilización, materiales y participación de visibilidad en eventos externos.;G1 Advocacy + G2 Advocacy + G3 sensibilización + G5 A2 + G6 A4;43;2,2%;18;20;5;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A4)
F04;Asesoría de política y asistencia técnica;Asesoría sustantiva y acompañamiento técnico a oficinas de país, gobiernos y socios para diseñar, reformar o implementar políticas, marcos normativos e instituciones.;G1 Policy Advise to CO/HQ + G2 Policy Advice & TA + G3 (clasificador propuesto de AT) + G5 D1 + G6 B1;182;9,3%;93;51;38;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A5)
F05;Desarrollo de capacidades y formación;Cursos, diplomados, talleres, academias, clínicas, transferencia metodológica y programas estructurados de fortalecimiento de capacidades.;G1 Trainings + Capacity Development + G2 Capacity Development + G3 desarrollo de capacidades + G5 C1 + G6 B2;147;7,5%;119;22;6;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A6)
F06;Gestión del conocimiento, intercambio entre pares y cooperación Sur-Sur;Sistematización de experiencias, comunidades de práctica, redes y plataformas de conocimiento, cooperación Sur-Sur e intercambios entre países.;NUEVA (complementada): fusiona G1 Knowledge Exchanges y South-South Cooperation con G2 Knowledge Management, G3 intercambio entre pares y G6 B3, separando la innovación (que pasa a F08).;48;2,5%;33;14;1;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A7)
F07;Diálogo multiactor, convocatoria y alianzas;Foros, diálogos regionales, eventos de alto nivel convocados por el PNUD, coordinación interagencial y con organismos regionales, y gestión de alianzas.;G1 UN System Coordination + UNCT assistance + G2 Alliances + G5 A3 + G6 B4;57;2,9%;0;50;7;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A8)
F08;Innovación y transformación digital;Pilotos y experimentos, prototipado, escalamiento de innovaciones y desarrollo o despliegue de productos y plataformas digitales (SIGOB, eMonitor+, georreferenciación).;NUEVA (complementada): reúne la mitad de ‘innovación’ de G3 y G5 B1 con G5 D2 (digitalización) y G6 B5. Ningún grupo previo la tenía completa.;179;9,1%;133;38;8;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A9)
F09;Diseño, formulación y expansión programática;Formulación de proyectos y programas: notas conceptuales, PRODOC, fases preparatorias (PPG), desarrollo de pipeline y expansión programática.;NUEVA (complementada): fusiona G3 diseño/formulación y expansión-pipeline con G5 E1 y E3, G1 Project/Programme Advise y G6 C1.;31;1,6%;7;20;4;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A10)
F10;Implementación y supervisión programática;Ejecución, supervisión y acompañamiento de la implementación de proyectos y programas regionales y de fondos verticales (GEF, GCF, Protocolo de Montreal), incluidas transferencias a socios ejecutores.;G3 implementación programática + G5 D1 (mitad) + G6 C2;686;35,0%;243;309;134;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A11)
F11;Movilización de recursos y financiamiento del desarrollo;Movilización de recursos para el PNUD y los países, y apoyo a instrumentos y marcos de financiamiento del desarrollo (INFF, DFA, bonos temáticos, deuda, finanzas mixtas, fiscalidad).;NUEVA (complementada): amplía G1 Resource Mobilization —limitada a fondos para el PNUD— con G5 E2, G3 movilización de recursos y G6 C3, para cubrir también el financiamiento del desarrollo.;122;6,2%;24;98;0;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A12)
F12;Monitoreo, evaluación y aprendizaje;Sistemas de monitoreo y evaluación, evaluaciones de programas y portafolios, seguimiento de compromisos e informes de resultados.;G3 MEL + G5 F1 + G6 C4;15;0,8%;2;11;2;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A13)
F13;Gestión operativa e institucional;Gestión interna del Hub y de recursos: equipos, asignación de fondos institucionales, apoyo logístico, adquisiciones y procesos corporativos. Categoría residual.;G1 Management Support + G2 Management Optimization + G3 apoyo operativo + G5 F2/G1-G4 + G6 D1;4;0,2%;0;3;1;=COUNTIF(‘Matriz de clasificación’!S:S,A14)
;TOTAL;;;1958;100,0%;909;816;233;

Definición de acción

Componente 1. Evaluación y rediseño conceptual

Producto 1. Modelo conceptual actualizado para el monitoreo del Programa Regional 2026 a 2029

1. Alcance

Este documento propone una definición operativa de acción para el Dashboard Regional 3.0, junto con los criterios y reglas que los equipos deberán aplicar al cargar información durante el ciclo del Programa Regional 2026 a 2029.

La acción ha sido, desde 2023, la unidad de registro del Dashboard Regional. Este concepto permitió reunir cerca de dos mil registros de ocho equipos regionales, alimentar reportes corporativos y sostener ejercicios de evaluación que de otro modo no habrían tenido base empírica. El problema no es la acción como concepto, sino la ausencia de una definición común que asegure que lo que un equipo registra sea comparable con lo que registra otro.

El objetivo de esta propuesta es que dos personas de equipos distintos, ante el mismo trabajo, registren el mismo número de acciones y las describan con el mismo nivel de detalle, para que los resultados puedan ser comparables.

2. Por qué es necesario redefinir la unidad de registro

El análisis de la base 2022 a 2025 confirma con datos lo que los equipos y el evaluador señalaron de manera cualitativa. Se identifican cuatro problemas que la nueva definición debe resolver.

2.1 La acción no tiene un tamaño común

Los registros de la base actual abarcan objetos de naturaleza y peso muy distintos. Un mismo campo contiene desde la línea completa de trabajo anual de un equipo hasta la actualización de una propuesta de financiamiento para un país específico. El equipo de ambiente concentra 700 de los 1.958 registros, equivalentes al 36 por ciento del total, porque su información se descarga de PIMS con lógica de proyecto. En el otro extremo, SDG Integration aporta 52 registros. Esa diferencia refleja el mecanismo de captura y no la intensidad real del trabajo.

2.2 El país multiplica los registros de manera desigual

La práctica de repetir una misma acción por cada país destinatario infla el conteo de forma dispar entre equipos. La tabla siguiente muestra cuántas filas se registran por cada nombre de acción distinto.

EquipoRegistrosNombres distintosFilas por acción
SDG Integration52212,48
Inclusive Growth176772,29
HIV and Health68381,79
SDG & Policy2001381,45
Gender3212611,23
LAC Environment Team7006371,10
Governance3613461,04
Disaster Risk Reduction80801,00

Un equipo que atiende a doce países con un mismo servicio puede aparecer con doce veces más actividad que otro que hace un trabajo equivalente y lo registra una sola vez. La acción con mayor repetición de la base, referida a encuestas de hogares de alta frecuencia, aparece 25 veces.

2.3 Contar acciones no informa sobre desempeño

La evaluación del Programa Regional concluyó que la suma de acciones no permite inferir nada sobre efectividad, precisamente porque agrega objetos incomparables. Esa distribución describe mejor la forma en que cada equipo carga información que la composición real de la oferta regional.

De esta manera, el Dashboard 3.0 no necesita una unidad de registro nueva. Necesita que la unidad existente tenga una definición explícita, un umbral de tamaño y reglas de desagregación que todos los equipos apliquen igual.

3. Definición de acción

Una acción es un servicio sustantivo prestado por un equipo regional que responde a un solo tipo de servicio del catálogo, se dirige a un destinatario identificable, genera un resultado o entregable verificable y se ejecuta bajo la responsabilidad de un equipo líder dentro de un período acotado del ciclo programático.

La definición se apoya en cinco atributos que deben cumplirse de manera simultánea. Cada uno responde a un problema concreto identificado en el diagnóstico.

AtributoQué exigeProblema que resuelve
Unidad de servicioToda la acción cabe en un único tipo de servicio del catálogo F01 a F13Evita registros que mezclan asesoría, formación y producción de conocimiento en una sola línea
Unidad de propósitoExiste un resultado o entregable identificable que permite decir cuándo la acción concluyóElimina los registros formulados como áreas de trabajo permanentes sin cierre posible
Unidad de destinatarioSe identifica a quién sirve la acción, ya sea una oficina de país, un conjunto de países, un socio o la propia regiónSustituye la duplicación por país por un atributo de alcance
Unidad de responsabilidadUn equipo líder y un punto focal responden por la acción y por su actualizaciónImpide el doble registro de un mismo trabajo por dos equipos
Unidad de tiempoLa acción tiene un inicio y un cierre previsibles dentro del ciclo programáticoPermite medir duración, avance y cierre en lugar de acumular registros abiertos

3.1 Prueba de verificación antes de cargar

Antes de registrar una acción, quien carga la información debe poder responder afirmativamente a las cinco preguntas siguientes. Si alguna respuesta es negativa, el registro debe dividirse o reformularse.

  1. ¿Toda esta acción corresponde a un solo tipo de servicio del catálogo?
  2. ¿Puedo nombrar el producto, el resultado o el cambio que esta acción deja instalado?
  3. ¿Puedo identificar a quién sirve, sin que la respuesta sea la región en abstracto?
  4. ¿Hay un equipo y una persona que responden por esta acción?
  5. ¿Puedo decir cuándo esta acción quedará concluida?

4. Qué no constituye una acción

Delimitar por exclusión es tan importante como definir. Los siguientes objetos han sido registrados como acciones en el ciclo anterior y no deben serlo en el Dashboard 3.0.

No es una acciónPor quéCómo se registra
Una actividad puntual, como una reunión, una llamada, una misión o la participación en un webinarEs un medio de ejecución, no un servicio con resultado propioComo hito o descripción dentro de la acción a la que pertenece
Un área temática o una línea de trabajo completa del equipoAgrega servicios de naturaleza distinta y nunca concluyeSe descompone en las acciones que la integran
Un proyecto regional o de fondo verticalEs un contenedor de financiamiento, no un servicioComo atributo de financiamiento de las acciones que se ejecutan en su marco
Un país destinatarioEl país describe el alcance de la acción, no su identidadComo atributo de alcance, con selección múltiple
Una tarea administrativa de rutinaNo constituye oferta sustantiva a la región ni a las oficinas de paísNo se registra, salvo que responda a una demanda institucional formal
Un indicador o un output del RPDEs el marco al que la acción contribuye, no la acción mismaComo atributo de vinculación programática

5. Reglas de granularidad

Las siete reglas siguientes traducen la definición en decisiones concretas de carga. Su aplicación uniforme es lo que hace comparable la información entre equipos.

Regla 1. Un tipo de servicio por acción

Si una línea de trabajo comprende varios tipos de servicio del catálogo, se registra como tantas acciones como tipos de servicio contenga. El acompañamiento a una oficina de país que incluye un diagnóstico, un taller de capacitación y una asesoría normativa constituye tres acciones vinculadas entre sí, no una.

Regla 2. El país no divide la acción

Una acción dirigida a varios países se registra una sola vez, con los países como atributo de alcance múltiple. Esta regla por sí sola corrige la distorsión más severa del conteo actual y reduce sustancialmente la carga de trabajo de los equipos que hoy replican la misma fila docenas de veces.

Regla 3. El proyecto es contenedor, no unidad

Los proyectos regionales y de fondos verticales dejan de registrarse como acciones. Lo que se registra son los servicios que el equipo presta en su marco. Para la información proveniente de PIMS se aplica una descomposición estándar por etapa del ciclo, con una acción para el diseño y la formulación, una para la movilización de recursos y una para la implementación y supervisión, todas vinculadas al mismo proyecto. Esta regla resuelve el problema de comparabilidad del equipo de ambiente sin renunciar a la información de PIMS.

Nota: Agregar una nueva columna que pregunte si esa acción pertenece a un proyecto, de esa manera también tenemos un contexto más grande sobre las acciones.

Regla 4. Umbral mínimo de materialidad

Una acción debe suponer trabajo sustantivo del equipo a lo largo de un período y dejar un resultado identificable. El criterio práctico es el siguiente. Si el trabajo solo puede describirse como una fecha en el calendario, es un hito. Si puede describirse como algo que quedó instalado, producido o transferido, es una acción.

Regla 5. Techo de agregación

Una acción no puede abarcar más de un output del Programa Regional ni cubrir la totalidad de una línea de trabajo del equipo. Cuando un registro requiere vincularse a más de un output para describirse, es señal de que debe dividirse.

Regla 6. Continuidad entre períodos

Las acciones que se extienden por más de un período de reporte conservan su identificador y se actualizan mediante el campo de estado. No se vuelven a registrar. Esta regla permite distinguir entre acciones nuevas y acciones en curso, una necesidad expresada de manera reiterada por el equipo directivo.

Regla 7. Un equipo líder por acción

Cada acción tiene un equipo líder que responde por su registro y actualización. Los demás equipos participantes se consignan como contribuyentes en el campo de trabajo integrado. Ningún trabajo se registra dos veces.

6. Casos límite resueltos

Los casos siguientes recogen las situaciones que generaron mayor inconsistencia en el ciclo anterior. Su resolución explícita busca evitar que cada equipo adopte un criterio propio.

CasoCriterio de registro
Un producto de conocimiento regional que se aplica luego en varios paísesUna acción para la producción del documento o del instrumento, clasificada en investigación y datos. Su aplicación en países es una acción distinta de asesoría o asistencia técnica, si supone trabajo sustantivo adicional
Un curso o programa formativo con varias cohortes en un mismo períodoUna sola acción por programa y período, con las cohortes y los países como atributos
Un índice o sistema de medición que se implementa en varios paísesUna acción para el desarrollo o la actualización metodológica y una acción por proceso nacional de implementación cuando implica acompañamiento diferenciado
Asesoría continua a una oficina de país sobre un mismo temaUna acción por período de reporte y por tema, con el estado actualizado. No se registra cada intercambio
Participación del equipo en un foro o conferencia convocado por tercerosNo es una acción, salvo que el PNUD aporte un producto sustantivo, en cuyo caso se registra ese producto
Un proyecto de fondo vertical en fase de implementaciónUna acción de implementación y supervisión por proyecto y período, con el proyecto como atributo de financiamiento
Una propuesta de financiamiento presentada a un fondoUna acción de movilización de recursos, con independencia de si fue aprobada. El resultado se consigna en el estado
Trabajo conjunto de dos o más equipos sobre un mismo temaUna acción registrada por el equipo líder, con los demás equipos consignados como contribuyentes
Una plataforma o herramienta digital desarrollada y luego desplegada en paísesUna acción para el desarrollo y una acción por despliegue cuando este supone adaptación y acompañamiento
Apoyo prestado a solicitud expresa de una oficina de paísSe registra igual que cualquier acción, marcando el origen como demanda. Esta distinción alimenta el análisis de oferta y demanda solicitado por la dirección regional

7. Ejemplos de aplicación

Los ejemplos siguientes provienen de la base 2022 a 2025 y muestran cómo se transforma un registro al aplicar la definición y las reglas.

Ejemplo 1. Registro demasiado agregado

Registro actualProvide policy advice to COs and support them to access Rule of Law Global Programme funding to support rule of law, access to justice, citizen security
DiagnósticoMezcla dos tipos de servicio, asesoría de política y movilización de recursos. No identifica destinatario ni resultado. No tiene cierre posible
Registro propuestoAcción A. Asesoría de política a oficinas de país en estado de derecho y acceso a la justicia, con países como atributo. Acción B. Apoyo a oficinas de país para acceder a financiamiento del Programa Global de Estado de Derecho, clasificada en movilización de recursos

Ejemplo 2. Registro duplicado por país

Registro actualImplementation of the ATENEA Political Parity Index, repetido en seis filas, una por país
DiagnósticoEl país está funcionando como identidad de la acción y no como alcance. Multiplica el conteo sin aportar información
Registro propuestoUna acción de implementación del Índice de Paridad Política ATENEA, clasificada en investigación, datos y productos de conocimiento, con los seis países consignados en el atributo de alcance

Ejemplo 3. Registro sin resultado identificable

Registro actualEffective delivery of policy advice and programme support on elections
DiagnósticoDescribe una función permanente del equipo y no un servicio con cierre. No supera la prueba de unidad de propósito ni la de unidad de tiempo
Registro propuestoLas acciones concretas prestadas en el período, por ejemplo asesoría técnica al organismo electoral de un país para la revisión de su marco normativo, cada una con destinatario, resultado y período

Ejemplo 4. Registro con granularidad adecuada

Registro actualDevelopment of a concept note on District Cooling in the Caribbean as joint proposal with a regional development bank
DiagnósticoCumple los cinco atributos. Un tipo de servicio, un producto verificable, destinatario definido, responsable claro y cierre previsible
Registro propuestoSe mantiene sin cambios, clasificado en diseño, formulación y expansión programática

8. Campos mínimos obligatorios

La definición solo produce información comparable si los campos que describen la acción se completan siempre. Se propone que los siguientes campos sean de llenado obligatorio y que el formulario no permita guardar el registro sin ellos.

CampoContenidoSituación actual
Nombre de la acciónFormulado como servicio prestado, iniciando con un sustantivo de acciónSin criterio común de redacción
DescripciónDos o tres líneas sobre qué se hizo y qué quedó instalado42 por ciento de los registros sin dato
Tipo de servicioUna sola categoría del catálogo F01 a F13Campo nuevo
Destinatario y alcancePaíses o entidades a las que sirve la acción, con selección múltipleHoy se resuelve duplicando filas
OrigenDemanda de una oficina de país u oferta programadaCampo nuevo, solicitado por la dirección regional
Equipo líder y punto focalResponsable del registro y de su actualizaciónNo se registra el punto focal
Estado y períodoEstado de avance y período de reporte, para permitir el seguimiento entre ciclosExiste, con uso irregular
Vinculación programáticaOutput del Programa Regional 2026 a 2029 al que contribuyeSe completa, con outputs secundarios vacíos en el 83 por ciento de los casos
FinanciamientoFuente y tipo de fondo, incluido el proyecto asociado cuando correspondeCampo valorado por la gerencia, se conserva
Trabajo integradoOtros equipos contribuyentes, cuando aplica50 por ciento de los registros sin dato

9. Implicaciones y siguientes pasos

La adopción de esta definición tiene tres consecuencias que conviene anticipar ante los equipos.

  • Menos registros y mejor información. El número total de registros bajará de manera apreciable, sobre todo en los equipos que hoy duplican por país. Esa reducción es el resultado buscado y no una pérdida de información, ya que el detalle se conserva en los atributos.
  • Ruptura de serie. Las series 2022 a 2025 y 2026 a 2029 no serán directamente comparables en volumen. Se recomienda mantener la base histórica como archivo y reconstruir la línea de base con la nueva definición sobre el último año del ciclo anterior.
  • Mayor exigencia de calidad. La carga por equipo se reduce en volumen, pero aumenta en exigencia de precisión. Esto hace indispensable acompañar la definición con ejemplos por equipo y con una sesión de acompañamiento en la primera carga.

CLASIFICADORES DE SERVICIO

Categoría: F01 Pensamiento estratégico y liderazgo intelectual

Definición de agenda, narrativas, estrategias regionales y posicionamiento de temas nuevos o emergentes; prospectiva; representación estratégica del PNUD.

Categoría: F02 Investigación, datos y productos de conocimiento

Estudios, informes, publicaciones, notas y documentos de política, guías metodológicas y diagnósticos, junto con encuestas, índices, tableros, observatorios y sistemas de medición.

Categoría: F03 Incidencia, comunicación y visibilidad

Campañas, comunicación institucional, difusión y lanzamiento de productos, sensibilización, materiales y participación de visibilidad en eventos externos.

Categoría: F04 Asesoría de política y asistencia técnica

Asesoría sustantiva y acompañamiento técnico a oficinas de país, gobiernos y socios para diseñar, reformar o implementar políticas, marcos normativos e instituciones.

Categoría: F05 Desarrollo de capacidades y formación

Cursos, diplomados, talleres, academias, clínicas, transferencia metodológica y programas estructurados de fortalecimiento de capacidades.

Categoría: F06 Gestión del conocimiento, intercambio entre pares y cooperación Sur-Sur

Sistematización de experiencias, comunidades de práctica, redes y plataformas de conocimiento, cooperación Sur-Sur e intercambios entre países.

Categoría: F07 Diálogo multiactor, convocatoria y alianzas

Foros, diálogos regionales, eventos de alto nivel convocados por el PNUD, coordinación interagencial y con organismos regionales, y gestión de alianzas.

Categoría: F08 Innovación y transformación digital

Pilotos y experimentos, prototipado, escalamiento de innovaciones y desarrollo o despliegue de productos y plataformas digitales (SIGOB, eMonitor+, georreferenciación).

Categoría: F09 Diseño, formulación y expansión programática

Formulación de proyectos y programas: notas conceptuales, PRODOC, fases preparatorias (PPG), desarrollo de pipeline y expansión programática.

Categoría: F10 Implementación y supervisión programática

Ejecución, supervisión y acompañamiento de la implementación de proyectos y programas regionales y de fondos verticales (GEF, GCF, Protocolo de Montreal), incluidas transferencias a socios ejecutores.

Categoría: F11 Movilización de recursos y financiamiento del desarrollo

Movilización de recursos para el PNUD y los países, y apoyo a instrumentos y marcos de financiamiento del desarrollo (INFF, DFA, bonos temáticos, deuda, finanzas mixtas, fiscalidad).

Categoría: F12 Monitoreo, evaluación y aprendizaje

Sistemas de monitoreo y evaluación, evaluaciones de programas y portafolios, seguimiento de compromisos e informes de resultados.

Categoría: F13 Gestión operativa e institucional

Gestión interna del Hub y de recursos: equipos, asignación de fondos institucionales, apoyo logístico, adquisiciones y procesos corporativos. Categoría residual.